Local model of interaction for haptic manipulation of rigid virtual worlds

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 789-804

  Constantinescu, Daniela ^a   Salcudean, Septimiu E ^b   Croft, Elizabeth A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dynamic proxy; Haptic feedback; Local model of rigid body interaction; Rigid multibody virtual environment

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HAPTIC INTERFACES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DYNAMIC PROXY; HAPTIC FEEDBACK; LOCAL MODEL OF A RIGID BODY INTERACTION; RIGID MULTIBODY VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT;

ELECTRONIC COMMUNITIES;

EID: 27144486944     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0278364905057856     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adachi, Y., Kumano, T., and Ogino, K. 1995. Intermediate representation for stiff virtual objects. Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Research Triangle Park, NC, pp. 203-210.
2. Adams, R. and Hannaford, B. 1999. Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 15(3):465-474.
3. Baraff, D. 1990. Curved surfaces and coherence for non-penetrating rigid body simulation. ACM Computer Graphics 24(4): 19-28.
4. Baraff, D. 1995. Rigid body simulation. An Introduction to Physically Based Modelling, Course Notes, ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 1-68.
5. Basen, J., Erickson, J., Guibas, L., Herschberger, J., and Zhang, L. 1999. Kinetic collision detection between two simple polygons. Proceedings of the 10th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Baltimore, MD, pp. 102-111.
6. Berkelman, P., Hollis, R., and Baraff, D. 1999. Interaction with a real time dynamic environment simulation using a magnetic levitation haptic interface device. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, MI, pp. 3261-3266.
7. Brown, J. 1998. A theoretical and experimental investigation into the factors affecting the Z-width of a haptic display. Master's Thesis, Northwestern University.
8. Brown, J. and Colgate, J. 1994. Physics-based approach to haptic display. Proceedings of the Topical Workshop on Virtual Reality, International Symposium on Measurement and Control in Robotics, Houston, TX, Vol. 1, pp. 101-106.
9. Brown, J. and Colgate, J. 1997. Passive Implementation of Multibody Simulations for Haptic Display. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, pp. 85-92.
10. Cameron, S. 1990. Collision detection by four-dimensional intersection testing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 291-302.
11. Canny, J. 1986. Collision detection for moving polyhedra. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 8:200-209.
12. Canny, J. 1987. The Complexity of Robot Motion Planning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Chang, B. and Colgate, J. 1997. Real-time impulse-based simulation of rigid body systems for haptic display. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, pp. 1-8.
14. Colgate, J. 1994. Coupled stability of multiport systems - theory and experiments. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 116(3):419-428.
15. Colgate, J., Stanley, M., and Brown, J. 1995. Issues in the haptic display of tool use. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 140-145.
16. Constantinescu, D., Salcudean, S., and Croft, E. 2004. Impulsive forces for haptic rendering of rigid contacts. Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Robotics, Paris, France, pp. 1-6.
17. Constantinescu, D., Salcudean, S., and Croft, E. 2005. Haptic rendering of rigid contacts using impulsive and penalty forces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 21(3):309-323.
18. Corming, D. and Staadt, O. 2004. Velocity-aligned discrete oriented polytopes for dynamic collision detection. Technical Report TCSE-2005-25, University of California, Davis, CA, September.
19. Erickson, J., Guibas, L., Stolfi, J., and Zhang, L. 1999. Separation sensitive collision detection for convex objects. Proceedings of the 10th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 327-336.
20. Gregory, A., Mascarenhas, A., Ehmann, S., Lin, M., and Manocha, D. 2000. Six-degree-of-freedom haptic display of polygonal models. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization, Salt Lake City, UT, October, pp. 139-146.
21. Hannaford, B. and Andersen, R. 1988. Experimental and simulation studies of hard contact force reflecting teleoperation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, AZ, May, pp. 24-29.
22. Hay ward, V. and Armstrong, B. 2000. A new computational model of friction applied to haptic rendering. Experimental Robotics VI. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 250, P. Corke and J. Trevelyan, editors, Springer, New York, pp. 404-412.
23. Herzen, B., Barr, A., and Zatz, H. 1990. Geometric collisions for time-dependent parametric surfaces. Computer Graphics 24:39-48.
24. Hubbard, P. 1995. Collision detection for interactive graphics applications. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1(3):218-230.
25. Johnson, D. and Willemsen, P. 2003. Six-degree-of-freedom haptic rendering of complex polygonal models. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 229-235.
26. Khatib, O. 1995. Inertial properties in robotic manipulation: an object-level framework. International Journal of Robotics Research 13(1): 19-36.
27. Kim, Y., Otaduy, M., Lin, M., and Manocha, D. 2003. Six-degree-of-freedom haptic display using incremental and localized contact computations. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12(3):277-295.
28. Kirkpatrick, D., Snoeyink, J., and Speckman, B. 2002. Kinetic collision detection simple polygons. International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications 12:3-27.
29. Larsen, E., Gottschalk, S., Lin, M., and Manocha, D. 1999. Fast proximity queries with swept sphere volumes. Technical Report TR99-018, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
30. Lawrence, D., Pao, L., Dougherty, A., Salada, M., and Pavlou, Y. 2000. Rate-hardness: a new performance metric for haptic interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 16(4):357-371.
31. Mark, W., Randolph, S., Finch, M., Van Verm, J., and Taylor, R. IL 1998. Adding force feedback to graphics systems: issues and solutions. Haptic Virtual Reality for Blind Computer Users, Assistive Technologies, Los Angeles, CA, April, pp. 92-99.
32. Mendoza, C. and Laugier, C. 2001. Realistic haptic rendering for highly deformable virtual objects. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, Yokohama, Japan, September, pp. 264-270.
33. Nahvi, A., Hollerbach, J., Freier, R., and Nelson, D. 1998. Display of friction in virtual environments based on human finger pad characteristics. Proceedings of the ASME Dynamics Systems and Control Division, Anaheim, CA, Vol. DSC-64, pp. 179-184.
34. Park, J. and Niemeyer, G. 2004. Haptic rendering with predictive representation of local geometry. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Chicago, IL, pp. 331-338.
35. Redon, D., Kheddar, A., and Coquillart, S. 2000. An algebraic solution to the problem of collision detection for rigid polyhedral objects. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA.
36. Rosenberg, L. and Adelstein, B. 1993. Perceptual decomposition of virtual haptic surfaces. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Research Frontiers in Virtual Reality, San Jose, CA, pp. 46-53.
37. Ruspini, D. and Khatib, O. 1998. Dynamic models for haptic rendering systems. Advances in Robot Kinematics: ARK98, Strobl/Salzburg, Austria, pp. 523-532.
38. Ruspini, D. and Khatib, O. 2001. Haptic display for human interaction with virtual dynamic environments. Journal of Robotic Systems 18(2):769-783.
39. Ruspini, D., Koralov, K., and Khatib, O. 1997a. The haptic display of complex graphical environments. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 345-352.
40. Ruspini, D., Koralov, K., and Khatib, O. 1997b. Haptic interaction in virtual environments. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'97), Grenoble, France.
41. Sirouspour, M., DiMaio, S., Salcudean, S., Abolmaesumi, P., and Jones, C. 2000. Haptic interface control - design issues and experiments with a planar device. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 789-794.
42. Vedula, S. and Baraff, D. 1996. Force feedback in interactive dynamic simulation. Proceedings of the 1st PHANTOM Users Group Workshop, MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp. 54-57.
43. Zilles,C. and Salisbury, J. 1995. A constraint-based god object method for haptic display. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Human Robot Interaction, and Cooperative Robots, Chicago, IL, pp. 146-151.