Assisting older students to read expositorytext in a tutorial setting: A case for a high-impact intervention

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 119-150

  Gaffney, Janet S ^a   Methven, Jeanette M ^b   Bagdasarian, Shahe ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008837342     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10573560252808512     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson, R. C. (1998). Introduction: Reflections on literacy education. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 1-8). New York: Guilford.
2. Anderson, R. C., Wilson, R, & Fielding, L. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 285-303.
3. Armbruster, B. B. (1984). The problem of "inconsiderate text." In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instmction (pp. 202-217). New York: Longman.
4. Bereiter, C., & Sc-ardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves. Chicago: Open Court.
5. Brack, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439-454.
6. Burdick, R W, & Denner, P. B. (1991, March). Effects of training ninth-grade students in the two methods of self-questioning: Why train students to self-question when they can simple reread? Paper presented at the meeting of the Washington Organization for Reading Development, Bellevue, WA ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 328-904.
7. Burt, C. (1981). Burt word leading test. Wellington, New Zealand: Council for Educational Research.
8. Gamine, D., & Silbert, J. (1979). Direct instmction reading. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
9. Clay, M. M. (1982). Observing young reader's. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10. Clay, M. M. (1987). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educa tional Studies, 22, 155-173.
11. Clay, M. M. (1991a). Introducing a new' storybook to young readers. The Reading Teacher, 45, 264-273.
12. Clay, M. M. (1991b). Why is an inservice programme for Reading Recovery teachers necessary? Reading Horizons, 31, 355-372.
13. Clay, M. M. (1993a). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. Clay, M. M. (1993b). Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers-in-training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15. Clay, M. M. (1998). By different paths to common outcomes. York, ME: Stenhouse.
16. Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25 (6), 5-17.
17. Durkin, D. (1978-1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instmction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-533.
18. Dweck, C. S. (1975). The role of expectancies and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674-685.
19. Elley, W. B. (1980). Assessing the difficulty of reading materials: The noun frequency method. Wellington, New Zealand: Council for Educational Research.
20. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). What's worth fighting for in your school? New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Gafihey, J. S. (1984). LD children's prose recall as a function of prior knowledge, instmction, and context-relatedness. Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 1984. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 25055.
22. Gaffney, J. S. (1998). Prevention of reading and writing failure: Teach reading and writing. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 100-110). New York Guilford.
23. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. East Sussex, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Harris, J. (1990, November). Text annotation and underlining as metacognitive strategies to improve comprehension and retention of expository text. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 335-669.
25. Ivey, G. (1999). A multicase study in the middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers. Reading Research Quarterly 34, 172-192.
26. Johnston, P. H. (1997). Knowing literacy: Constructive literacy assessment. York, ME: Stenhouse.
27. Kletzien, S. B. (1991). Strategy use by good and poor comprehenders reading expositoiy text of differing levels. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 67-86.
28. Lee, N. G., & Neal, J. C. (1992). Reading rescue: Intervention for a student "at promise." Journal of Reading, 36, 276-282.
29. Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1978). Oveijustiflcation research and beyond: Toward a means- ends analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. R. Lepper & D. Greene (Eds.), The hidden costs of reward (pp. 109-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1991). Assessment & instmction of reading disability: An interactive approach. New York: HarperCollins.
31. Merrett, F., & Thorpe, S. (1996). How important is the praise element in the pause, prompt, and praise tutoring procedures for older low-progress readers? Educational Psychology 16, 193-206.
32. Methven, J. M., & Gafihey, J. S. (1993, December). A late intervention project: Tutoring to improve reading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Charleston, SC.
33. Ohlliausen, M. M., & Jepsen, M. (1992). Lessons from Goldilocks: "Somebody's been choosing my books but I can make my own choices now!" The New Advocate, 5, 31-46.
34. Pearson, P. D. (1974-1975). The effects of grammatical complexity on children's comprehension, recall, and conception of certain semantic relations. Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 155-192.
35. Pogrow, S. (1998). What is an exemplary program, and why should anyone care? A reaction to Slavin & Klein. Educational Researcher, 27 (1), 22-29.
36. Quiocho, A. (1997). The quest to comprehend expository text: Applied classroom research. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Litemcy, 40, 450-455.
37. Roe, M. F. (1998, December). Stuck in the middle: Preliminary accounts of middle level poor readers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
38. Schonell, F., & Goodacre, E. (1971). The psychology and teaching of reading (5th ed.). London: Oliver & Boyd.
39. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L., & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analog-induced misconceptions in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 499-531). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Wasik, B. A. (1998). Volunteer tutoring programs in reading: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 266-292.
42. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.