Power, voice, and hierarchy: Exploring the antecedents of speaking up in groups

Group Dynamics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 93-103

  Islam, Gazi ^a,b   Zyphur, Michael J ^a,c  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Tulane University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LEADERSHIP; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL STATUS; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEAMWORK; VOICE;

EID: 22244456034     PISSN: 10892699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1089-2699.9.2.93     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.
3. Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1992). Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Personnel Psychology, 45, 141-164.
4. Bedeian, A. G. (2002). The dean's disease: How the darker side of power manifests itself in the office of dean. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 164-174.
5. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Coats, E. J., & Feldman, R. S. (1996). Gender differences in nonverbal correlates of social status. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1014-1022.
7. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 247-265.
9. Cotton, J. L., Vollrath, D. A., Froggatt, K. L., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Jennings, K. R. (1988). Employee participation: Diverse forms and different outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 13, 8-22.
10. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizabiliry for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
11. Dachler, H. P., & Wilpert, B. (1978). Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: A critical evaluation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 1-39.
12. Dyck, B., & Starke, F. A. (1999). The formation of breakaway organizations: Observations and a process model. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 792-822.
13. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
14. Goodwin, S. A., Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (1998). Situational power and interpersonal dominance facilitate bias and inequality. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 677-698.
15. Hecht, M., & LaFrance, M. (1998). License or obligation to smile: The effect of power and sex on amount and type of smiling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1332-1342.
16. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623-641.
18. Janis, L. L. (1972). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2000). Power, approach and inhibition (Rep. No. 1669). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
20. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339-348.
21. Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Levi, S., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126-137.
22. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1991). On becoming a CEO: The transference and the addictiveness of power. In M. F. R. Kets de Vries (Ed.), Organizations on the couch: Clinical perspectives on organizational behavior and change (pp. 120-139). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Kipnis, D. (1976). The powerholders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Kipnis, D. (1984). The view from the top. Psychology Today, 18, 30-36.
25. Kizilos, M. A. C., Thomas, G., & Strickstein, A. (1994). Achieving superior customer service through employee involvement: An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 197-205.
26. Kramer, R. M. (1998). Revisiting the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam decisions 25 years later: How well has the groupthink hypothesis stood the test of time? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 236-271.
27. LeBreton, J. M., Burgess, J. R. D., Kaiser, R. B., Atchley, E. K., & James, L. R. (2003). The restriction of variance hypothesis and interrater reliability and agreement: Are ratings from multiple sources really dissimilar? Organizational Research Methods, 6, 80-128.
28. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853-868.
29. Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). Ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 13, 572-587.
30. Locke, E. A., & Schweiger, D. M. (1979). Participation in decision making: One more look. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
31. Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. N., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
32. Milgram, S. (1983). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: HarperCollins.
33. Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., Kemery, E. R., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1998). Relationships between bases of power and work reactions: The mediational role of procedural justice. Journal of Management, 24, 533-552.
34. Nezlek, J. B., & Zyzniewski, L. E. (1998). Using hierarchical linear modeling to analyze grouped data. Group Dynamics, 2, 313-320.
35. Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. (2002). The role of employee loyalty and formality in voicing discontent. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1167-1174.
36. Pollack, B. N. (1998). Hierarchical linear modeling and the "unit of analysis" problem: A solution for analyzing responses of intact group members. Group Dynamics, 2, 299-312.
37. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
38. Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A. G., III. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 599-627.
39. Sadler, M. S., & Judd, C. M. (2001). Overcoming dependent data: A guide to the analysis of group data. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 497-524). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
40. Salancik, G., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). Who gets power-and how they hold on to it: A strategic contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics, 5, 2-21.
41. Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., & Rowley, G. L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 922-932.
42. Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. M. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
43. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Staw, B. M., & Boettger, R. D. (1990). Task revision: A neglected form of work performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 534-559.
45. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501-524.
46. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
47. Tiedens, L. Z., Ellsworth, P. C., & Mesquita, B. (2000). Stereotypes about sentiments and status: Emotional expectations for high- and low-status group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 560-573.
48. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108-119.
49. Wagner, J. A. I. (1994). Participation's effects on performance and satisfaction: A reconsideration of research evidence. Academy of Management Review, 19, 312-331.
50. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In R. Hogan & J. A. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 767-793). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
51. Withey, M. J., & Cooper, W. H. (1989). Predicting exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 521-539.
52. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682-697.