A theoretical framework for the online classroom: A defense and delineation of a student-centered pedagogy

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 2000, Issue 84, 2000, Pages 5-14

  Knowlton, Dave S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15444368467     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.841     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson, D Benjamin, B Busiel, C. and Paredes-Holt, B (1998). Teaching online: Internet research, conversation, and composition (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
2. Anderson, R. S (1998). Why talk about different ways to grade? The shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment. In R. S. Anderson and B. W. Speck (Eds.), Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning paradigm (pp. 5-16). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Axelrod, J (1991). Didactic and evocative teaching modes. In J. L. Bess (Ed.), Foundations of American higher education (pp. 473-479). New York: Simon and Schuster.
4. Bates, A. W (1995). Technology, open learning, and distance education. New York: Roudedge.
5. Berge, Z. L (1996). The role of the online instructor/facilitator, [http://star.ucc.nau.edu/%7Emaur;/moderate/teach_online.html].
6. Berge, Z. L (1999). Interaction in post secondary web-based learning. Educational Technology, 39 (1), 5-11.
7. Bloom, B. S (1984). The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to- one tutoring. Educational Leadership, 41, 4-17.
8. Branch, K (1998). From the margins at the center: Literacy, authority, and the great divide. College Composition and Communication, 50 (2), 206-231.
9. Brooks, J. G and Brooks, M. G (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
10. Bruner, J (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Christiansen, E and Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L (1995). Making distance learning cooperative. [http://www-cscl95.indiana.edu/cscl95/chritia.html].
12. Cobb, P and Bowers, J (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28 (2), 4-15.
13. Connelly, F. M and Clandinin, D. J (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Conway, C (1997). Authentic assessment in undergraduate brass methods class. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 7 (1), 6-15.
15. Cornell, R (1999). The onrush of technology in education: The professor’s new dilemma. Educational Technology, 39 (3), 60-64.
16. Draves, W. A (1999). Why learning online is totally different. Lifelong Learning Today, 3, 4-8.
17. Fraser, S and Deane, E (1997). Why open learning? Australian Universities Review, 40 (1), 25-31.
18. Freire, P (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
19. Johnson, D. W and Johnson, R. T (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1017-1044). New York: Simon and Schuster.
20. Jonassen, D. H (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigelath (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (2nd ed pp. 215-239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Jonassen, D. H Davidson, M Collins, M Campbell, J and Haag, B (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9 (2), 7-26.
22. Jonassen, D. H and Reeves, T. C (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools (pp. 693-719). In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: Simon and Schuster.
23. Kauchak, D. P and Eggen, P. D (1998). Learning and teaching: Research-based methods (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
24. Kearsley, G and Shneiderman, B (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology- based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38 (5), 20-23.
25. Lord, T. R (1997). A comparison between traditional and constructivist teaching in college biology. Innovative Higher Education, 21 (3), 197-216.
26. Moller, L (1998). Designing communities of learners for asynchronous distance education. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 46 (4), 115-122.
27. Olcott, D and Wright, S. J (1995). An institutional support framework for increasing faculty participation in postsecondary distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9 (3), 5-17.
28. Palloff, R. M and Pratt, K (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Pitt, T. J and Clark, A (1997). Creating powerful online courses using multiple instructional strategies, [http://leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu/org/tcc_conf97/pres/pitt.html.]
30. Rolfe, J and Alexander, J (1996). Student-centered college planning: The game plan. Journal of College Admissions, 152-153, 42-47.
31. Savery, J. R and Duffy, T. M (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 45 (1), 31-38.
32. Schieman, E. S Taere, S and McLaren, J (1992). Towards a course development model for graduate level distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 7 (2), 51-65.
33. Skinner, B. F (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24 (2), 86-97.
34. Speck, B. W (1998). The teacher’s role in the pluralistic classroom. Perspectives: Journal of the Association for General and Liberal Studies, 28 (1), 19-44.
35. Spicer, J. I and Bonsell, M (1995). An evaluation of the use of student-centered investigations in teaching comparative animal physiology to undergraduates. Research in Science and Technical Education, 13 (1), 25-35.
36. Vygotsky, L. S (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.