The phonological store of working memory: Is it phonological and is it a store?

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 656-674

  Jones, Dylan M ^a,b   Macken, William J ^a,b   Nicholls, Alastair P ^a,b,c  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c QINETIQ   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEMORY; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

HUMANS; MEMORY; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 2442542230     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.656     Document Type: Article

References (152)

1. Avons, S. E. (1998). Serial report and item recognition of novel visual patterns. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 285-308.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362-365.
3. Baddeley, A. D. (1968). How does acoustic similarity influence short-term memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20A, 249-263.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
5. Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Is working memory working? The fifteenth Bartlett lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 1-31.
6. Baddeley, A. D. (2000a). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423.
7. Baddeley, A. D. (2000b). The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 7, 544-549.
8. Baddeley, A. D., Chincotta, D., Stafford, L., & Turk, D. (2002). Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 353-369.
9. Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., & Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 233-252.
10. Baddeley, A. D., Papagno, C., & Andrade, J. (1993). The sandwich effect: The role of attentional factors in serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 862-870.
11. Baddeley, A. D., & Salamé, P. (1986). The unattended speech effect: Perception or memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 525-529.
12. Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2004). What makes words sound similar. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Banbury, S., & Berry, D. C. (1998). Disruption of office-related tasks by speech and office noise. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 499-517.
14. Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (1997). Role of serial order in the irrelevant speech effect: Tests of the changing state hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 459-471.
15. Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (1998). Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free as in serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 615-636.
16. Beaman, C. P., & Morton, J. (2000). The effects of rime on auditory recency and the suffix effect. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 51A, 919-939.
17. Beauvois, M. W., & Meddis, R. (1997). Time decay of auditory stream biasing. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 81-86.
18. Bishop, D. V. M., & Robson, J. (1989). Unimpaired short-term memory and rhyme judgment in congenitally speechless individuals: Implications for the notion of 'articulatory coding'. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 123-140.
19. Blauert, J. (1997). Spatial hearing: The psychophysics of human sound localization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Bloom, L. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1999). Two-component theory of the suffix effect: Contrary findings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1452-1475.
21. Boomer, D. S., & Laver, J. D. M. H. (1968). Slips of the tongue. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 3, 2-12.
22. Boyle, R., & Coltheart, V. (1996). Effects of irrelevant sounds on phonological coding in reading comprehension and short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 398-416.
23. Brady, S., Mann, V., & Schmidt, R. (1987). Errors in short-term memory for good readers and poor readers. Memory & Cognition, 15, 444-453.
24. Brady, S., Shankweiler, D., & Mann, V. (1983). Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 345-367.
25. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Bregman, A. S., & Rudnicky, A. I. (1975). Auditory segregation: Stream or streams? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 263-267.
27. Bridges, A. M., & Jones, D. M. (1996). Word-dose in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant speech: Phonological confusions or changing state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 919-939.
28. Buchner, A., Irmen, L., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). On the irrelevance of semantic information for the 'irrelevant speech' effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 765-779.
29. Burani, C., Vallar, G., & Bottini, G. (1991). Articulatory coding and phonological judgements on written words and pictures: The role of the phonological output buffer. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 379-398.
30. Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (1996). A connectionist model of STM for serial order. In S. Gathercole (Ed.), Models of short-term memory (pp. 51-72). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
31. Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106, 551-581.
32. Campbell, T. A., Beaman, C. P., & Berry, D. C. (2002). Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption. Memory, 10, 199-214.
33. Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (2002). Working memory and connectionist models of parsing: A response to MacDonald and Christiansen (2002). Psychological Review, 109, 66-74.
34. Carlyon, R. P., Cusak, R., Foxton, J. M., & Robertson, I. H. (2001). Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 115-127.
35. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 257-271.
36. Colle, H. A. (1980). Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 722-755.
37. Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 49-54.
38. Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75-84.
39. Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429-460.
40. Corballis, M. C. (2002). From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Crowder, R. G. (1971). Waiting for the stimulus suffix: Decay, delay, rhythm, and readout in immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 324-340.
42. Crowder, R. G. (1978). Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect. Psychological Review, 85, 502-524.
43. Crowder, R. G. (1982). Disinhibition of masking in auditory sensory memory. Memory & Cognition, 10, 424-433.
44. Crowder, R. G., & Morton, J. (1969). Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS). Perception and Psychophysics, 5, 365-373.
45. Divin, W., Coyle, K., & James, D. T. T. (2001). The effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on the serial recall of silently presented lipread lists. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 593-616.
46. Ellermeier, W., & Zimmer, K. (1997). Individual differences in the susceptibility to the 'irrelevant speech effect'. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2191-2199.
47. Ellis, A. W. (1980). Errors in speech and short-term memory: The effects of phonemic similarity and syllable position. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 624-634.
48. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
49. Farrand, P., & Jones, D.M. (1996). Direction of report in spatial and verbal serial short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 140-158.
50. Farrand, P., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Jones, D. M. (2001). Temporal-spatial memory: Retrieval of spatial information does not reduce recency. Acta Psychologica, 106, 285-301.
51. Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2002). Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 838-849.
52. Fowler, C. A., Rubin, P., Remez, R. E., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Implications for speech production of a general theory of action. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 373-420). London: Academic Press.
53. Frankish, C. F. (1985). Modality-specific grouping in short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 200-209.
54. Frankish, C. F. (1989). Perceptual organization and precategorical acoustic storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 469-479.
55. Frankish, C. F., & Turner, J. (1984). Delayed suffix effect at very short delays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 767-777.
56. Frick, R. W. (1988a). Issues of representation and limited capacity in the auditory short-term store. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 213-240.
57. Frick, R. W. (1988b). The role of memory in attenuations of the suffix effect. Memory and Cognition, 16, 15-22.
58. Frick, R. W. (1989). Explanation of grouping in immediate ordered recall. Memory & Cognition, 17, 551-562.
59. Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. J. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1-30.
60. Greenberg, S. N., & Engle, R. W. (1983). Voice changes in the stimulus suffix effect: Are the effects structural or strategic? Memory & Cognition, 11, 551-556.
61. Greene, R. L. (1991). Serial recall of two-voice lists: Implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects. Memory & Cognition, 19, 72-78.
62. Gupta, P., & MacWhinney, B. (1995). Is the articulatory loop articulatory or auditory? Reexamining the effects of concurrent articulation on immediate serial recall. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 63-88.
63. Hamilton, P., & Hockey, R. (1974). Active selection of items to be remembered: The role of timing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 61-83.
64. Hanley, J. R. (1996). Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect? Memory, 5, 423-431.
65. Hanley, J. R., & Bakopoulou, E. (2003). Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression and phonological similarity: A test of the phonological loop model and the feature model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 435-444.
66. Hanley, J. R., & Broadbent, C. (1987). The effects of unattended speech on serial recall following auditory presentation. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 287-297.
67. Hellbrück, J., Kuwano, S., & Namba, S. (1996). Irrelevant background speech and human performance: Is there long-term habituation? Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 17, 239-247.
68. Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short term memory for serial order: The start-end model. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 73-137.
69. Henson, R. N. A., Norris, D., Page, M. P. A., & Baddeley, A. (1996). Unchained memory: Error patterns rule out chaining models of immediate serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49A, 80-115.
70. Hintzman, D. L. (1967). Articulatory coding in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 312-316.
71. Hitch, G. J. (1975). The role of attention in visual and auditory suffix effects. Memory & Cognition, 3, 501-505.
72. Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2003). A negative order-repetition priming effect: Inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 199-218.
73. Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (in press). An order-Stroop effect: The impact of order incongruence between seen and heard sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
74. Jones, D. M. (1993). Objects, streams and threads of auditory attention. In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness & control (pp. 87-103). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
75. Jones, D. M., Alford, D., Bridges, A., Tremblay, S., & Macken, W. J. (1999). Organizational factors in selective attention: The interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 464-473.
76. Jones, D. M., Farrand, P., Stuart, G., & Morris, N. (1995). Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1008-1018.
77. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 369-381.
78. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1995a). Auditory babble and cognitive efficiency: Role of number of voices and their location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 216-226.
79. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1995b). Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: The role of spatial location and timing. Memory & Cognition, 23, 192-200.
80. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1995c). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within- or between-stream similarity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 103-115.
81. Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., & Mosdell, N. (1997). The role of habituation in the disruption of recall performance by irrelevant sound. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 549-564.
82. Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., & Murray, A. C. (1993). Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation. Memory & Cognition, 21, 318-328.
83. Jones, D. M., Madden, C., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 645-669.
84. Jones, D. M., Saint-Aubin, J., & Tremblay, S. (1999). Streaming by spatial location of irrelevant sound: further evidence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52A, 545-554.
85. Jones, D. M., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 550-558.
86. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
87. Klatte, M., Kilcher, H., & Hellbrück, J. (1995). The effects of temporal structure of background noise on working memory. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 42, 517-544.
88. Klatte, M., Lee, N., & Helbrück, J. (2002). Effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on serial recall of heard and read materials. Psychologische Beiträge, Band 44, 166-186.
89. Larsen, J. D., Baddeley, A. D., & Andrade, J. (2000). Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: Implications for models of short-term verbal memory. Memory, 8, 145-158.
90. LeCompte, D. C. (1994). Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1396-1408.
91. LeCompte, D. C. (1995). An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 391-397.
92. LeCompte, D. C. (1996). Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal and temporal distinctiveness: A new approach to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1154-1165.
93. LeCompte, D. C., & Shaibe, D. M. (1997). On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A, 100-118.
94. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95. Leybaert, J., & Lechat, J. (2001). Phonological similarity effects in memory for serial order of cued speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 949-963.
96. Longoni, A. M., Richardson, J. T. E., & Aiello, A. (1993). Articulatory rehearsal and phonological storage in working memory. Memory & Cognition, 21, 11-22.
97. MacAndrew, D. K., Klatzky, R. L., Fiez, J. A., McClelland, J. L., & Becker, J. T. (2002). The phonological-similarity effect differentiates between two working memory tasks. Psychological Science, 13, 465-468.
98. MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35-54.
99. MacKay, D. G. (1970). Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia, 8, 323-350.
100. Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (1995). Functional characteristics of the inner voice and inner ear: Single or double agency? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 937-947.
101. Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (2003). Reification of phonological storage. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 1279-1288.
102. Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., Houghton, R. J., Nicholls, A. P., & Jones, D. M. (2003). Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 43-51.
103. Martín-Loeches, M., Schweinberger, S. R., & Sommer, W. (1997). The phonological loop model of working memory: An ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects. Memory & Cognition, 25, 471-483.
104. Martín-Loeches, M., & Sommer, W. (1998). Testing models of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory with event related potentials. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 206, 1-22.
105. Maybery, M., Parmentier, F. B., & Jones, D. M. (2002). Grouping of list items reflected in the timing of recall: Implications for models of serial verbal memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 360-385.
106. Miles, C., Jones, D. M., & Madden, C. A. (1991). Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 81, 111-121.
107. Morris, N., & Jones, D. M. (1990). Memory updating and working memory: The role of the central executive. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 111-121.
108. Morton, J. (1964). A preliminary functional model for language behaviour. International Audiology, 3, 215-225.
109. Morton, J., Crowder, R. G., & Prussin, H. A. (1971). Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 169-190.
110. Murray, A., & Jones, D. M. (2002). Articulatory complexity at item boundaries in serial recall: The case of Welsh and English digit span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 594-598.
111. Murray, D. J. (1968). Articulation and acoustic confusability in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 679-684.
112. Nairne, J. S. (1988). A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 16, 343-352.
113. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 251-269.
114. Nairne, J. S., & Kelly, M. R. (1999). Reversing the phonological similarity effect. Memory & Cognition, 27, 45-53.
115. Neath, I. (1999). Modelling the disruptive effects of irrelevant speech on order information. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 410-418.
116. Neath, I. (2000). Modelling the effect of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 403-423.
117. Neath, I., Surprenant, A., & Crowder, R. G. (1993). The context-dependent stimulus-suffix effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 698-703.
118. Neath, I., Surprenant, A., & LeCompte, D. (1998). Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect. Memory & Cognition, 26, 343-354.
119. Nicholls, A. P., & Jones, D. M. (2002a). Capturing the suffix: Cognitive streaming in immediate serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 12-28.
120. Nicholls, A. P., & Jones, D. M. (2002b). Perceptual organization in short-term memory: The sandwich effect reassessed. Memory & Cognition, 30, 81-88.
121. Nooteboom, S. G. (1969). The tongue slips into patterns. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence (pp. 338-392). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
122. Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall. Psychological Review, 105, 761-781.
123. Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D. (2003). The irrelevant sound effect: What needs modelling and a tentative model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1289-1300.
124. Parmentier, F. R., Maybery, M. T., & Jones, D. M. (in press). Temporal grouping in auditory spatial serial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
125. Parmentier, F. R., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (in press). The suffix effect in visuo-spatial serial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
126. Peterson, L. R., & Johnson, S. T. (1971). Some effects of minimizing articulation on short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 346-354.
127. Reisberg, D., Rappaport, I., & O'Shaughnessy, M. (1984). Limits to working memory-The digit digit-span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 203-221.
128. Richardson, J. T. E. (1984). Developing the theory of working memory. Memory & Cognition, 12, 71-83.
129. Ryan, J. (1969). Grouping and short-term memory: Different means and patterns of grouping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 21, 137-147.
130. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.
131. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Phonological factors in STM: Similarity and the unattended speech effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 263-265.
132. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). The effects of irrelevant speech on immediate free recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 540-542.
133. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1992). The role of word structure in segmental serial ordering. Cognition, 42, 213-259.
134. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Klatt, D. (1979). The limited use to distinctive features and markedness in speech production: Evidence from speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 41-55.
135. Smyth, M. M., & Scholey, K. A. (1996). Serial order in spatial immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 159-177.
136. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 731-802). New York: Academic Press.
137. Sternberg, S., Wright, C. E., Knoll, R. L., & Monsell, S. (1980). Motor programs in rapid speech: Additional evidence. In R. A. Cole (Ed.), The perception and production of fluent speech (pp. 803-848). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
138. Surprenant, A. M., LeCompte, D. C., & Neath, I. (2000). Manipulation of irrelevant information: Suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 325-348.
139. Surprenant, A. M., Neath, I., & LeCompte, D. C. (1999). Irrelevant speech, phonological similarity, and presentation modality. Memory, 7, 405-420.
140. Tolan, G. A., & Tehan, G. (2002). Testing feature interaction: Between-stream irrelevant speech effects in immediate recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 562-585.
141. Treiman, R. (1983). The structure of spoken syllables: Evidence from novel word games. Cognition, 15, 49-74.
142. Treiman, R., & Danis, C. (1988). Short-term memory errors for spoken syllables are affected by the linguistic structure of the syllables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 145-152.
143. Tremblay, S., & Couture, M. (2003, November). The Hebb repetition effect in spatial serial memory. Poster presented at the Psychonomic Society meeting, Vancouver, Canada.
144. Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (1998). Role of habituation in the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence from the effects of token set size and rate of transition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 659-671.
145. Tremblay, S., Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (2000). Elimination of the word length effect by irrelevant sound revisited. Memory & Cognition, 28, 841-846.
146. Tremblay, S., Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (2001). The impact of broadband noise on serial memory: Changes in band-pass frequency increase disruption. Memory, 9, 323-331.
147. Tremblay, S., Nicholls, A. P., Alford, D., & Jones, D. M. (2001). The irrelevant speech effect: Does speech play a special role? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1750-1754.
148. Tremblay, S., Parmentier, F., Nicholls, A. P., & Jones, D. M. (in press). A sandwich effect for serial spatial short-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
149. Warren, R. J. (1982). Auditory perception: A new synthesis. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
150. Wicklegren, W. A. (1965a). Acoustic similarity and retroactive interference in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 53-61.
151. Wicklegren, W. A. (1965b). Short-term memory for phonemically similar lists. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 576-574.
152. Wilshire, C. E. (1999). The 'tongue twister' paradigm as a technique for studying phonological encoding. Language and Speech, 42, 57-82.