Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 3-26

  Radach, Ralph ^a,c   Kennedy, Alan ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; EVALUATION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; EYE TRACKING; GAZE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 1642580756     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440340000295     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (121)

1. Allport, D. A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer & S. M. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183-218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 285-311.
3. Becker, W., & Jürgens, R. (1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19, 967-984.
4. Blanchard, H. E. (1985). A comparison of some processing measures based on eye movements. Acta Psychologica, 58, 1-15.
5. Briihl, D., & Inhoff, A. W. (1995). Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 55-67.
6. Brysbaert, M., & Mitchell, D. C. (1996). Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 664-695.
7. Brysbaert, M., & Vitu, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 125-148). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. Carpenter, R. H. (2000). The neural control of looking. Current Biology, 10, 291-293.
9. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
10. Deubel, H., O'Regan, K., & Radach, R. (2000). Attention, information processing and eye movement control. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 355-374). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
11. Dodge, R. (1903). Five types of eye-movement in the horizontal meridian plane of the field of regard. American Journal of Physiology, VIII, 307-329.
12. Dodge, R., & Cline, T. S. (1901). The angle velocity of eye-movements. Psychological Review, 8, 145-157.
13. Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., Desmet, T., & De Baecke, C. (2004). Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 79-103.
14. Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429-446.
15. Duncan, J., Ward, W., & Shapiro, K. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369, 313-315.
16. Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2001). Mathematical models of eye movements in reading: A possible role for autonomous saccades. Biological Cybernetics, 85, 77-87.
17. Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43, 1035-1045.
18. Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42, 621-636.
19. Findlay, J. M., & Walker, R. (1999). A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 661-721.
20. Folk, J. R., & Morris, R. (1995). Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1412-1429.
21. Grainger, J. (2000). From print to meaning via words? In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 147-161). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
22. Grainger, J. (2003). Moving eyes and reading words: How can a computational model combine the two? In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 457-470). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
23. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518-565.
24. Grainger, J., O'Regan, K., Jacobs, A., & Segui, J. (1992). Neighbourhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 49-56.
25. Hafed, Z. M., & Clark, J. J. (2002). Microsaccades as an overt measure of covert attention shifts. Vision Resesarch, 42, 2533-2545.
26. Heller, D. (1982). Eye movements in reading. In R. Groner & P. Fraisse (Eds.), Cognition and eye movements (pp. 139-154). Amsterdam: North Holland.
27. Helmholtz, H. (1910/2000). Handbuch der physiolgischen Optik (Vol. 3, 3rd ed.). A. Gullstrand, J. von Kries, & W. Nagel (Eds.), Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics (Vol. 3. Trans. J. P. C. Southall, New York: Optical Society of America, 1925). (Reprinted in 2000, Bristol: Thoemmes Press. Original work published 1910).
28. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
29. Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2004). Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 104-127.
30. Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 313-334). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
31. Hyönä, J., Munoz, D., Heide, W., & Radach, R. (Eds.). (2002). The brain's eye: Neurobiological and clinical aspects of oculomotor research. In Progress in brain research, Vol. 140. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
32. Hyönä, J., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1430-1440.
33. Hyönä, J., Radach, R., & Deubel, H. (Eds.). (2003). The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
34. Inhoff, A., & Radach, R. (2002). The biology of reading: Use of spatial segmentation in the reading of complex words. Comments on Modern Biology: Part C. Comments on Theoretical Biology, 7, 121-138.
35. Inhoff, A. W., Brühl, D., & Schwartz, J. (1996). Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming and delayed naming tasks. Memory and Cognition, 24, 466-476.
36. Inhoff, A. W., Connine, C., & Radach, R. (2002). A contingent speech technique in eye movement research on reading. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 34, 471-480.
37. Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29-54). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
38. Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Starr, M., & Greenberg, S. (2000). Allocation of visuo-spatial attention and saccade programming during reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 221-246). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
39. Inhoff, A., Starr, M., Liu, W., & Wang, J. (1998). Eye-movement-contingent display changes are not compromised by flicker and phosphor persistance. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(1), 101-106.
40. Inhoff, A. W., & Weger, U. (2003). Enhancing the methodological middle ground. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 335-343). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
41. Irwin, D. (1998). Lexical processing during saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 1-27.
42. Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Five questions about cognitive models and some answers from three models of reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 721-732). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
43. Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(6), 1311-1334.
44. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
45. Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 223-244.
46. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
47. Kennedy, A. (1995). The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time. Paper presented at the AMLaP-95 Conference, Edinburgh, UK.
48. Kennedy, A. (1998). The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time: Evidence for a processing trade-off. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 149-223). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
49. Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 429-455.
50. Kennedy, A., Brooks, R., Flynn, L.-A., & Prophet, C. (2003). The reader's spatial code. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 193-212). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
51. Kennedy, A., Murray, W. S., Jennings, F., & Reid, C. (1989). Comments on the generality of the principle of minimal attachment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 51-76.
52. Kennedy, A., Pynte, J., & Ducrot, S. (2002). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A(4), 1307-1337.
53. Kennedy, A., Radach, R., Heller, D., & Pynte, J. (Eds.). (2000). Reading as a perceptual process. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
54. Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21(1), 68-81.
55. Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2003). SWIFT explorations. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel, (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 391-411). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
56. Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 262-284.
57. Kliegl, R., Olson, R. K., & Davidson, B. J. (1983). On problems of unconfounding perceptual and language processes. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading and perceptual and language processes (pp. 333-343). New York: Academic Press.
58. Konieczny, L. (1996). Human sentence processing: A semantics-oriented parsing approach. (IIG-Reports 3/96). Universität Freiburg, Institut für Informatik und Gesellschaft.
59. LaBerge, D., Carlson, R. L., Williams, J. K., & Bunney, B. G. (1997). Shifting attention in visual space: Tests of moving-spotlight models versus an activity-distribution model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(5), 1380-1392.
60. Legge, G. E., Klitz, T. S., & Tjan, B. S. (1997). Mr. Chips: An ideal observer model of reading. Psychological Review, 104, 524-553.
61. Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., & Pickering, M. J. (1998). Eye movements and measures of reading time. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 55-76). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
62. MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
63. McConkie, G. W. (1981). Evaluating and reporting data quality in eye movement research. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 13, 97-106.
64. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations in words. Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118.
65. McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
66. McConkie, G. W., Underwood, N. R., Zola, D., & Wolverton, G. S. (1985). Some temporal characteristics of processing during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 168-186.
67. Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 667-682.
68. Munoz, D. P. (2002). Saccadic eye movements: Overview of neural circuitry. In J. Hyönä, D. Munoz, W. Heide, & R. Radach (Eds.), The brain's eyes: Neurobiological and clinical aspects of oculomotor research (pp. 89-96). Oxford: Elsevier.
69. Murray, W. S. (2000). Sentence processing: Issues and measures. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 649-664). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
70. O'Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Reviews of oculomotor research: Vol. 4. Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp, 395-453). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
71. O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Optimal viewing position in words and the strategy-tactics theory of eye movements in reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 333-354). New York: Springer.
72. O'Regan, J. K., & Lévy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye-movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 363-383). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
73. O'Regan, J. K., Vitu, F., Radach, R., & Kerr, P. W. (1994). Effects of local processing and oculomotor factors in eye movement guidance in reading. In J. Ygge & G. Lennerstrand (Eds.), Eye movements in reading (pp. 329-348). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
74. Osaka, N., & Osaka, M. (2002). Individual differences in working memory during reading with and without parafoveal information: A moving-window study. American Journal of Psychology, 115, 501-513.
75. Paap, K. R., Chun, E., & Vonnahme, P. (1999). Discrete threshold versus continuous strength models of perceptual recognition, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 277-293.
76. Perea, M., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 767-779.
77. Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance, 26, 820-833.
78. Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. S. (1999). The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1142-1158.
79. Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Reading. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, R., & Lee, H. W. (2000). Phonological coding in word perception and reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 399-426). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
81. Pynte, J., Kennedy, A., & Ducrot, S. (2004). The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 178-202.
82. Pynte, J., Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1991). Within-word inspection strategies in continuous reading: The time-course of perceptual, lexical and contextual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 458-470.
83. Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2000). Relations between spatial and temporal aspects of eye movement control. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 165-192). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
84. Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Heller, D. (2001, Sept.). The role of global top down factors for eye movement control in reading. Paper presented at the conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology, Edinburgh, UK.
85. Radach, R., Inhoff, A. W., & Heller, D. (2002). The role of attention and spatial selection in fluent reading. In E. Witruk, A. Friederici, & T. Lachmann (Eds.), Basic mechanisms of language and language disorders (pp. 137-154). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
86. Radach, R., & McConkie, G. W. (1998). Determinants of fixation positions in words during reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 77-100). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
87. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
88. Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21-30.
89. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
90. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. D. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition, 14, 191-201.
91. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1981). Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 351-373.
92. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
93. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188-1200.
94. Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 504-509.
95. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
96. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (in press). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
97. Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2003). Glenmore: An interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 429-455). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
98. Reilly, R. G., & O'Regan, J. K. (1998). Eye movement control during reading: A simulation of some word-targeting strategies. Vision Research, 38(2), 303-317.
99. Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2000). Saccadic inhibition and gaze contingent research paradigms. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 119-146). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
100. Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2003). Modulation of saccadic inhibition by cognitive or attentional factors: Implications for models of reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 347-360). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
101. Schilling, H. E., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 26, 1270-1281.
102. Schmidt, D. C., & Fayad, M. (1997). Object-oriented application frameworks. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 40, 32-38.
103. Schneider, W. X., & Deubel, H. (2002). Selection-for-perception and selection-for-spatial-motor-action are coupled by visual attention: A review of recent findings and new evidence for stimulus driven saccade control. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
104. Schustack, M. W., Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1987). Local and global sources of contextual facilitation in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 322-340.
105. Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (1992). Fast priming during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 173-184.
106. Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (2000a). Spelling-sound regularity effects on eye fixations in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(2), 402-409.
107. Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (2000b). The when and where of reading in the brain. Brain and Cognition, 42, 78-81.
108. Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a timeline of processing during reading: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuro Report, 9, 2195-2200.
109. Starr, M., & Inhoff, A. (2004). Attention allocation to the right and left of a fixated word: Use of orthographic information from multiple words during reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 203-225.
110. Tinker, M. (1958). Recent studies of eye movements in reading. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 215-231.
111. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
112. Underwood, G., Binns, A., & Walker, S. (2000). Attentional demands on the processing of neighbouring words. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 247-268). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
113. Van Gisbergen, J. A., & Van Opstal, A. J. (1989). The neurobiology of saccadic eye movements: Models. Reviews of Oculomotor Research, 3, 69-101.
114. Vitu, F., & McConkie, G. W. (2000). Regressive saccades and word perception in adult reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 301-326). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
115. Vonk, W., & Cozijn, R. (2003). On the treatment of saccades in and regressions in eye movement measures of reading time. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 291-311). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
116. Vonk, W., Radach, R., & van Reijn, H. (2000). Eye guidance and the saliency of word beginnings in reading text. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 269-300). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
117. Wade, N., Tatler, B. W., & Heller, D. (in press) Dodge-ing the issue: Dodge, Javal, and the discovery of "saccades" in eye movement research. Perception.
118. Ward, R. (2002). Attention moves no faster than the eyes. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
119. Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. (2001). Eye movements during reading: A theory of saccade initiation times. Vision Research, 41(25-26), 3567-3585.
120. Yang, S. N., & McConkie, G. W. (2004). Saccade generation during reading: Are words necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 226-261.
121. Zola, D. (1984). Redundancy and word perception during reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 277-284.