Irrelevant Speech, Phonological Similarity, and Presentation Modality

Memory

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 405-420

  Surprenant, Aimée M ^a   Neath, Ian ^b   LeCompte, Denny C ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000162152     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/741944920     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Baddeley, A.D. (1992). Is working memory working? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 1-31.
3. Colle, H.A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 17-32.
4. Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75-84.
5. Hanley, J.R., & Broadbent, C. (1987). The effect of unattended speech on serial recall following auditory presentation. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 287-297.
6. Jones, D.M. (1993). Objects, streams, and threads of auditory attention. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness, and control (pp. 87-104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Jones, D.M., & Macken, W.J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 369-381.
8. Jones, D.M., & Macken, W.J. (1995). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within-or between-stream similarity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 21, 103-115.
9. Jones, D.M., Macken, W.J., & Murray, A.C. (1993). Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation. Memory & Cognition, 21, 318-328.
10. Jones, D.M., Madden, C., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 645-669.
11. Macken, W.J., & Jones, D.M. (1995). Functional characteristics of the inner voice and the inner ear: Single or double agency? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 436-448.
12. Martín-Loeches, M., Schweinberger, S.R., & Sommer, W. (1997). The phonological loop model of working memory: An ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects. Memory & Cognition, 25, 471-483.
13. Murray, D.J. (1968). Articulation and acoustic confusability in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 679-684.
14. Nairne, J.S., & Kelley, M.R. (in press). Reversing the phonological similarity effect. Memory & Cognition.
15. Neath, I. (1997). Modality, concreteness, and set-size effects in a free reconstruction of order task. Memory & Cognition, 25, 256-263.
16. Neath, I., Surprenant, A.M., & LeCompte, D.C. (1998). Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect. Memory & Cognition, 26, 343-354.
17. Peterson, L.R., & Johnson, S.T. (1971). Some effects of minimizing articulation on short-term retention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 346-354.
18. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A.D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.
19. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Phonological factors in STM: Similarity and the unattended speech effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 263-265.
20. Surprenant, A.M., LeCompte, D.C., & Neath, I. (in press). Manipulations of irrelevant information: Suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology.
21. Watkins, M.J., & Sechler, E.S. (1989). Adapting to an irrelevant item in an immediate recall task. Memory & Cognition, 17, 682-692.