Sequential application of interphase-FISH and CGH to single cells

Laboratory Investigation

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 582-592

  Langer, Sabine ^a,b   Geigl, Jochen B ^a,b   Gangnus, Rainer ^a,b,c   Speicher, Michael R ^a,b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^c PALM Microlaser Technologies AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization; Single cell analysis; Single cell comparative genomic hybridization; Tumor heterogeneity; Unbiased whole genome amplification

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER GENETICS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE AMPLIFICATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTERPHASE; LASER MICRODISSECTION; LEUKEMIA; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRISOMY 13; TRISOMY 18; TRISOMY 21;

IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; INTERPHASE; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION;

EID: 17144427693     PISSN: 00236837     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700249     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Klein CA, Schmidt-Kittler O, Schardt JA, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:4494-4499.
2. Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, et al. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation. Nucleic Acids Res 1999;27:1214-1218.
3. Voullaire L, Wilton L, Slater H, et al. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat Diagnosis 1999;19:846-851.
4. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature 1997;386:623-627.
5. Abdel-Rahman WM, Katsura K, Rens W, et al. Spectral karyotyping suggests additional subsets of colorectal cancers characterized by pattern of chromosome rearrangement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:2538-2543.
6. Bunz F, Fauth C, Speicher MR, et al. Targeted inactivation of p53 in human cells does not result in aneuploidy. Cancer Res 2002;62:1129-1133.
7. Uhrig S, Schuffenhauer S, Fauth C, et al. Multiplex-FISH (M-FISH) for pre- and postnatal diagnostic applications. Am J Hum Genet 1999;65:448-462.
8. Maierhofer C, Gangnus R, Diebold J, et al. Multicolor deconvolution microscopy of thick biological specimens. Am J Path 2003;162:373-379.
9. Speicher MR, Ballard SG, Ward DC. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nat Genet 1996;12:368-375.
10. Eils R, Uhrig S, Saracoglu K, et al. An optimized, fully automated system for fast and accurate identification of chromosomal rearrangements by multiplex-FISH (M-FISH). Cytogenet Cell Genet 1998;82:160-171.
11. Azofeifa J, Fauth C, Kraus J, et al. An optimized probe set for the detection of small interchromosomal aberrations by 24-color FISH. Am J Hum Genet 2000;66:1684-1688.
12. Schütze K, Lahr G. Identification of expressed genes by laser-mediated manipulation of single cells. Nat Biotechnol 1998;16:737-742.
13. Gangnus R, Langer S, Breit S, et al. Genomic profiling of viable and proliferative micrometastatic cells from early stage breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3457-3464.
14. Thalhammer S, Langer S, Speicher MR, et al. Generation of chromosome painting probes from single chromosomes by laser microdissection and linker-adaptor PCR. Chrom Res 2004;12:337-343.
15. Snijders AM, Nowak N, Segraves R, et al. Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Nat Genet 2001;29:263-264.
16. du Manoir S, Speicher MR, Joos S, et al. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 1993;90:590-610.
17. Weimer J, Kiechle M, Arnold N. FISH-microdissection (FISH-MD) analysis of complex chromosome rearrangements. Cytogenet Cell Genet 2000;88:114-118.
18. Wilton L, Williamson R, McBain J, et al. Birth of a healthy infant after preimplantation confirmation of euploidy by comparative genomic hybridization. New Eng J Med 2001;345:1537-1541.
19. Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B, et al. First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 2002;78:543-549.
20. Wilton L, Voullaire L, Sargeant P, et al. Preimplantation aneuploidy screening using comparative genomic hybridization of fluorescence in situ hybridization of embryos from patients with recurrent implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2003;80:860-870.
21. Klein CA, Blankenstein TJ, Schmidt-Kittler O, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of single disseminated tumour cells in minimal residual cancer. Lancet 2002;360:683-689.
22. Schmidt-Kittler O, Ragg T, Daskalakis A, et al. From latent disseminated cells to overt metastasis: genetic analysis of systemic breast cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:7737-7742.
23. Bentz M, Plesch A, Stilgenbauer S, et al. Minimal sizes of deletions detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chrom Cancer 1998;21:172-175,
24. Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S, et al. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chrom Cancer 1997;20:399-407.
25. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 1998;20:207-211.
26. Fiegler H, Carr P, Douglas EJ, et al. DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP-PCR amplification of BAG and PAC clones. Genes Chromosome Cancer 2003;36;361-374.