Current materials and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth: Part 2: Resin composite systems

International Dental Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 185-193

  Wilson, N H F ^a   Dunne, S M ^a,b   Gainsford, I D ^a  

^a Kings Dental Institute ^*

^b Dental Institute   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

CHEMISTRY; DENTAL RESEARCH; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; REVIEW;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESEARCH; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; MOLAR;

EID: 0031196929     PISSN: 00206539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.1997.tb00448.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Dunne S M, Wilson N H F, Gainsford I D. Current materials and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth. Part I: Silver amalgam, Int Dent J 1997 47: 123-136.
2. Jones D W. The enigma of amalgam in dentistry. Canad Dent J 1993 59: 155-166.
3. Wilson E G, Mandradkieff M, Brindock T. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations. Dent Clin North Am 1990 34: 27-44.
4. Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G (Eds). State of the art on direct posterior filling materials and dentine bonding. Leuven: Van der Poorten, 1993.
5. Croll T P, Killian C M. Restoration of Class II carious lesions in primary molars using light-hardened glass ionomer-resin cement. Qunitess Int 1993 24: 561-565.
6. Sidhu, S K, Watson T F. Resin modified glass ionomer materials. Am J Dent 1995 8: 59-67.
7. Williams D F, Turner R M. Composite materials. In: Williams DC (ed). Concise encyclopaedia of medical and dental materials. pp 115-121, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990.
8. Watts D C. Dental restorative materials. In: Cahn R W, Haasen P and Kramer E J (eds). Materials science and technology: A comprehensive treatment. Volume 14, Dental and medical materials. Ed. Williams D F, Weinheim, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (Chapter 6), 1991.
9. Mjør I A. Direct posterior filling materials. In: Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G (eds). State of the art on direct posterior filling materials and dentine bonding, pp1-13, Leuven: Van der Poorten, 1993.
10. Ferracane J L. Dental composites: Present status and research directions. In: Okabe T, Takahashi S (eds). Trans. Second International Congress on Dental Materials. pp43-53, The Academy of Dental Materials/Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices, 1993
11. Smith D C. General discussion. In: Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G (eds). State of the art on direct posterior filling materials and dentine bonding, pp 251-269, Leuven: Van der Poorten, 1993
12. El-Mowafy O M, Lewis D W, Benmergui C, Levinton C. Metaanalysis of long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. J Dent 1994 22: 33-43.
13. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Classification of composites. In: Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G (Eds). State of the art on direct posterior filling materials and dentine bonding. pp77-105, Leuven: Van der Poorten, 1993.
14. McLean J W. The failed restoration: Causes of failure and how to prevent them. Int Dent J 1990 40: 354-358.
15. Jensen M E, Chan D C N. Polymerisation shrinkage and microleakage. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). Posterior composite resin restorative materials. pp 243-262, Utrecht: Peter Szulc Publishing Co., 1985.
16. Soderholm K J M. Leaking of fillers in dental composites. J Dent Res 1983 62: 126-130.
17. Ruyter I E. Monomer systems and polymerisation. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). Posterior composite resin restorative materials. pp 109-135, Utrecht: Peter Szulc Publishing Co., 1985.
18. Roulet J F. Degradation of dental polymers. Basel: Kager, 1987.
19. Larsen I B, Munksgaard E C. Effect of human saliva on surface degradation of composite resins. Scand J Dent Res 1991 99: 254-261.
20. Svanberg M, Mjor I A, Orstavik D. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite and glass ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1990 69: 861-884.
21. Hensten-Pettersen A, Jacobsen N. Toxic effects of dental materials. Int Dent J 1991 41: 265-273.
22. Mjør I A. Potential biological consequences of alternatives to dental amalgam. In: Bergman B, Bostrom H, Larsson K S, Loe H (eds). Potential biological consequences of mercury released from dental amalgam. pp 93-113, Stockholm: Swedish Medical Research Council, 1992.
23. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg T R. Elimination of polymerisation stresses at the margins of posterior composite restorations: A new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986 17: 777-784.
24. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. The importance of proximal curing in posterior resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1992 23: 605-609.
25. Munksgaard E C. Bivirkninger fra dentalmaterialer. pp 4-80, Copenhagen: Dansk tandlaegeforening, 1989
26. Lutz F, Krejci I. Reaction paper: Direct posterior filling materials. In: Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G (eds).State of the art on direct posterior filling materials and dentine bonding. pp 15-28, Leuven: Van der Poorten, 1993.
27. Burke F J T, McCaughey A D. The four generations of dentine bonding. Am J Dent 1995 8: 88-92.
28. Tonn E M, Ryge G. Clinical evaluations of composite resin restorations in primary molars: a 4-year follow-up study. J Am Dent Assoc 1988 117: 603-606.
29. Oliveira F de C Jr, Covey A, Denehy G E. Conservative posterior composite resin preparations. Campend Contin Educ Dent 1986 7: 327-332.
30. Hunt P R. A modified Class II cavity preparation for glass ionomer restorative materials. Quintessence Int 1984 25: 1011-1015.
31. Knight G M. The use of adhesive materials in the conservative restoration of selected posterior teeth. Aust Dent J 1984 229: 324-331.
32. Simonsen R J, Stallard R E. Sealant restorations utilising a diluted filled composite resin: One year results. Quintessence Int 1977 6: 77-84.
33. Simonsen R J. Preventive resin restorations I. Quintessence Int 1978 9: 69-76.
34. Radaal M. Follow-up study of sealing and filling with composite resins in the prevention of occlusal caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1977 6: 176-180.
35. Simonsen R J. Preventive resin restorations: three year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1980 100: 535-539.
36. Simon R J, Landy N A. Preventive resin restorations. Fracture resistance and 7 year clinical results. J Dent Res 1984 63: 175.
37. Walker J D, Jensen M E, Pinkham J R. A clinical review of preventive resin restorations. J Dent Child 1990 57: 257-259.
38. Haupt M, Fuks A, Eidelmann E. The preventive resin (composite resin/sealant) restoration: Nine year results. Quintessence Int 1994 25: 155-159.
39. Ripa L W, Wolff M S. Preventive resin restorations: indications, technique and success. Quintessence Int 92 23: 307-315.
40. Lumley P J, Fisher F J. Tunnel restorations: a long-term pilot study over a minimum of five years. J Dent 1995 23: 213-215.
41. Welbury R R, Walls A W G, Murray J J, McCabe J F. The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A 5-year clinical trial comparing a minimal composite with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1990 169: 361-366.
42. Granath L, Schroder U, Sundin B. Clinical evaluation of preventive and Class I composite resin restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1992 50: 359-364.
43. Douglas W H. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC. (eds.) Posterior resin dental restorative materials. pp 433-441, Utrecht: Peter Szulc Publishing Co, 1995.
44. Burke F J T. Tooth fracture in vivo and in vitro. A review. J Dent 1992 20: 131-139.
45. Bayne S C, Heymann H O, Sturdevant J R, Wilder A D, Sluder T B. Contributing co-variables in clinical trials. Am Dent J 1991 4: 247-250.
46. Whitehead S A, Wilson N H F. Restorative decision-making behaviour with magnification. Quintessence Int 1992 23: 667-671.
47. Taylor D F, Bayne S C, Leinfelder K F. Pooling of long-term clinical wear data for posterior composites J Dent Res 1992 712: 112.
48. Mjør I A, Jokstad A, Qvist V. Longevity of posterior restorations. Int Dent J 1990 40: 11-17.
49. Effects and side effects of dental restorative materials: An NIH technology assessment conference. Advances in Dental Research 1992 6: 1-114.
50. Bergman B, Bostrom H, Larsson K S, Loe H (eds). Potential biological consequences of mercury released from dental amalgam. Proceedings from a state of the art conference, Stockholm. pp 1-200, Stockholm: Swedish Medical Research Council, 1992.
51. Public Health Service. Dental amalgam: a scientific review and recommended public health service strategy for research, education and regulation. pp1-27 (with eight appendices), Washington: Department of Health and Human Services, 1993.
52. FDI/WHO. Consensus statement on dental amalgam. FDI World 1995 July/August: 9-10.
53. Qvist V. Resin restorations: leakage, bacteria and pulp. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993 9: 127-152.
54. Elderton R J. The quality of amalgam restorations. In: Allred H (Ed). Assessment of the quality of dental care. pp 45-48, London: London Hospital Medical College, 1977.
55. Wilson N H F, Setcos J C. The teaching of posterior composites. A world-wide survey. J Dent (Special Issue) 1989 17: S29-S33.
56. Wilson, N H F. Reaction paper: Classification of composites. In: Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G (eds). State of the art on direct posterior filling materials and dentine bonding. pp 107-111, Leuven: Van der Poorten, 1993.