Testing feature interaction: Between-stream irrelevant speech effects in immediate recall

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 562-585

  Tolan, Georgina Anne ^a   Tehan, Gerald ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Irrelevant speech; Item interactions; Proactive interference; Short term memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036013086     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2820     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000)
2. Developments in the concept of working memory
3. The unattended speech effect: Perception or memory?
4. Role of serial order in the irrelevant speech effect: Tests of the changing-state hypothesis
5. Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall and serial recall
6. Word-dose in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant speech: Phonological confusions or changing-state?
7. Modeling item length effects in memory span: No rehearsal needed?
8. An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations: Analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall
9. Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location
10. Acoustic masking in primary memory
11. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists
12. The role of verbal output time in the effects of word length on immediate memory
13. Phonological similarity and trace degradation in the serial recall task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN
14. Objects, streams and threads of auditory attention
15. Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory
16. Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within- or between-stream similarity?
17. Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)
18. Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: Implications for models of short-term verbal memory
19. Simple and complex spans as measures of working memory capacity
20. On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect
21. The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: Positions of shared phonemes
22. Category name and instance norms for 106 categories of various sizes
23. Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory
24. Reversing the phonological similarity effect
25. Modelling the disruptive effects of irrelevant speech on order information
26. Modelling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory
27. Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory
28. Phonological factors in STM: Similarity and the unattended speech effect
29. Conceptual organization and class membership: Normative data for representations of 100 categories
30. A connectionist model of short-term recall
31. Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference
32. Cuing effects in short-term recall
33. Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: Building a DOG from a DART, a MOP, and a FIG
34. Determinants of short-term forgetting: Decay, retroactive interference or proactive interference?