After third grade

Educational Leadership

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 15-22

  Biancarosa, Gina ^a  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27144546943     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171-184.
2. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sandora, C., Kucan, L., & Worthy, J. (1996). Questioning the Author. Elementary School Journal, 96(4), 385-414.
3. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
4. Boston, C. (2002). The concept of formative assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(9). Available: http://PAREonline.net/ getvn.asp?v=8&n=9
5. Brinkerhoff, J. D., Klein, J. D., & Koroghlanian, C. M. (2001). Effects of overviews and computer experience on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(4), 427-440.
6. Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students' ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485-522.
7. Campbell, J. R., Kapinus, B. A., & Beatty, A. S. (1995). Interviewing children about their literacy experiences. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
8. Center for Research on Learning. (2001). Strategic Instruction Model: Learning strategies and teaching routines. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
9. Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715-730.
10. Dreher, M. J. (2003). Motivating struggling readers by tapping the potential of information books. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 25-38.
11. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs for elementary students at risk for reading failure? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 605-619.
12. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 440-460.
13. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989). Monitoring reading growth using student recalls. Journal of Educational Research, 83(2), 103-110.
14. Gaffney, J. S., Methven, J. M., & Bagdasarian, S. (2002). Assisting older students to read expository text in a tutorial setting. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 18, 119-150.
15. Guthrie, J. T., & Humenick, N. M. (2004). Motivating students to read. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329-354). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
16. Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., Von Seeker, C., & Alban, T. (2000). Contributions of instructional practices to reading achievement in a statewide improvement program. Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 211-225.
17. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Guzzetti, B. J. (2000). Learning counterintuitive science concepts: What have we learned from over a decade of research? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16, 89-98.
19. Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 116-159
20. Hasselbring, T. S., & Goin, L. I. (2004). Literacy instruction for older struggling readers: What is the role of technology? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 20, 123-144.
21. Hillocks, G., Jr. (1984). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies. American Journal of Education, 93, 133-170.
22. Hock, M. F., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (2001). The case for strategic tutoring. Educational Leadership, 58(7), 50-52.
23. Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2001). "Just plain reading": A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 350-377.
24. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S, Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children's self-competence and values. Child Development, 73, 509-527.
25. Kamil, M. L., Intrator, S., & Kim, H. S. (2000). Effects of other technologies on literacy and literacy learning. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 771-790), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (2000). The helping behaviors of fifth-graders while using collaborative strategic reading during ESL content classes. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 69-98.
27. Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Arguelles, M. E., Hughes, M. T., & Leftwich, S. A. (2004). Collaborative strategic reading: "Real world" lessons from classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 291-302.
28. Langer, J. A. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 837-880.
29. MacArthur, C, A., Ferretti, R. P., Okolo, C. M., & Cavalier, A. R. (2001). Technology applications for students with literacy problems. Elementary School Journal, 101, 274-301.
30. Matsumura, L. C., Patthey-Chavez, G. G., Valdes, R., & Gamier, H. (2002). Teacher feedback, writing assignment quality, and third-grade students' revision in lower- and higher-achieving urban schools. Elementary School Journal, 103, 3-25.
31. McCrindle, A. R., & Christensen, C. A. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance. Learning and Instruction, 5, 167-185.
32. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 156-163.
33. National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). The nation's report card: Reading 2002. Washington, DC: Author.
34. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children Co read. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Available: www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm
35. O'Connor, R. E., Bell, K. M., Harty, K. R., Larkin, L. K., Sackor, S. M., & Zigmond, N. (2002). Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 474-485.
36. Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory Into Practice, 41(1), 26-32.
37. reading research (Vol. III, pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Reynolds, P. L., & Symons, S. (2001). Motivational variables and children's text search. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 14-22.
39. Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 257-279.
40. Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal-setting, and self-evaluation, Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 159-172.
41. Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1991). Learning goals and progress feedback during reading comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23(3), 351-364.
42. Shanahan, T. (2004). Improving reading achievement in secondary schools. In D. S. Strickland & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Bridging the literacy achievement gap: Grades 4-12 (pp. 43-55). New York: Teachers College Press.
43. Staub, D., & Lenz, B. K. (2000). The effects of Strategic tutoring on Casey family program foster-care youth. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, Center for Research on Learning.
44. Tierney, R. J., & Shanahan, T. (1991). Reading-writing relationships: Processes, transactions, outcomes. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 246-280). New York: Longman.
45. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11(1), 49-65.