Does Articulatory Suppression Remove the Irrelevant Speech Effect?

Memory

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 423-431

  Hanley, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER; HEARING; HUMAN; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH; VISION;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COMPUTERS; HUMANS; MEMORY; SPEECH; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031137223     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/741941394     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baddeley, A.D. (1992). Is working memory working? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 1-31.
2. Baddeley, A.D., & Hitch, G.J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.). The psychohology of learning and motivation, Vol. 8. New York: Academic Press.
3. Baddeley, A.D., & Salamé, P. (1986). The unattended speech effect: Perception or memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 12, 525-529.
4. Bridges, A.M., & Jones, D.M. (1996). Word dose in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant speech: Phonological confusions or changing state? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 919-939.
5. Colle, H.A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic making in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 17-32.
6. Conrad, R., & Hull, A.J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429-432.
7. Hanley, J.R., & Broadbent, C. (1987). The effects of unattended speech on serial recall following auditory presentation. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 287-297.
8. Jones, D.M. (1993). Objects, streams and threads of auditory attention. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.). Attention: Selection, awareness and control. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Jones, D.M. (1994). Disruption of memory for lip-read lists by irrelevant speech: Further support for the changing state hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47 A, 143-160.
10. Jones, D.M., & Macken. W.J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 19, 369-381.
11. Jones, D.M., & Macken, W.J. (1995). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within or between stream similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 21, 103-115.
12. Jones, D.M., Macken, W.J., & Murray, A.C. (1993). Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing state auditory stimuli. The role of segmentation. Memory and Cognition, 23, 318 -328.
13. Jones, D.M., Madden, C.A., & Miles. C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory. Quarterly journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 645-659.
14. Macken, W.J., & Jones, D.M. (1995). Functional characteristics of the inner voice and the inner ear: Single or double agency? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 21, 436-448.
15. Miles, C., Jones, D.M., & Madden, C.A. (1991). Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 17, 578-584.
16. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A.D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by irrelevant speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.
17. Salame, P., & Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Phonological factors in STM: Similarity and the unattended speech effect. Bulletin of the Psychnomic Society, 24, 263-265.