Substrate discrimination by cholapod anion receptors: Geometric effects and the "affinity-selectivity principle"

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 127, Issue 30, 2005, Pages 10739-10746

  Clare, John P ^a   Ayling, Alan J ^a   Joos, Jean Baptiste ^a   Sisson, Adam L ^a   Magro, Germinal ^a   Pérez Payán, M Nieves ^b   Lambert, Timothy N ^c   Shukla, Rameshwer ^c   Smith, Bradley D ^c   Davis, Anthony P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; CELLS; FREE ENERGY; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEN BONDS; SOLVENTS; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION); SUBSTRATES; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY;

CHOLAPOD ANION RECEPTORS; NONPOLAR MEDIA; SUBSTRATE DISCRIMINATION; VESICLE MEMBRANES;

NEGATIVE IONS;

ANION; CHLOROFORM; CHOLAPOD ANION RECEPTOR; RECEPTOR; SOLVENT; TETRYLAMMONIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANION TRANSPORT; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ENERGY; EXTRACTION; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEN BOND; RECEPTOR AFFINITY; SENSOR; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY; SYNTHESIS;

ANIONS; CYCLOHEXANES; HYDROGEN BONDING; KINETICS; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; ORGANIC ANION TRANSPORTERS; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 23044438586     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0524144     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. (a) Bianchi, A.; Bowman-James, K.; Garcia-España, E. Supramolecular Chemistry of Anions; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1997.
2. (b) Schmidtchen, F. P.; Berger, M. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1609.
3. (c) Beer, P. D.; Gale, P. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 487.
4. (d) Gale, P. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 1.
5. (e) Gale, P. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 191.
6. A few biologically active natural products show anion recognition properties, examples being the vancomycin group of antibiotics (carboxylate recognition: see Williams, D. H.; Bardsley, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1173),
7. the prodigiosins (HCl transporters: see Furstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3582),
8. and the pamamycins (anionophores: see Jeong, E. J.; Kang, E. J.; Sung, L. T.; Hong, S. K.; Lee, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14655). However, cation recognition is far better established as a mode of biological activity.
9. Suksai, C.; Tuntulani, T. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 192.
10. Martinez-Manez, R.; Sancenon, F. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4419.
11. Wiskur, S. L.; Ait-Haddou, H.; Lavigne, J. J.; Anslyn, E. V. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 963.
12. Fundamentals and Applications of Anion Separations; Moyer, B. A., Singh, R. P., Eds.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, 2004.
13. Roundhill, D. M.; Koch, H. F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 60.
14. Levitskaia, T. G.; Marquez, M.; Sessler, J. L.; Shriver, J. A.; Vercouter, T.; Moyer, B. A. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2248.
15. Kavallieratos, K.; Sachleben, R. A.; Van Berkel, G. J.; Moyer, B. A. Chem. Commun. 2000, 187.
16. Llinares, J. M.; Powell, D.; Bowman-James, K. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 57.
17. (a) Sessler, J. L.; Camiolo, S.; Gale, P. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 17.
18. (b) Choi, K. H.; Hamilton, A. D. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 101.
19. (c) Bondy, C. R.; Loeb, S. J. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 77.
20. (d) Antonisse, M. M. G.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Chem. Commun. 1998, 443.
21. (e) Wedge, T. J.; Hawthorne, M. F. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 111.
22. Buhlmann, P.; Pretsch, E.; Bakker, E. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1593.
23. Dobler, M. Molecular recognition: receptors for cationic guests. In Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol. 1; Gokel, G. W., Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1996; p 267.
24. An important exception is the pyrrole unit, as exploited by Sessler in the calixpyrroles (see ref 6a).
25. (a) Davis, A. P.; Perry, J. J.; Williams, R. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1793.
26. (b) Ayling, A. J.; Pérez-Payán, M. N.; Davis, A. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12716.
27. (c) Ayling, A. J.; Broderick, S.; Clare, J. P.; Davis, A. P.; Pérez-Payán, M. N.; Lahtinen, M.; Nissinen, M. J.; Rissanen, K. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 2197.
28. (d) Davis, A. P.; Joos, J.-B. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 143.
29. -1 was measured for unpaired chloride ions in 1,2-dichloroethane using a voltammetric method. See: Dryfe, R. A. W.; Hill, S. S.; Davis, A. P.; Joos, J.-B.; Roberts, E. P. L.; Fisher, A. C. Org. Biomol. Cheat. 2004, 2, 2716.
30. Koulov, A. V.; Lambert, T. N.; Shukla, R.; Jain, M.; Boon, J. M.; Smith, B. D.; Li, H. Y.; Sheppard, D. N.; Joos, J. B.; Clare, J. P.; Davis, A. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4931.
31. McNally, B. A.; Koulov, A. V.; Smith, B. D.; Joos, J.-B.; Davis, A. P. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1087.
32. Dutzler, R.; Campbell, E. B.; Cadene, M.; Chait, B. T.; MacKinnon, R. Nature 2002, 415, 287.
33. Koulov, A. V.; Mahoney, J. M.; Smith, B. D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 27.
34. Chrisstoffels, L. A. J.; de Jong, F.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1376.
35. Chrisstoffels, L. A. J.; de Jong, F.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Sivelli, S.; Gazzola, L.; Casnati, A.; Ungaro, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10142.
36. (a) Sessler, J. L.; Allen, W. E. Chemtech 1999, 29, 16.
37. (b) Janout, V.; Jing, B. W.; Staina, I. V.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4436.
38. (c) Merritt, M.; Lanier, M.; Deng, G.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8494.
39. (d) Sakai, N.; Matile, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2613.
40. (e) Sakai, N.; Sorde, N.; Das, G.; Perrottet, P.; Gerard, D.; Matile, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 1226.
41. (f) Dietrich, B.; Fyles, T. M.; Hosseini, M. W.; Lehn, J.-M.; Kaye, K. C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1988, 691.
42. Sidorov, V.; Kotch, F. W.; Abdrakhmanova, G.; Mizani, R.; Fettinger, J. C.; Davis, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2267.
43. Sidorov, V.; Kotch, F. W.; Kuebler, J. L.; Lam, Y. F.; Davis, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2840.
44. Schlesinger, P. H.; Ferdani, R.; Liu, J.; Pajewska, J.; Pajewski, R.; Saito, M.; Shabany, H.; Gokel, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1848.
45. Schlesinger, P. H.; Ferdani, R.; Pajewski, R.; Pajewska, J.; Gokel, G. W. Chem. Commun. 2002, 840.
46. Schlesinger, P. H.; Djedovic, N. K.; Ferdani, R.; Pajewska, J.; Pajewski, R.; Gokel, G. W. Chem. Commun. 2003, 308.
47. Djedovic, N.; Ferdani, R.; Harder, E.; Pajewska, J.; Pajewski, R.; Schlesinger, P. H.; Gokel, G. W. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2862.
48. Welsh, M. J.; Ramsey, B. W.; Accurso, F.; Cutting, G. R. In The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease; Scriver, C. R., Beaudet, A. L., Sly, W. S., Valle, D., Eds.; McGraw-Hill Inc.: New York, 2001; p 5121.
49. Lambert, T. N.; Boon, J. M.; Smith, B. D.; Pérez-Payán, M. N.; Davis, A. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5276.
50. Boon, J. M.; Lambert, T. N.; Sisson, A. L.; Davis, A. P.; Smith, B. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8195.
51. Smith, B. D.; Lambert, T. N. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2261.
52. Hay, B. P.; Dixon, D. A.; Bryan, J. C.; Moyer, B. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 182.
53. Hay, B. P.; Gutowski, M.; Dixon, D. A.; Garza, J.; Vargas, R.; Moyer, B. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7925.
54. Hay, B. P.; Firman, T. K.; Moyer, B. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1810.
55. Siracusa, L.; Hurley, F. M.; Dresen, S.; Lawless, L. J.; Pérez-Payán, M. N.; Davis, A. P. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4639.
56. Kavallieratos, K.; deGala, S. R.; Austin, D. J.; Crabtree, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2325.
57. Kavallieratos, K.; Bertao, C. M.; Crabtree, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1675.
58. Direct comparisons between methyl and eicosyl esters have been made in several cases, revealing no substantial differences.
59. del Amo, V.; Siracusa, L.; Markidis, T.; Baragana, B.; Bhattarai, K. M.; Galobardes, M.; Naredo, G.; Pérez-Payán, M. N.; Davis, A. P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3320.
60. Kyba, E. P.; Helgeson, R. C.; Madan, K.; Gokel, G. W.; Tarnowski, T. L.; Moore, S. S.; Cram, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 2564.
61. Timko, J. M.; Moore, S. S.; Walba, D. M.; Hiberty, P. C.; Cram, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4207.
62. Fielding, L. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6151.
63. Alper, J. S.; Gelb, R. I.; Laufer, D. A.; Schwartz, L. M. Anal. Chim. Acta 1989, 220, 171.
64. Whitlock, B. J.; Whitlock, H. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3910.
65. Jansen, R. J.; de Gelder, R.; Rowan, A. E.; Scheeren, H. W.; Nolle, R. J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2643.
66. Boss, R. D.; Popov, A. I. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 3660.
67. Wang, Z. X. FEBS Lett. 1995, 360, 111.
68. See also: Wilcox, C. S.; Adrian, J. C., Jr.; Webb, T. H.; Zawacki, F. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10189.
69. De Jong, F.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Smit, C. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 1375.
70. De Boer, J. A. A.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 5347.
71. Cram, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 1039.
72. Anzenbacher, P.; Try, A. C.; Miyaji, H.; Jursikova, K.; Lynch, V. M.; Marquez, M.; Sessler, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10268.
73. For a related theoretical study, see: Bias, J. R.; Marquez, M.; Sessler, J. L.; Luque, F. J.; Orozco, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12796.
74. (a) Abraham, M. H.; Platts, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3484.
75. (b) Hunter, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5310.
76. Values for receptor 12 are offset from these plots, possibly due to geometric and/or chemical differences between ureas and thioureas.
77. H), and vice versa.
78. Humer, C. A.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5525.
79. This conclusion is supported by modeling (Macromodel 7.1, MMFFs force field, chloroform solvation). Acetate is found to make four H-bonds of roughly equal length to 5, without causing obvious distortion.