Urea- and thiourea-substituted cinchona alkaloid derivatives as highly efficient bifunctional organocatalysts for the asymmetric addition of malonate to nitroalkenes: Inversion of configuration at C9 dramatically improves catalyst performance

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 44, Issue 39, 2005, Pages 6367-6370

  McCooey, Séamus H ^a   Connon, Stephen J ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Asymmetric catalysis; Cinchona alkaloids; Michael addition; Organocatalysis; Ureas

Indexed keywords

CATALYST ACTIVITY; OLEFINS;

ALKALOIDS; DIMETHYL MALONATE; NITROALKENES;

ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

ALKENE; CINCHONA ALKALOID; MALONIC ACID; MALONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; NITRO DERIVATIVE; THIOUREA; UREA;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; STEREOISOMERISM; SYNTHESIS;

ALKENES; CATALYSIS; CINCHONA ALKALOIDS; MALONATES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NITRO COMPOUNDS; STEREOISOMERISM; THIOUREA; UREA;

EID: 26844450640     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200501721     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. For recent reviews, see: a) S. Jayasree, B. List, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 719;
2. b) P. I. Dalko, L. Moisan, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 5248;
3. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5138;
4. c) K. N. Houk, B. List, Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37(8).
5. For reviews of bifunctional systems involving metals see: a) S. France, A. Weatherwax, A. E. Taggi, T. Lectka, Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 592;
6. b) M. Shibasaki, N. Yoshikawa, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2187;
7. c) H. Gröger, Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 5247.
8. H. Hiemstra, H. Wynberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 417.
9. For a more recent study of this alkaloid-catalyzed reaction, see: P. McDaid, Y. Chen, L. Deng, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 348;
10. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 338.
11. For early examples of the use of chiral amines as nucleophilic organocatalysts, see: a) V. Prelog, H. Wilhelm, Helv. Chim. Acta 1954, 37, 1634;
12. b) H. Pracejus, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1960, 634, 9;
13. c) D. Borrmann, R. Wegler, Chem. Ber. 1967, 100, 1575;
14. d) H. Wynberg, R. Helder, Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 4057.
15. For reviews concerning the use of cinchona alkaloid derivatives as organocatalysts, see: a) S.-K. Tian, Y. Chen, J. Hang, L. Tang, P. McDaid, L. Deng, Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 621;
16. b) S. France, D. J. Guerin, S. J. Miller, T. Lectka, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2985;
17. c) K. Kacprzak, J. Gawronski, Synthesis 2001, 961.
18. For a recent review of cinchona alkaloid chemistry, see: H. M. R. Hoffmann, J. Frakenpohl, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 4293.
19. a) Y. Iwabuchi, M. Nakatani, N. Yokoyama, S. Hatakeyama, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10219;
20. b) S. Kawahara, A. Nakano, T. Esumi, Y. Iwabuchi, S. Hatakeyama, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3103.
21. H. Li, Y. Wang, L. Tang, L. Deng, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9906.
22. H. Li, Y. Wang, L. Tang, F. Wu, X. Liu, C. Cuo, B. M. Foxman, L. Deng, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 107;
23. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 105.
24. For early examples of the use of (thio)ureas as organocatalysts, see: a) D. P. Curran, L. H. Kuo, J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3259;
25. b) D. P. Curran, L. H. Kuo, Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6647;
26. c) P. R. Schreiner, A. Wittkopp, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 217;
27. d) P. R. Schreiner, A. Wittkopp, Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 407;
28. e) T. Okino, Y. Hoashi, Y. Takemoto, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2817;
29. f) Review: P. R. Schreiner, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 289.
30. a) M. S. Sigman, E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4901;
31. b) M. S. Sigman, P. Vachal, E. N. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 1336;
32. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1279;
33. c) P. Vachal, E. N. Jacobsen, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 867;
34. d) P. Vachal, E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10012;
35. e) A. G. Wenzel, E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12964;
36. f) A. G. Wenzel, M. P. Lalonde, E. N. Jacobsen, Synlett 2003, 1919;
37. g) G. D. Joly, E. N. Jacobsen, J Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4102;
38. h) M. S. Taylor, E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10558.
39. a) T. Okino, Y. Hoashi, Y. Takemoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12672;
40. b) T. Okino, Y. Hoashi, T. Furukawa, X. Xu, Y. Takemoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 119;
41. c) T. Okino, S. Nakamura, T. Furukawa, Y. Takemoto, Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 625.
42. For recent applications of 2 (and modified derivatives) in kinetic resolution, see: a) A. Berkessel, F. Cleemann, S. Mukherjee, T. N. Müller, J. Lex, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 817;
43. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 807;
44. b) A. Berkessel, F. Cleemann, S. Mukherjee, T. N. Müller, J. Lex, Chem. Commun. 2005, 1898.
45. D. J. Maher, S. J. Connon, Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1301.
46. T. P. Yoon, E. N. Jacobsen, Science 2003, 299, 1691.
47. While this manuscript was being prepared, two reports detailing a similar strategy have appeared: a) for a report disclosing the synthesis of two C-1,2-didehydro cinchonidine/chinchonine-derived variants of 9-epi-DHQT (amongst others) which promoted the efficient addition to thiophenol to α-β-unsaturated imides with low selectivity (up to 17% ee), see: B.-J. Li, L. Jiang, M. Liu, Y.-C. Chen, L.-S. Ding, Y. Wu, Synlett, 2005, 603;
48. b) 9-epi-DHQT and C-1,2-didehydro analogues have been prepared for use in the efficient enantioselective addition of nitromethane to chalcones, and a clear dependence of catalyst activity and selectivity on the relative stereochemistry at C8/C9 has been demonstrated: B. Vakulya, S. Varga, A. Csámpai, T. Soós, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1967.
49. For recent reviews concerning the asymmetric addition of nucleophiles to nitroalkenes, see: a) O. M. Berner, L. Tedeschi, D. Enders, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 1877;
50. b) N. Krause, A. Hoffmann-Röder, Synthesis 2001, 171;
51. c) M. P. Sibi, S. Manyem, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 8033.
52. For a recent review concerning the secondary-amine catalyzed addition of carbonyl compounds to nitroolefins, see: W. Notz, F. Tanaka, C. F. Barbas III, Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 580.
53. a) J. Ji, D. M. Barnes, J. Zhang, S. A. King, S. J. Wittenberger, H. E. Morton, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10215;
54. b) D. M. Barnes, J. Ji, M. G. Fickes, M. A. Fitzgerald, S. A. King, H. E. Morton, F. A. Plagge, M. Preskill, S. H. Wagaw, S. J. Wittenberger, J. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13097;
55. c) M. Watanabe, A. Ikagawa, H. Wang, K. Murata, T. Ikariya, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11148.
56. The prefix "epi" usually refers only to inversion of configuration at a single stereocenter, that is, no functional-group interconversion is implied. The term is adopted in this case for convenient identification of the relative stereochemistry of the catalyst at C8/C9.
57. To the best of our knowledge only Deng et al. (ref. [9]) have thus far successfully selectively converted this hindered substrate by using 20 mol % 6′-demethylated quinine.
58. MM2 force-field energy-minimization calculations were carried out with CS Chem3D Std v.4.0 software. Conformers were minimized to a minimum RMS gradient of 0.02.
59. [12e, 13b].
60. B. J. Hay, T. K. Firman, B. A. Moyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1810.
61. This would account for the observed product stereochemistry, and the decrease in catalyst efficiency and selectivity associated with DHQU relative to 9-epi-DHQU. However, it is acknowledged that alternative rationales are possible, for example, reversal of binding selectivity relative to 9-epi-DHQU, etc. It is envisaged that ongoing structural studies will provide more detailed insight into the catalytic behaviour of these C9 diastereomers.