The new cytogenetics: Blurring the boundaries with molecular biology

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 6, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 782-792

  Speicher, Michael R ^a,b   Carter, Nigel P ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^c WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARCINOGENESIS; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CYTOGENETICS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DNA MICROARRAY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMAN; INHERITANCE; INTERPHASE; METAPHASE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY;

CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; CYTOGENETICS; GENOMICS; HISTORY, 18TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 19TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPECTRAL KARYOTYPING;

EID: 25844490588     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrg1692     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature 431, 931-945 (2004).
2. BAC Consortium. Integration of cytogenetic landmarks into the draft sequence of the human genome. Nature 409, 953-958 (2001).
3. Telenius, H. et al. Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 4, 257-263 (1992).
4. Cram, L. S., Gray, J. W. & Carter, N. P. Cytometry and genetics. Cytometry A 58, 33-36 (2004).
5. Meltzer, P. S., Guan, X. Y., Burgess, A. & Trent, J. Rapid generation of region specific probes by chromosome microdissection and their application. Nature Genet. 1, 24-28 (1992).
6. Carter, N. P. et al. Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics. J. Med. Genet. 29, 299-307 (1992).
7. Nederlof, P. M. et al. Three color fluorescence in situ hybridization for the simultaneous detection of multiple nucleic acid sequences. Cytometry 10, 20-27 (1989).
8. Nederlof, P. M., van der Flier, S., Vrolijk, J., Tanke, H. J. & Raap, A. K. Fluorescence ratio measurements of double labeled probes for multiple in situ hybridization by digital imaging microscopy. Cytometry 13, 839-845 (1992).
9. Speicher, M. R., Ballard, S. G. & Ward, D. C. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nature Genet. 12, 368-375 (1996).
10. Schröck, E. et al. Multicolor spectra karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science 273, 494-497 (1996). References 9 and 10 describe the first 24-colour hybridizations for a FISH-based classification of all human chromosomes.
11. Tanke, H. J. et al. New strategy for multi-colour fluorescence in situ hybridisation: COBRA: Combined Binary RAtio labelling. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 7, 2-11 (1999).
12. Fauth, C. & Speicher, M. R. Classifying by colors: FISH-based genome analysis. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 93, 1-10 (2001).
13. Azofeifa, J. et al. An optimized probe set for the detection of small interchromosomal aberrations by 24-color FISH. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 1684-1688 (2000).
14. Brown, J. et al. Subtelomeric chromosome rearrangements are detected using an innovative 12-colour FISH assay (M-TEL). Nature Med. 7, 497-501 (2001).
15. Fauth, C. et al. A new strategy for the detection of subtelomeric rearrangements. Hum. Genet. 109, 576-583 (2001).
16. Müller, S., O'Brien, P. C., Ferguson-Smith, M. A. & Wienberg, J. Cross-species colour segmenting: a novel tool in human karyotype analysis. Cytometry 33, 445-452 (1998).
17. Chudoba, I. et al. High resolution multicolor-banding: a new technique for refined FISH analysis of human chromosomes. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 84, 156-160 (1999).
18. Mitelman, F., Johansson, B. & Mertens, F. Fusion genes and rearranged genes as a linear function of chromosome aberrations in cancer. Nature Genet. 36, 331-334 (2004).
19. Kallioniemi, A. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258, 818-821 (1992). This is the first use of comparative genomic hybridization to map genomic imbalances, a method that is now extensively used for clinical and research applications.
20. du Manoir, S. et al. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization. Hum. Genet. 90, 590-610 (1993).
21. Speicher, M. R. et al. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of archived, paraffin embedded solid tumors by comparative genomic hybridization after universal PCR. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2, 1907-1914 (1993).
22. Speicher, M. R. et al. Correlation of microscopic phenotype with genotype in a formalin fixed, paraffin embedded testicular germ cell tumor using universal DNA amplification, comparative genomic hybridization and interphase cytogenetics. Am. J. Pathol. 146, 1332-1340 (1995).
23. Wiltshire, R. N. et al. Direct visualization of the clonal progression of primary cutaneous melanoma: application of tissue microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res. 55, 3954-3957 (1995).
24. Klein, C. A. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4494-4499 (1999).
25. Wells, D., Sherlock, J. K., Handyside, A. H. & Delhanty, J. D. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 1214-1218 (1999).
26. Voullaire, L., Wilton, L., Slater, H. & Williamson, R. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat. Diagnosis 19, 846-851 (1999). References 24-26 were the first demonstrations that an unbiased amplification of the genome of a single cell for subsequent CGH analysis is possible.
27. Wilton, L., Williamson, R., McBain, J., Edgar, D. & Voullaire, L. Birth of a healthy infant after preimplantation confirmation of euploidy by comparative genomic hybridization. New Eng. J. Med. 345, 1537-1541 (2001).
28. Wells, D. et al. First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertil. Steril. 78, 543-549 (2002).
29. Schmidt-Kittler, O. et al. From latent disseminated cells to overt metastasis: genetic analysis of systemic breast cancer progression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7737-7742 (2003).
30. Gangnus, R., Langer, S., Breit, S., Pantel, K. & Speicher, M. R. Genomic profiling of viable and proliferative micrometastatic cells from early stage breast cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 3457-3464 (2004).
31. Langer, S., Geigl, J. B., Gangnus, R. & Speicher, M. R. Sequential application of interphase-FISH and CGH to single cells. Lab. Invest. 85, 582-592 (2005).
32. van den Engh, G., Sachs, R. & Trask, B. J. Estimating genomic distance from DNA sequence location in cell nuclei by a random walk model. Science 257, 1410-1412 (1992).
33. Trask, B. J. Fluorescence in situ hybridization: applications in cytogenetics and gene mapping. Trends Genet. 7, 149-154 (1991).
34. Tkachuk, D. et al. Detection of bcr-abl fusion in chronic myelogeneous leukemia by in situ hybridization. Science 250, 559-562 (1990).
35. Arnoldus, E. P., et al. Detection of the Philadelphia chromosome in interphase nuclei. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 54, 108-111 (1990).
36. Hicks, D. G. & Tubbs, R. R. Assessment of the HER2 status in breast cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization: a technical review with interpretive guidelines. Hum. Pathol. 36, 250-261 (2005).
37. Chin, K. et al. In situ analyses of genome instability in breast cancer. Nature Genet. 36, 984-988 (2004). An impressive example of the use of FISH on tissue sections to investigate the first steps of tumorigenesis.
38. Pantel, K. & Brakenhoff, R. H. Dissecting the metastatic cascade. Nature Rev. Cancer 4, 448-456 (2004).
39. Solakoglu, O. et al. Heterogeneous proliferate potential of occult metastatic cells in bone marrow of patients with solid epithelial tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2246-2251 (2002).
40. Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature 386, 623-627 (1997).
41. Heng, H. H., Squire, J. & Tsui, L. C. High-resolution mapping of mammalian genes by in situ hybridization to free chromatin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9509-9513 (1992).
42. Parra, I. & Windle, B. High resolution visual mapping of stretched DNA by fluorescent hybridization. Nature Genet. 5, 17-21 (1993).
43. Fidlerova, H., Senger, G., Kost, M., Sanseau, P. & Sheer, D. Two simple procedures for releasing chromatin from routinely fixed cells for fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 65, 203-205 (1994).
44. Bensimon, A. et al. Alignment and sensitive detection of DNA by a moving interface. Science 265, 2096-2098 (1994).
45. Florijn, R. J. et al. High-resolution DNA fiber-FISH for genomic DNA mapping and colour bar-coding of large genes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 831-836 (1995).
46. Bentley, D. R. et al. The physical maps for sequencing human chromosomes 1, 6, 9, 10, 13, 20 and X. Nature 409, 942-943 (2001).
47. Solinas-Toldo, S. et al. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 20, 399-407 (1997).
48. Pinkel, D. et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variations using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nature Genet. 20, 207-211 (1998). References 47 and 48 were the first demonstrations that high-resolution copy number estimations on high-density arrays are feasible.
49. Snijders, A. M. et al. Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Nature Genet. 29, 263-264 (2001).
50. Fiegler, H. et al. DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP-PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 36, 361-374 (2003).
51. Veltman, J. A. et al. High-throughput analysis of subtelomeric chromosome rearrangements by use of array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70, 1269-1276 (2002).
52. Schwaenen, C. et al. Automated array-based genomic profiling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: development of a clinical tool and discovery of recurrent genomic alterations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1039-1044 (2004).
53. Ishkanian, A. S. et al. A tiling resolution DNA microarray with complete coverage of the human genome. Nature Genet. 36, 299-303 (2004).
54. Krzywinski, M. et al. A set of BAC clones spanning the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 3651-3660 (2004).
55. Pollack, J. R. et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nature Genet. 23, 41-46 (1999).
56. Dhami, P et al. Exon array CGH: detection of copy-number changes at the resolution of individual exons in the human genome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 750-762 (2005).
57. Carvalho, B., Ouwerkerk, E., Meijer, G. A. & Ylstra, B. High resolution microarray comparative genomic hybridisation analysis using spotted oligonucleotides. J. Clin. Pathol. 57, 644-646 (2004).
58. Barrett, M. T. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization using oligonucleotide microarrays and total genomic DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17765-17770 (2004).
59. Lucito, R. et al. Representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis: a high-resolution method to detect genome copy number variation. Genome Res. 13, 2291-2305 (2003).
60. Lindblad-Toh, K. et al. Loss-of-heterozygosity analysis of small-cell lung carcinomas using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Nature Biotechnol. 18, 1001-1005 (2000).
61. Bignell, G. R. et al. High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number using oligonucleotide microarrays. Genome Res. 14, 287-295 (2004).
62. Zhao, X et al. An integrated view of copy number and allelic alterations in the cancer genome using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Cancer Res. 64, 3060-3071 (2004). References 57-62 describe the use of array technologies, which currently provide the highest resolution for array-based copy number analysis.
63. Kennedy, G. C. et al. Large-scale genotyping of complex DNA. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 1233-1237 (2003).
64. Matsuzaki, H. et al. Genotyping over 100,000 SNPs on a pair of oligonucleotide arrays. Nature Methods 1, 109-111 (2004).
65. Raghavan, M. et al. Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism analysis reveals frequent partial uniparental disomy due to somatic recombination in acute myeloid leukemias. Cancer Res. 65, 375-378 (2005).
66. Vissers, L. E. et al. Mutations in a new member of the chromodomain gene family cause CHARGE syndrome. Nature Genet. 36, 955-957 (2004). A beautiful demonstration of how array CGH can identify a long-sought disease locus.
67. Sebat, J. et al. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 305, 525-528 (2004).
68. Iafrate, A. J. et al. Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nature Genet. 36, 949-951 (2004).
69. Sharp, A. J. et al. Segmental duplications and copy-number variation in the human genome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 77, 78-88 (2005).
70. Fiegler, H. et al. Array painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes using DNA microarrays. J. Med. Genet. 40, 664-670 (2003).
71. Gribble, S. M. et al. The complex nature of constitutional de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients presenting with abnormal phenotypes. J. Med. Genet. 42, 8-16 (2005).
72. Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 396, 643-649 (1998).
73. Gilbert, N. et al. Chromatin architecture of the human genome: gene-rich domains are enriched in open chromatin fibers. Cell 118, 555-566 (2004).
74. d'Adda di Magagna, F. et al. A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence. Nature 426, 194-198 (2003).
75. Kondo, Y., Shen, L., Yan, P. S., Huang, T. H. & Issa, J. P. Chromatin immunoprecipitation microarrays for identification of genes silenced by histone H3 lysine 9 methylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 7398-7403 (2004).
76. Dutrillaux, B., Couturier, J., Richer, C. L. & Viegas-Pequignot, E. Sequence of DNA replication in 277 R and Q-bands of human chromosomes using a BrdU treatment. Chromosoma 58, 51-61 (1976).
77. Ganner, E. & Evans, H. J. The relationship between patterns of DNA replication and of quinacrine fluorescence in the human chromosome complement. Chromosoma 35, 326-341 (1971).
78. Holmquist, G., Gray, M., Porter, T. & Jordan, J. Characterization of Giemsa dark- and light-band DNA. Cell 31, 121-129 (1982).
79. Watanabe, Y. et al. Chromosome-wide assessment of replication timing for human chromosomes 11q and 21q: disease-related genes in timing-switch regions. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 13-21 (2002).
80. Sinnett, D., Flint, A. & Lalande, M. Determination of DNA replication kinetics in synchronized human cells using a PCR-based assay. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3227-3232 (1993).
81. Selig, S., Okumura, K., Ward, D. C. & Cedar, H. Delineation of DNA replication time zones by fluorescence in situ hybridization. EMBO J. 11, 1217-1225 (1992).
82. Singh, N., et al. Coordination of the random asynchronous replication of autosomal loci. Nature Genet. 33, 339-341 (2003).
83. Raghuraman, M. K., et al. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294, 115-121 (2001).
84. Schubeler, D. et al. Genome-wide DNA replication profile for Drosophila melanogaster. a link between transcription and replication timing. Nature Genet. 32, 438-442 (2002).
85. Woodfine K. et al. Replication timing of the human genome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 191-202 (2004).
86. Woodfine K. et al. Replication timing of human chromosome 6. Cell Cycle 4, 172-176 (2005).
87. Cremer, T. & Cremer, C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 292-301 (2001).
88. Fisher, A. G. & Merkenschlager, M. Gene silencing, cell fate and nuclear organisation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12, 193-197 (2002).
89. Cremer, T., Küpper, K., Dietzel, S. & Fakan, S. Higher order chromatin architecture in the cell nucleus: on the way from structure to function. Biol. Cell 96, 555-567 (2004).
90. Bolzer, A. et al. Three-dimensional maps of all chromosome positions indicate a probabilistic order in human male fibroblast nuclei and prometaphase rosettes. PLoS Biol. 3, e157 (2005).
91. Croft, J. A. et al. Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J. Cell Biol. 145, 1119-1131 (1999).
92. Cremer, M. et al. Inheritance of gene density-related higher order chromatin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nuclei. J. Cell Biol. 162, 809-820 (2003).
93. Sun, H. B., Shen, J. & Yokota, H. Size-dependent positioning of human chromosomes in interphase nuclei. Biophys. J. 79, 184-190 (2000).
94. Spilianakis, C. G., Lalioti, M. D., Town, T., Lee, G. R. & Flavell, R. A. Interchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci. Nature 435, 637-645 (2005).
95. Belmont, A. Dynamics of chromatin, proteins, and bodies within the cell nucleus. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 304-310 (2003).
96. Spector, D. L. The dynamics of chromosome organization and gene regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72, 573-608 (2003).
97. Wang, T. L. et al. Digital karyotyping. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16156-16161 (2002).
98. Nilsson, M. et al. Padlock probes: circularizing oligonucleotides for localized DNA detection. Science 265, 2085-2088 (1994).
99. Lizardi, P. M. et al. Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nature Genet. 19, 225-232 (1998).
100. Zhong, X. B., Lizardi, P. M., Huang, X. H., Bray-Ward, P. L. & Ward, D. C. Visualization of oligonucleotide probes and point mutations in interphase nuclei and DNA fibers using rolling circle DNA amplification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3940-3945 (2001).
101. Lage, J. M. et al. Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH. Genome Res. 13, 294-307 (2003).
102. Zardo, G. et al. Integrated genomic and epigenomic analyses pinpoint biallelic gene inactivation in tumors. Nature Genet. 32, 453-458 (2002).
103. Garraway, L. A. et al. Integrative genomic analyses identify MITF as a lineage survival oncogene amplified in malignant melanoma. Nature 436, 117-122 (2005).
104. Velagaleti, G. V. et al. Position effects due to chromosome breakpoints that map approximately 900 Kb upstream and approximately 13 Mb downstream of SOX9 in two patients with campomelic dysplasia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 652-662 (2005).
105. Inoue, K. et al. Genomic rearrangements resulting in PLP1 deletion occur by nonhomologous end joining and cause different dysmyelinating phenotypes in males and females. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71, 838-853 (2002).
106. Tuzun, E. et al. Fine-scale structural variation of the human genome. Nature Genet. 37, 727-732 (2005).
107. Arnold, J. Beobachtungen über Kerntheilungen in den Zellen der Geschwülste. Virchows Archiv 78, 279-301 (1879) (in German).
108. Flemming, W. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Zelle und ihrer Lebenserscheinungen. 3. Teil. Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie 20, 1-86 (1881) (in German).
109. Hansemann, D. Über asymmetrische Zellteilung in Epithelkrebsen und deren biologische Bedeutung. Arch. Pathol. Anat. 119, 299-326 (1890) (in German).
110. Tjio, J. H. & Levan, A. The chromosome number of man. Hereditas 42, 1-6 (1956).
111. Ford, C. E. & Hamerton, J. L. The chromosomes of man. Nature 178, 1020-1023 (1956).
112. Lejeune, J. M., Gautier, M. & Turpin, R. Etude des chromosomes somatiques de neuf enfants mongoliens. CR Acad. Sci. Paris 248, 1721-1722 (1958) (in French).
113. Jacobs, P. A. & Strong, J. A. A case of human intersexuality having a possible XXY sex-determining mechanism. Nature 183, 302-303 (1959).
114. Ford, C. E., Jones, K. W., Polani, P. E., De Almeida, J. C. & Briggs, J. H. A sex-chromosome anomaly in a case of gonadal dysgenesis (Turner's syndrome). Lancet 1, 711-713 (1959).
115. Nowell, P. C. & Hungerford, D. A. A minute chromosome in human chronic granulocytic leukemia Science 132, 1497 (1960).
116. Caspersson, T., Zech, L. & Johansson, C. Analysis of human metaphase chromosome set by aid of DNA-binding fluorescent agents. Exp. Cell Res. 62, 490-492 (1970).
117. Rowley, J. D. A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining. Nature 243, 290-293 (1973).
118. Gall, J. G. & Pardue, M. L. Formation and detection of RNA-DNA hybrid molecules in cytological preparations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 63, 378-383 (1969).
119. Rudkin, G. T. & Stollar, B. D. High resolution detection of DNA-RNA hybrids in situ by indirect immunofluorescence. Nature 265, 472-473 (1977).
120. Bauman, J. G., Wiegant, J., Borst, P. & van Duijn, P. A new method for fluorescence microscopical localization of specific DNA sequences by in situ hybridization of fluorochromelabelled RNA. Exp. Cell Res. 128, 485-490 (1980).
121. Langer, P. R., Waldrop, A. A. & Ward, D. C. Enzymatic synthesis of biotin-labeled polynucleotides: novel nucleic acid affinity probes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 6633-6637 (1981).
122. Landegent, J. E., Jansen in de Wal, N., Dirks, R. W., Baas, F. & van der Ploeg, M. Use of whole cosmid cloned genomic sequences for chromosomal localization by non-radioactive in situ hybridization. Hum. Genet. 77, 366-370 (1987).
123. Pinkel, D. et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 9138-9142 (1988).
124. Lichter, P., Cremer, T., Borden, J., Manuelidis, L. & Ward, D. C. Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries. Hum. Genet. 80, 224-234 (1988).
125. Cremer, T., Lichter, P., Borden, J., Ward, D. C. & Manuelidis, L. Detection of chromosome aberrations in metaphase and interphase tumor cells by in situ hybridization using chromosome-specific library probes. Hum. Genet. 80, 235-246 (1988).
126. Albertson, D. G. et al. Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors. Nature Genet. 34, 369-376 (2003).