Phonological Priming by Masked Nonword Primes in the Lexical Decision Task

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 666-683

  Lukatela, Georgije ^a   Frost, Stephen J ^a   Turvey, M T ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001473168     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2599     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bosman A. M. T., de Groot A. M. B. Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading: Evidence from beginning readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. 49:1996;715-744.
2. Berent I. Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: Regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23:1997;1727-1742.
3. Berent I., Perfetti C. A ROSE is a REEZ: The two-cycle model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review. 102:1995;146-184.
4. Carello C., Turvey M. T., Lukatela G. Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological? Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. 1992;North-Holland, Amsterdam. p. 211-226.
5. Coltheart M. Lexical access in simple reading tasks. Underwood G. Strategies of information processing. 1978;151-216 Academic Press, London.
6. Coltheart M., Coltheart V. Reading comprehension is not exclusively reliant upon phonological representation. Cognitive Neuroscience. 14:1997;167-176.
7. Coltheart M., Rastle K. Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:1994;1197-1211.
8. Coltheart M., Curtis B., Atkins P., Haller M. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review. 100:1993;589-608.
9. Ferrand L., Grainger J. Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. 42:1992;353-372.
10. Ferrand L., Grainger J. The time-course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 31:1993;119-122.
11. Ferrand L., Grainger J. Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. 47:1994;365-382.
12. Forster K. Form priming by masked primes: The best-match hypothesis. Coltheart M. Attention and performance XII. 1987;127-146 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
13. Forster K., Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 10:1984;680-698.
14. Forster K., Davis C. The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;1-25.
15. Forster K., Veres C. The prime lexicality effect: Form priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 24:1998;498-514.
16. Forster K., Davis C., Schoknecht C., Carter R. Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition of partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 39:1987;211-251.
17. Frost R. Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin. 123:1998;71-99.
18. Glushko R. J. The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 5:1979;674-691.
19. Grainger J., Ferrand L. Phonology and Orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language. 33:1994;218-233.
20. Grainger J., Ferrand L. Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-talk comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language. 35:1996;623-647.
21. Hanley J. R., McDonnell V. Are reading and spelling phonologically mediated? Evidence from a patient with a speech production impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 14:1997;3-33.
22. Humphreys G. W., Evett L. J. Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of dual-route theory of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 8:1985;689-739.
23. Humphreys G. W., Besner D., Quinlan P. T. Event perception and the word repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 117:1988;51-67.
24. Humphreys G. W., Evett L. J., Taylor D. E. Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition. 10:1982;576-590.
25. Humphreys G. W., Evett L. J., Quinlan P. T., Besner D. Orthographic priming: Qualitative differences between priming from identified and unidentified primes. Coltheart M. Attention and performance XII. 1987;105-125 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
26. Kucera J., Francis W. N. Computational analysis of present day American English. 1967;Brown University Press, Providence.
27. Kay J., Bishop D. Anatomical differences between nose, palm, and foot, or, the body in question: Further dissection of the processes of sub-lexical spelling-sound translation. Coltheart M. Attention and performance XII. 1987;449-469 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
28. Liberman A. M. The relation of speech to reading and writing. de Gelder B., Morais J. Speech and Reading. 1995;17-32 Erlbaum (UK) Taylor and Francis, Hove.
29. Lukatela G., Turvey M. T. Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology. Memory & Cognition. 18:1990;128-152.
30. Lukatela G., Turvey M. T. Similar attentional, frequency and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 19:1993;166-178.
31. Lukatela G., Turvey M. T. Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 123:1994a;107-128.
32. Lukatela G., Turvey M. T. Visual lexical access is initially phonological. 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 123:1994b;331-353.
33. Lukatela, G. Turvey, M. T. Do spelling variations affect associative and phonological priming by pseudohomophones?
34. Lukatela, G. Carello, C. Savic, M. Urosevic, Z. Turvey, M. T. When nonwords activate semantics better than words, Cognition.
35. Lukatela, G. Frost, S. J. Turvey, M. T. Identity priming in English is compromised by phonological ambiguity, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
36. Lukatela G., Lukatela K., Turvey M. T. Further evidence for phonological constraints on lexical access: TOWED primes FROG. Perception & Psychophysics. 53:1993;461-466.
37. Lukatela G., Savić M., Uro s Z., Turvey M. T. Phonological ambiguity impairs identity priming in naming and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language. 36:1997;360-381.
38. Michaels C. F., Turvey M. T. Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance. Psychological Research. 41:1979;1-61.
39. McCann R. S., Besner D. Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation and the locus of frequency effects in word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 13:1987;14-24.
40. Patterson K., Morton J. From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. Patterson K., Marshall J. C., Coltheart M. Surface dyslexia. 1985;Erlbaum, London.
41. Perfetti C. A., Bell L. Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;473-485.
42. Plaut D. C., McClelland J. L., Seidenberg M. S., Patterson K. E. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review. 103:1996;56-115.
43. Rayner K., Sereno S. C., Lesch M. F., Pollatsek A. Phonological codes are automatically activated during reading: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. Psychological Science. 6:1995;26-32.
44. Seidenberg M. S., McClelland J. L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review. 96:1989;523-568.
45. Stone G. O., Vanhoy M., Van Orden G. C. Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. 36:1997;337-359.
46. Treiman R., Chafetz J. Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words? Coltheart M. Attention and performance XII. 1987;281-298 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
47. Treiman R., Mullenix J., Bijeljac-Babic R., Richmond-Welty E. D. The special role of rimes in the description, use, and the acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 124:1995;107-136.
48. Ulrich R., Miller J. Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 123:1994;34-80.
49. Van Orden G. C. Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading. Besner D., Humphreys G. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. 1991;77-103 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
50. Van Orden G. C., Goldinger S. D. Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:1994;1269-1291.
51. Van Orden G. C., Pennington B. F., Stone G. O. Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review. 97:1990;488-522.