Can a single composite resin serve all purposes?

British Dental Journal

Volumn 199, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 73-79

  Roeters, J J M ^a   Shortall, A C C ^b   Opdam, N J M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PARTICLE SIZE; REVIEW; VISCOSITY;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); PARTICLE SIZE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 23144464863     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812520     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Lutz F. State of the art tooth-colored restoratives. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 237-248.
2. Wilson N H, Dunn S M, Gainsford I D. Current materials and techniques for direct restoration in posterior teeth. Part 2: Resin composite systems. Int Dent J 1997; 47: 185-193.
3. Hickel R J. Lecture at the congress 'Adhesive dentistry today! Transfer of research into practice'. Papendal: The Netherlands, 2002.
4. Dietschi D, Krejci I. Adhesive restorations in posterior teeth: Rationale for the application of direct techniques. Oper Dent 2001 Supplement 6: 191-197.
5. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 45-64.
6. Bogacki R E, Hunt R J, del Aguila M, Smith W R. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 488-492.
7. Opdam N, Bronkhurst E, Roeters J. Clinical survival of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice. J Dent Res 2004; 83: Special Issue A, abstr 0248.
8. Baratieri L N, Ritter A V. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13: 50-57.
9. Walls A W, Murray J J, McCabe J F. The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A clinical trial comparing a minimal composite restoration with an occlusal amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1988; 164: 288-292.
10. Blum I R, Schriever A, Heidemann D, Mjor I A, Wilson N H F. The repair of direct composite restorations: an international survey of the teaching of operative techniques and materials. Eur J Dent Educ 2003; 7: 41-48.
11. Elderton R J. Restorations without conventional cavity preparations. Int Dent J 1988; 38: 112-118.
12. Krejci I, Lieber C M, Lutz F. Time required to totally remove bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 34-40.
13. Millar B J, Robinson P B, Davies B R. Effects of the removal of composite resin restorations on Class II cavities. Br Dent J 1992; 173: 210-212.
14. Hunter A R, Treasure E A, Hunter A J. Increases in cavity volume associated with the removal of class II amalgam and composite restorations. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 2-6.
15. Gordan V V, Mondragon E, Shen C. Replacement of resin-based composite: Evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching. Quintess Int 2002; 32: 273-278.
16. Hansen E K, Asmussen E. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with enamel-bonded resin. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6: 218-225.
17. Homewood C I. Cracked tooth syndrome - Incidence, clinical findings and treatment. Aus Dent J 1998; 43: 217-222.
18. Fennis W M, Kuijs R H, Kreulen C M, Roeters F J, Creugers N H, Buregsdijk R C. A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 559-563.
19. Geurtsen W, Garcia-Godoy F. Bonded restorations for the prevention and treatment of the cracked-tooth syndrome. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 266-270.
20. Opdam N J M, Roeters F J M. The effectiveness of bonded composite restorations in the treatment of painful, cracked teeth: six-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2003a; 28: 327-333.
21. Wilson N H F. Conference report: Direct adhesive materials: current perceptions and evidence-future solutions. J of Dent 2001; 29: 307-316.
22. Schmidlin P, Hofer E, Lutz F. Evaluation of published clinical studies for reproducibility, comparability and adherence to evidence-based protocols. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 26-30.
23. Burke F J T, McHugh S, Hall A C, Randall R C, Widstrom E, Forss H. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice 2001. Br Dent J 2003; 194: 613-618.
24. Burke F J, Cheung S W, Mjor I A, Wilson N H F. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintess Int 1999; 30: 234-242.
25. Lutz F, Phillips R W. A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 480-488.
26. Bayne S C, Heymann H O, Swift E J Jr. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125: 1166-1168.
27. st century. Quintess Int 1993; 24: 641-658.
28. Ernst C-P, Brandenbusch K, Canbek K, Meyer G, Fiedler T, Gottschalk F, Willerhausen B. Clinical study on a Nanofiller versus a Hybrid resin composite. J Dent Res 2004; 83: Special Issue A abstr 1372.
29. 2 fillers. J Dent Res 2004; 83: Special Issue A abstr 3229.
30. Marquis P M, Curtis A R, Fleming G J P. Impact of pre-stressing on the strength of nanocluster composites. J Dent Res 2004; 83: Special Issue A abstr 3969.
31. Opdam N J M, Roeters J J M, Peters T C R B, Burgersdijk R C W, Kuys R. Consistency of resin composites for posterior use. Dent Mater 1996a; 12: 350-354.
32. Silikas N, Watts D C. Rheology of urethane dimethacrylate and diluent formulations. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 257-261.
33. Tyas M J, Jones D W, Rizkalla AS. The evaluation of resin composite consistency. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 424-428.
34. Ramusson C G, Lundin S A. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: five year results. Swed Dent J 1995; 19: 173-182.
35. Collins C J, Bryant K W, Hodge K L. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 1998; 26: 311-317.
36. Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quint Int 1998; 29: 483-490.
37. rd International Kuraray Symposium. pp 267-278. Cirimido, Italy: Grafiche Erredue, 2000.
38. Yamamoto M, Takahashi H. Tensile fatigue strength of light cure composite resins for posterior teeth. Dent Mater J 1995; 14: 175-184.
39. Lambrechts P, Ameye C, Vanherle G. Conventional and microfilled composite resins. Part II. Chip fractures. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 527-538.
40. Tyas M J. Correlation between fracture properties and clinical performance of composite resins in class IV cavities. Aus Dent J 1990; 35: 46-49.
41. Tyas M J. Colour stability of composite resins: a clinical comparison. Aus Dent J 1992; 37: 88-90.
42. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, Meyer J.M. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 353-362.
43. Shortall A C, Uctasli S, Marquis P M. Fracture resistance of anterior, posterior and universal light activated composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 87-96.
44. Condon J R, Ferracane J L. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 218-226.
45. Krämer N, Kunzelmann K H, Mumesohn M, Pelka M, Hickel R. Langzeiterfarhungen mit einem mikrogefüllten Komposit als Inlaysystem. Deutsch Zahn Zeitschr 1996; 51: 342-344.
46. Collins C J, Bryant R W, Hodge K- L V. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8 year findings. J Dent 1998; 26: 311-317.
47. Sabbagh J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Dynamic and static moduli of elasticity of resin-based materials. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 64-71.
48. Pelka M, Sindel J, Frankenberger R. Eigenschaften und Handling eines weissen und stopfbaren Füllstoffes. Zahnärtzliche Mitteilungen 1998; 88: 636-641.
49. Braun A R, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance and margin analysis of Ariston pHc versus Solitaire I as posterior restorations after 1 year. Clin Oral Invest 2001; 5: 139-147.
50. Hayashi M, Wilson N H F. Marginal deterioration as a predictor of failure of a posterior composite. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 155-62.
51. Ferracane J L. Condon J R. In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 262-267.
52. Cesar P F, Miranda W G Jr, Braga R R. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 289-296.
53. Yap A U J, Tan S H, Wee S S, Lee C W, Lim E L, Zeng K Y. Chemical degradation of composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 1015-1021.
54. Latta M A, Barkmeier W W, Triolo P T, Cavel W T, Blankenau R J. Three-year clinical evaluation of Z-100 in posterior restorations. J Dent Res 1998; 77: Special Issue A abstr 1046.
55. Suzuki M M, Stockton L W, Davidson D F. Four-year clinical evaluation of Zirconia Silica filled composite resin. J Dent Res 2004; 83: Special Issue A abstr 1373.
56. Kreulen C M, Amerongen van W E, Akerboom H B M, Borgmeijer P J. Two-year results with box-only resin composite restorations. J Dent Child 1995; 62: 395-400.
57. Lösche G M. Klasse-II-Kompositfüllungen mit und ohne konfectionierte Glaskeramik-Inserts. Deutsch Zahn Zeitschr 1996; 51: 389-394.
58. Bryant R W, Marzbani N, Hodge K L V. Occlusal margin defects around different types of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Oper dent 1992; 17: 215-221.
59. Bryant R W, Hodge K L. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations. Aust Dent J 1994; 39: 77-81.
60. Leinfelder K F, Radz G M, Nash R W. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 230-232.
61. Leinfelder K F. Posterior composite resins: the materials and their clinical performance. J Amer Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 663-676.
62. Raskin A, Michotte Theall B, Vreven J., Wilson N H F. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. J of Dent 1999; 27: 13-19.
63. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the ten year report. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 184-194.
64. Condon J R, Ferracane J L. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1405-1411.
65. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Katoh Y. Effect of an adhesive bonding system on wear resistance of resin composite restorations. Quint Int 1997; 28: 687-693.
66. Young H L, Suzuki S. Wear of composite resin inlays and antagonistic enamel. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 47-50.
67. Wendt S L, Leinfelder K F. Clinical evaluation of Clearfil PhotoPosterior: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 121-125.
68. Dijken van J W. Direct composite inlays/onlays: an eleven year follow-up. J Dent 2000; 28: 299-306.
69. Duke E S. Packable composites for posterior clinical applications. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000; 21: 604-605.
70. Suzuki M M. Recent commercial composite formulations. Oper Dent 2001; 6: 145-151.
71. Choi K K, Ferracane J L, Hilton T G, Charlton D. Properties of packable dental composites. J of Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 216-226.
72. Manhart J, Kunzelmann K-H, Chen H Y, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 33-40.
73. Cobb D S, Macgregor K M, Vargas M A, Denehy G E. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: A comparison. J Amer Dent Assoc 2000; 11: 1610-1615.
74. Kelsy W P, Latta M A, Shaddy R S, Stanislav C M. Physical properties of three packable resin-composite restorative materials. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 331-335.
75. Kyoung K C, Ferracane J L, Hilton T J, Charlton D. Properties of packable dental composites. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 216-226.
76. Peumans M, van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, Simon S, Abe Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts? Dent Mater 2001; 17: 533-541.
77. Manhart J, Che HY, Hickel R. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Amer Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 639-645.
78. Jorgensen K D, Hisamitsu H. Porosity in microfill restorative composites cured by visible light. Scand J Dent Res 1983; 91: 396-405.
79. Mentink A G B, Meeuwissen R, Hoppenbrouwers P P, Kayser A F, Mulder J. Porosity in resin composite core restorations: The effect of manipulative techniques Quint Int 1995; 26: 811-815.
80. Fano V, Ortalli I, Pozela K. Porosity in composite resins. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 1291-1295.
81. Opdam N J M, Roeters J J M, Peters T C R B, Burgersdijk R C W, Teunis M. Cavity wall adaptation and voids in adhesive class 1 composite resin restorations. Dent Mater 1996b; 12: 230-235.
82. Opdam N J M, Roeters J J M, Joosten M, Veeke O. Porosities and voids in class I restorations placed by six operators using a packable or syingable composite. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 58-63.
83. Huysmans M C D N J M, vd Varst P G T, Lautenschlager E P, Monaghan P. The influence of simulated clinical handling on the flexural and compressive strength of posterior composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 116-120.
84. Leevailoj C, Cochran M A, Matis B A, Moore B K, Platt J A. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 302-307.
85. Unterbrink G L, Liebenberg W H. Flowable resin composites as 'filled adhesives': literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintess Int 1999; 30: 249-257.
86. Chuang S F, Liu J K, Chao C C, Liao F P, Chen Y H. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 177-183.
87. Opdam N, Roeters J, de Boer T, Pesschier D, Bronkhorst E. Voids and porosities in class I micropreparations filled with various resin composites. Oper Dent 2003b; 28: 9-14.