Evidence for an automatic orthographic code in the processing of visually novel word forms

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 273-317

  Johnston, Michael ^a   McKague, Meredith ^b   Pratt, Chris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LINGUISTICS; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; VERBAL MEMORY; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MASKING; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 1942467848     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960344000189     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Berent, I. (1997). Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: Regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1727-1742.
2. Bodner, G.E., & Masson, M.E.J. (1997). Masked repetition priming and nonwords: Evidence for a non-lexical basis for priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 268-293.
3. Bowers, J.S. (2000). In defence of abstractionist theories of word identification and repetition priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 83-99.
4. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J.T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
5. Davis, C., Castles, A., & Iakovidis, E. (1998). Masked homophone and pseudohomophone priming in adults and children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 625-651.
6. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353-372.
7. Folk, J., Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2002). The interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: What's the point? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 653-671.
8. Forster, K. & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenutation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory and cognition, 10, 680-698.
9. Forster, K., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
10. Forster, K.I. (1985). Lexical acquisition and the modular lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 87-108.
11. Forster, K.I. (1992). Memory-addressing mechanisms and lexical access. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 413-434). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Forster, K.I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203-233.
13. Forster, K.I., & Chambers, S.M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
14. Forster, K.I., & Veres, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 498-314.
15. Forster, K.I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In Kinoshita, S., & Lupker, S.J. (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art. New York: Psychology Press.
16. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
17. Goodman, R.A., & Caramazza, A. (1986). Phonologically plausible errors: Implications for a model of the phoneme-grapheme conversion mechanism in the spelling process. In G. Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography (pp. 300-324). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
18. Grainger, J. & Ferrand, (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218-233.
19. Grainger, J., Spinelli, E., & Ferrand, L. (2000). Effects of baseword frequency and orthographic neighborhood size in pseudohomophone naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 88-102.
20. Jiang, N. & Forster, K.I. (2001). Cross-language priming asymmetries in lexical decision and episodic recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 32-51.
21. Johnston, M.B. & Castles, A.E. (2003). Dissociating automatic orthographic and phonological codes in lexical access and lexical acquisition. In Kinoshita, S., & Lupker, S.J. (Eds.), Masked priming. The state of the art. New York: Psychology Press.
22. Kucera, J., & Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
23. Laxon, V., Smith, B., & Masterson, J. (1995). Children's nonword reading: Pseudohomophones, neighbourhood size and priming effects. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 126-144.
24. Lukatela, G., Frost, S., & Turvey, M. (1998). Phonological priming by masked nonword primes in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 666-683.
25. Marmurek, H.H.C., & Kwantes, F.J. (1996). Reading words and wirds: Phonology and lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 696-714.
26. McCann, R.S., & Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 14-24.
27. McKague, M., Pratt, C., & Johnston, M.B. (2001). The effect of oral vocabulary on reading visually novel words: A comparison of the dual-route-cascaded and triangle frameworks. Cognition, 80, 231-262.
28. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
29. Paap, K.R., McDonald, J.E., Schvaneveldt, R.W., & Noel, R.W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.). Attention and performance: Vol. XII. The psychology of reading (pp. 221-243). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
30. Pring, L. & Snowling, M. (1986). Developmental changes in word recognition: An information processing account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 395-418.
31. Rajaram, S., & Neely, J.H. (1992). Dissociative masked repetition priming and word frequency effects in lexical decision and episodic recognition tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 152-182.
32. Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S.S., & Rubenstein, M.A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 10, 645-657.
33. Salasoo, A., Shiffrin, R.M., & Feustel, T.C. (1985). Building permanent memory codes: Codification and repetition effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 50-77.
34. Taft, M., & Russell, B. (1992). Pseudohomophone naming and the word frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 51-71.
35. Tenpenny, P.L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 2, 339-363.