Cultural representations of gender and science: Portrayals of female scientists and engineers in popular films

Science Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-63

  Steinke, Jocelyn ^a  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural representations of gender; Female scientists and engineers; Gender and science; Popular films

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944589684     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547005278610     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. American Association of University Women. 1998. Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
2. _. 2000. Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
3. Andre, T., M. Whigham, A. Hendrickson, and S. Chambers. 1999. Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (6): 719-47.
4. Archer, S. L. 1985. Identity and the choice of social roles. In Identity in adolescence: Processes and contents (New directions for child development, Vol. 30), edited by A. S. Waterman, 79-99. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Baker, D., and R. Leary. 1995. Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32 (1): 255-65.
6. Baker-Sperry, L., and L. Grauerholz. 2003. The pervasiveness and persistence of the feminine beauty ideal in children's fairy tales. Gender & Society 15 (5): 711-26.
7. Bandura, A. 1969. Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. In Handbook of socialization theory and research, edited by D. A. Goslin, 213-62. Chicago: Rand McNally.
8. _. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Bandura, A., D. Ross, and S. A. Ross. 1963a. A comparative test of the status envy, social power, and secondary reinforcement theories of identificatory learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67 (6): 527-34.
10. _. 1963b. Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66(1): 2-11.
11. Barman, C. R. 1997. Students' views of scientists and science: Results from a national study. Science and Children (September): 18-23.
12. Bem, S. L. 1981. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review 88 (4): 354-64.
13. _. 1993. The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual identity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14. _. 1994. In a male-centered world, female differences are transformed into female disadvantages. Chronicle of Higher Education (August 17): B1-B3.
15. Bernt, P. W., J. P. Bernt, and S. V. Turner. 2003a. Gender patterns in middle school students' media use. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April.
16. _. 2003b. Getting the media message http://www.csm.ohiou.edu/ mediamessage/findings.htm.
17. Beuf, A. 1974. Doctor, lawyer, household drudge. Journal of Communication 24:142-45.
18. Bigler, R. S. 1995. The role of classification skill in moderating environmental influences on children's gender stereotyping: A study of the functional use of gender in the classroom. Child Development 66:1072-87.
19. Brown, L. M., and C. Gilligan. 1992. Meeting at the crossrooads: Women's psychology and girls' development. New York: Ballantine.
20. Carter, D. B., and G. D. Levy. 1988. Cognitive aspects of early sex-role development: The influence of gender schemas on preschoolers' memories and preferences for sex-typed toys and activities. Child Development 59:782-92.
21. Chambers, D. W. 1983. Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education 67 (2): 255-65.
22. College Board Online. 1997. College-bound seniors, http://www. collegeboard.org/press/ senior97/table14.html.
23. Coltrane, S., and M. Messineo. 2000. The perpetuation of subtle prejudice: Race and gender imagery in 1990s television advertising. Sex Roles 42 (5/6): 363-89.
24. Comstock, G., and E. Scharrer. 2001. The use of television and other film-related media. In Handbook of children and the media, edited by D. Singer and J. Singer, 47-72. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Dietz, T. L. 1998. An examination of violence and gender role portrayals in video games: Implications for gender socialization and aggressive behavior. Sex Roles 38 (5/6): 425-42.
26. Dundes, L. 2001. Disney's modern heroine Pocahontas: Revealing age-old gender stereotypes and role discontinuity under a facade of liberation. Social Science Journal 38 (3): 353-65.
27. Edelbrock, C., and A. J. Sugawara. 1978. Acquisition of sex-typed preferences in preschoolaged children. Developmental Psychology 14 (6): 614-23.
28. Elasmar, M., K. Hasegawa, and M. Brain. 1999. The portrayal of women in U.S. prime time television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 44 (1): 20-34.
29. Erkut, S., J. P. Fields, R. Sing, and F. Marx. 1996. Diversity in girls' experiences: Feeling good about who you are. In Urban adolescent girls: Resisting stereotypes, edited by B. Leadbeater and N. Way, 53-64. New York: New York University.
30. Erkut, S., F. Marx, J. P. Fields, and R. Sing. 1999. Raising confident and competent girls: One size does not fit all. In Gender, culture and ethnicity, edited by L. A. Peplau, S. C. DeBro, R. C. Veniegas, and P. L. Taylor, 83-101. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
31. Faber, R. J., J. D. Brown, and J. M. McLeod. 1979. Coming of age in the global village: Television and adolescence. In Children communicating: Media and the development of thought, speech, understanding, edited by Ellen Wartella, 215-49. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32. Farmer, H., S. Rotella, C. Anderson, and J. Wardrop. 1998. Gender differences in science, math, and technology careers: Prestige level and Holland Interest Type. Journal of Vocational Behavior 53:73-96.
33. Fiebert, M.S. 1990. Dimensions of the female roles. Psychological Reports 67:633-34.
34. Flicker, E. 2003. Between brains and breasts - Women scientists in fiction film: On the marginalization and sexualization of scientific competence. Public Understanding of Science 12 (4): 307-18.
35. Fort, D. C., and H. L. Varney. 1989. How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children 26 (8): 8-13.
36. Fujioka, Y. 1999. Television portrayals and African-American stereotypes: Examination of television effects when direct contact is lacking. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 76 (1): 52-75.
37. Griffin, R. J., S. Sen, and R. Plotkin. 1994. Sex, schemata, and social status: TV character identification and occupational aspirations among adolescents. In Differences that make a difference: Examining the assumptions in gender research, edited by L. H. Turner and H. M. Sterk, 85-97. Westport, CT: Bergin Garvey.
38. Hamilton, D. L., S. J. Sherman, and C. M. Ruvolo. 1990. Stereotype-based expectancies: Effects on information processing and social behavior. Journal of Social Behavior 46 (2): 35-60.
39. Hanson, S. L. 2000. Gender, families, and science: Influences on early science training and career choices. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 6:169-87.
40. Henke, J. B., D. Z. Umble, and N. J. Smith. 1996. Construction of the female self: Feminist readings of the Disney heroine. Women's Studies in Communication 19 (2): 229-49.
41. Hill, J., and M. Lynch. 1983. The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In Girls at puberty: Biological and psychosocial perspectives, edited by J. Brooks-Gunn and A. Petersen, 201-28. New York: Plenum.
42. Hoerner, K. L. 1996. Gender roles in Disney films: Analyzing behaviors from Snow White to Simba. Women's Studies in Communication 19 (2): 213-28.
43. Hort, B. E., M. D. Leinbach, and B. I. Fagot. 1991. Is there coherence among the cognitive components of gender acquisition? Sex Roles 24 (3/4): 195-207.
44. Huston, A.C., and M. M. Alvarez. 1990. The socialization context of gender role development in early adolescence. In From childhood to adolescence: A transitional period? edited by R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, and T. P. Gullotta, 156-79. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. Internet Movie Database. 2001. Home page. http://www.us.imdb.com.
46. Jacobowitz, T. 1983. Relationship of sex, achievement, and science self-concept to the science career preferences of Black students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20 (7): 621-28.
47. Johnston, D. D., and D. H. Swanson. 2003. Invisible mothers: A content analysis of motherhood ideologies and myths in magazines. Sex Roles 49 (1/2): 21-33.
48. Kahle, J. B. 1989. Images of scientists: Gender issues in science classrooms. The Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics, No. 4, December.
49. Kaiser Family Foundation. 1999. Kids and media at the new millennium: A comprehensive national analysis of children's media use. http://www.kff.org/ content/1999/1535/ChartPack.pdf.
50. Kelly, A. 1978. Girls and science: An international study of sex differences in school science achievement. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
51. Kelly, A., and B. Smail. 1986. Sex stereotypes and attitudes to science among eleven-year-old children. British Journal of Educational Psychology 56:158-68.
52. Larson, M. S. 1996. Sex roles and soap operas: What adolescents learn about single motherhood. Sex Roles 35 (1/2): 91-110.
53. Lauzen, M. M., and D. M. Dozier. 1999. Making a difference in prime time: Women on screen and behind the scenes in the 1995-96 television season. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 43 (1): 1-19.
54. Lee, J. D. 1998. Which kids can become scientists? Effects of gender, self-concepts, and perceptions of scientists. Social Psychology Quarterly 16 (3): 199-219.
55. Levy, G. D., and B. Carter. 1989. Gender schema, gender constancy, and gender-role knowledge: The roles of cognitive factors in preschoolers' gender-role stereotype attributions. Developmental Psychology 25 (3): 444-49.
56. Levy, G. D., A. L. Sadovsky, and G. L. Troseth. 2000. Aspects of young children's perceptions of gender-typed occupations. Sex Roles 42 (11/12): 993-1006.
57. Liben, L. S., and M. L. Signorella. 1993. Gender-schematic processing in children: The role of initial interpretations of stimuli. Developmental Psychology 29 (1): 141-49.
58. Lips, H. M. 1992. Gender- and science-related attitudes as predictors of college students' academic choices. Journal of Vocational Behavior 40:62-81.
59. Lobel, T. E., and J. Menashri. 1993. Relations of conceptions of gender-role transgressions and gender constancy to gender-typed toy preferences. Developmental Psychology 29 (1): 150-55.
60. Long, M., G. Boiarsky, and G. Thayer. 2001. Gender and racial counter-stereotypes in science education television: A content analysis. Public Understanding of Science 10 (3): 255-69.
61. Lupaschuk, D., and C. Yewchuk. 1998. Student perceptions of gender roles: Implications for counsellors. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling 20:301-18.
62. Maccoby, E., and W. C. Wilson. 1957. Identification and observational learning from films. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 55:76-87.
63. Maoldomhnaigh, M. O., and A. Hunt. 1988. Some factors affecting the image of the scientists drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science and Technological Education 6 (2): 159-66.
64. Massoni, K. 2004. Modeling work: Occupational messages in Seventeen magazine. Gender & Society 18(1): 47-65.
65. Matthews, B. 1996. Drawing scientists. Gender and Education 8 (2): 231-43.
66. Mazzarella, S. R., and N. O. Pecora. 1999. Growing up girls: Popular culture and the construction of identity. New York: Peter Lang.
67. Mead, M., and R. Metraux. 1957. Image of the scientist among high-school students. Science 126:384-90.
68. Miles, M., and A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69. Morgan, M. 1982. Television and adolescents' sex role stereotypes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43 (5): 947-55.
70. Movie Box Office. 2001. Movie box office reports, http://www.about.com.
71. National Science Foundation. 2000. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering, http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf00327.
72. _. 2003. New formulas for America's workforce: Girls in science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
73. Newton, L. D., and D. P. Newton. 1998. Primary children's conceptions of science and the scientists: Is the impact of a national curriculum breaking down the stereotype? International Journal of Science Education 20 (9): 1137-49.
74. Nihlen, A. S., and B. A. Bailey. 1988. Children's display of gender schemas through interaction with nontraditional workers. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 19:155-62.
75. O'Bryant, S. L., and C. R. Corder-Bolz. 1978. The effects of television on children's stereotyping of women's work roles. Journal of Vocational Behavior 12:233-44.
76. Orenstein, P. 1994. School girls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Doubleday.
77. Phillips, L. 1998. The girls report: What we know and need to know about growing up female. New York: National Council for Research on Women.
78. Pierce, K. 1993. Socialization of teenage girls through teen-magazine fiction: The making of a new woman or an old lady? Sex Roles 29 (1/2): 59-68.
79. Pierce, K. 1997. Women's magazine fiction: A content analysis of the roles, attributes, and occupations of main characters. Sex Roles 37 (7/8): 581-93.
80. Rosenthal, D. B. 1993. Images of scientists: A comparison of biology and liberal studies majors. School Science and Mathematics 93 (4): 212-16.
81. Rosser, S. V., and M. Zieseniss. 2000. Career issues and laboratory climates: Different challenges and opportunities for women engineers and scientists (survey of fiscal year 1997 POWRE awardees). Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 6:95-114.
82. Ruble, D. F., and C. Stangor. 1986. Stalking the elusive schema: Insights from developmental and social psychological analyses of gender schemas. Social Cognition 4:227-61.
83. Ruvolo, A. P., and H. R. Markus. 1992. Possible selves and performance: The power of self-relevant imagery. Social Cognition 10 (1): 95-124.
84. Schank, R., and R. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85. Serbin, L. A., and C. Sprafkin. 1986. The salience of gender and the process of sex typing in three-to seven-year-old children. Child Development 57:1188-99.
86. Signorella, M. L., R. S. Bigler, and L. S. Liben. 1993. Developmental differences in children's gender schemata and others: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review 13:147-83.
87. Signorelli, N. 1997. A content analysis: Reflections of girls in the media. Report for the Kaiser Family Foundation and Children Now. http://www.kff.org/entmedia/1260-gendr.cfm.
88. Slater, A., and M. Tiggemann. 2002. A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles 46 (9/10): 343-49.
89. Song, J., and K. Kim. 1999. How Korean students see scientists: The images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education 21 (9): 957-77.
90. Steinke, J. 1997. A portrait of a woman as a scientist: Breaking down barriers created by gender-role stereotypes. Public Understanding of Science 6 (4): 409-28.
91. _. 1998. Connecting theory and practice: Women scientist role models in television programming. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 42:142-51.
92. _. 1999. Women scientist role models on screen: A case study of Contact. Science Communication 21:111-36.
93. _. 2004. Science in Cyberspace: Science and engineering World Wide Web sites for girls. Public Understanding of Science 13 (1): 7-30.
94. Steinke, J., and M. Long. 1996. A lab of her own? Portrayals of female characters on children's educational science programs. Science Communication 18 (2): 91-115.
95. Tan, A., Y. Fujioka, and N. Lucht. 1997. Native American stereotypes, TV portrayals, and personal contact. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 74 (2): 265-84.
96. Tenenbaum, H. R., and C. Leaper. 2003. Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities. Developmental Psychology 39 (1): 34-47.
97. Turner-Bowker, D. M. 1996. Gender stereotyped descriptors in children's picture books: Does "Curious Jane" exist in the literature? Sex Roles 35 (7/8): 461-88.
98. Valdivia, A. N. 1998. Clueless in Hollywood: Single moms in contemporary family movies. Journal of Communication Inquiry 22 (3): 272-92.
99. Weinraub, M., L. P. Clemens, A. Sockloff, T. Ethridge, E. Gracely, and B. Myers. 1984. The development of sex role stereotypes in the third year: Relationships to gender labeling, gender identity, sex-typed toy preference, and family characteristics. Child Development 55:1493-1503.