The effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on the serial recall of silently presented lipread digits

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 593-616

  Divin, W ^a   Coyle, K ^b   James, D T T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; LIP READING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RECALL; SPEECH; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LIPREADING; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGE; SERIAL LEARNING; SPEECH; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035514257     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712601162365     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Baddeley, A. D., Papagno, C., & Morris, D. (1991). Phonological memory and serial order: A sandwich for TODAM. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (1998). Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 615-636.
5. Breeman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. London: MIT Press.
6. Bridges, A. M., & Jones, D. M. (1996). Word-dose in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 919-939.
7. Campbell, R., & Dodd, B. (1980). Hearing by eye. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 85-99.
8. Campbell, R., & Dodd, B. (1984). Aspects of hearing by eye. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bounhuis (Eds), Attention and performance X (pp. 300-311). Hove: Erlbaum.
9. Colle, H. A. (1980) Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 722-735.
10. Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 15, 17-32.
11. Darwin, C., & Baddeley, A. D. (1974). Acoustic memory and the perception of speech. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 41-60.
12. de Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J. (1994). Memory for consonants versus vowels in heard and lipread speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 737-756.
13. Dodd, B., & Campbell, R. (1984). Non-modality specific speech coding: The processing of lip-read information. Australian Journal of Psychology, 36, 171-179.
14. Frankish, C. (1996) Auditory short-term memory and the perception of speech. In S. E. Gathercole (Ed.), Models of short-term memory (pp. 179-207). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
15. Gathercole, S. E. (1986). The modality effect and articulation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 461-474.
16. Gathercole, S. E. (1987). Lip-reading: Implications for theories of short-term memory. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lipreading (pp. 315-319). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Gupta, P. & MacWhinney, B. (1995). Is the articulatory loop articulatory or auditory? Reexamining the effects of concurrent articulation on immediate serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 63-88.
18. Hanley, J. R. (1997). Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect? Memory, 5, 423-431.
19. Hanley, J. R., & Broadbent, C. (1987). The effect of irrelevant speech on serial recall following auditory presentation. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 287-297.
20. Jones, D. M. (1993). Objects, streams and threads of auditory attention. In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds), Attention: Selection awareness and control (pp. 87-104). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
21. Jones, D. M. (1994). Disruption of memory lip-read lists by irrelevant speech. Further support for the changing state hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 143-160.
22. Jones, D. M., Beaman, C. P., & Macken, W. J. (1996). The object-oriented episodic record model. In S. E. Gathercole (Ed.), Models of short-term memory (pp. 209-238). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
23. Jones D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1008-1018.
24. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1995). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect. Within-or between-stream similarity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21 103-115.
25. Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., & Murray, A. C. (1993). Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation. Memory and Cognition, 21, 318-328.
26. Jones, D. M., Madden, C. A., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short term memory: The role of changing state Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 645-669.
27. Jones, D. M., Miles, C., & Page, J. (1990). Disruption of proof-reading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 89-108.
28. Jones, D. M., & Morris, N. (1992). Irrelevant speech and serial recall: Implications for theories of attention and working memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 33, 212-229.
29. LeCompte, D. C. (1994). Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1396-1408.
30. LeCompte, D. C., Neely, C. B., & Wilson, J. R. (1997). Irrelevant speech and Irrelevant tones: The relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 472-483.
31. LeCompte, D. C., & Shaibe, D. M. (1997). On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Quarterly Journal of Experiment Psychology, 50A, 100-118.
32. Levy, B. A. (1971). Role of articulation in auditory and visual short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 10, 123-132.
33. MacDonald, J., & McGurk, H. (1978). Visual influence on speech perception processes. Perception and Psychophics, 24, 253-257.
34. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976) Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
35. Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (1995). Functional characteristics of the "inner voice" and the "inner ear": Single or double agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 436-448.
36. Martín-Loeches, M., & Sommer, W. (1998). Testing models of the irrelevant speech effect on working memory with event related potentials. Zeitschift für Psychologie, 206, 1-22.
37. Miles, C., Jones, D. M., & Madden, C. A. (1991). Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 578-584.
38. Neath, I., Surprenant, A. M., & Le Compte, D. (1998). Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect. Memory & Cognition, 26, 343-354.
39. Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory and Cognition, 17, 398-422.
40. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 21, 150-164.
41. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1986a). The unattended speech effect: Perception or memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 525-529.
42. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1986b). Phonological factors in STM: Similarity and the unattended speech effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 263-265.
43. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Effects of background music on phonologic short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 107-122.
44. Spoehr, K. T., & Corin, W. J. (1978). The stimulus suffix as a memory coding phenomenon. Memory and Cognition, 6, 583-589.
45. Summerfield, Q., MacLeod, A., McGrath, M., & Brooke, M. (1989). Lips, teeth and the benefits of lipreading. In A. W. Young & H. D. Ellis (Eds), Handbook of research on face processing (pp. 223-233). Amsterdam: Elsevier.