Deciphering the timescales and mechanisms of protein folding using minimal off-lattice models

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 197-207

  Thirumalai, D ^a   Klimov, D K ^a  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYPEPTIDE; PROTEIN; RNA;

KINETICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; REVIEW; SIMULATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0033117927     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80028-1     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Dill KA, Bromberg S, Yue K, Fiebig KM, Yee DP, Thomas PD, Chan HS: Principles of protein folding - A perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci 1995, 4:561-602.
2. Dill KA, Chan HS: From levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat Struct Biol 1997, 4:10-19. An excellent review of theoretical studies of protein folding. The statistical mechanical perspective of folding is summarized and the authors present a simple description of the expected scenarios for the kinetics of folding. Comparisons with experimental results make this a handy review.
3. Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG: Funnels, pathways and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis. Protein 1995, 21:167-195.
4. Pande VS, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T, Rokhsar DS: Pathways for protein folding: Is a new view needed? Curr Opin Struct Biol 1998, 8:68-79. This review analyzes the lessons learned from the simulation of simple lattice models of proteins, with emphasis on design techniques, energy landscapes and transition-state characterization. The authors discuss different views on transition state classes derived using a suitable reaction coordinate for protein folding. An attempt is made to reconcile the classical (hierarchical) view of the folding reaction with the view point suggested by the statistical mechanical approach.
5. Thirumalai D, Woodson S: Kinetics of folding of proteins and RNA. Accounts Chem Res 1996, 29:433-439.
6. Karplus M, Sali A: Theoretical studies of protein folding and unfolding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995, 5:58-73.
7. Thirumalai D, Klimov DK, Woodson SA: Kinetic partitioning mechanism as unifying theme in the folding of biomolecules. Theor Chem Acc 1997, 1:23-30. This review shows that the kinetic partitioning mechanism (KPM) derived from the concept of topological frustration explains the diverse folding behavior observed in proteins. Illustrations from protein and RNA literature are used to provide experimental support.
8. Jackson SE, Fersht AR: Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2:1 Evidence for a two-state transition. Biochemistry 1991, 30:10428-10435.
9. Sosnick TR, Mayne L, Hiller R, Englander SW: The barriers in protein folding. Nat Struct Biol 1994, 1:149-156.
10. Radford SE, Dobson CM: Insights into protein folding using physical techniques: Studies of lysozyme and α-lactalbumin. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol 1995, 348:17-25.
11. Kiefhaber T: Kinetic traps in lysozyme folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:9029-9033.
12. Schindler T, Herrler M, Marahiel MA, Schmid FX: Extremely rapid folding in the absence of intermediates. Nat Struct Biol 1995, 2:663-673.
13. Eaton WA, Munoz V, Thompson PA, Chan CK, Hofrichter J: Submillisecond kinetics of protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997,7:10-14. A detailed account of fast elementary events (such as the assembly of a helices and β turns) in protein folding is presented using novel experimental techniques. The authors define interesting conceptual questions, such as the upper bound to the rate of folding of single-domain proteins. They argue, using theoretical ideas and experiments, that, generally, proteins cannot fold faster than 1 μs.
14. Fersht AR: Nucleation mechanisms in protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997, 7:3-9. Protein engineering methods, pioneered by the author, are used to review evidence for the nucleation-collapse (NC) mechanism of two-state proteins. A lucid description of the NC mechanism in proteins is provided and contrasted with the well-known nucleation processes in other situations (the condensation of vapor, for example).
15. Honeycutt JD, Thirumalai D: Metastability of the folded states of globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990, 87:3526-3529.
16. Rey A, Skolnick J: Comparison of lattice Monte Carlo dynamics and Brownian dynamics folding pathways of a-helical hairpins. Chem Phys 1991, 158:199-219.
17. Wilson C, Doniach S: A computer model to dynamically simulate protein folding: Studies with crambin. Proteins 1989, 6:193-209.
18. Shakhnovich EI, Gutin AM: Engineering of stable and fast folding sequences of model proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993, 90:7195-7199.
19. Hao MH, Scheraga HA: Monte Carlo simulations of a first order transition for protein folding. J Phys Chem 1994, 98:4940-4948.
20. Socci ND, Onuchic JN: Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of protein-like heteropolymers: Monte Carlo histogram technique. J Chem Phys 1995, 103:4732-4744.
21. Quo Z, Brooks CL III, Boczko EM: Exploring the folding free energy surface of a three-helix bundle protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:10161-10166.
22. Shea JE, Nochomovitz YD, Quo Z, Brooks CL III: Exploring the space of protein folding Hamiltonians: The balance of forces in a minimalist β-barrel model. J Chem Phys 1998, 109:2895-2903. On the basis of an off-lattice Honeycutt-Thirumalai β-barrel model, an interesting method for studying the role of native versus non-native interactions is proposed. It is shown that weakening the non-native attractive interactions leads to more cooperative folding and reduces the temperature interval between the collapse and folding temperatures, which, in turn, assures more efficient folding of proteins.
23. He S, Scheraga HA: Brownien dynamics simulations of protein folding. J Chem Phys 1998, 108:287-300. This study reports the application of molecular dynamics simulations in dihedral angle space for protein folding thermodynamics and kinetics. Based on the performance of this algorithm in an off-lattice protein model, the authors conclude that it is faster and computationally more stable than traditional molecular dynamics performed in Cartesian coordinates.
24. Honeycutt JD, Thirumalai D: The nature of folded states of globular proteins. Biopolymers 1992, 32:695-709.
25. Guo Z. Thirumalai D: Kinetics of protein folding: Nucleation mechanism, timescales, and pathways. Biopolymers 1995, 36:83-103.
26. Guo Z, Thirumalai D: The nucleation-collapse mechanism in protein folding: Evidence for the non-uniqueness of the folding nucleus. Fold Des 1997, 2:377-391.
27. θ In particular, the authors show that, for two-state proteins ( σ ≈ O), the process of collapse and the acquisition of the native conformation occur almost simultaneously. Sequences with small σ can fold efficiently while maintaining their stability over a wide range of external conditions. These results generalize the findings for lattice models [41,44,63,70].
28. Thompson PA, Eaton WA, Hofrichter J: Laser temperature jump study of the helix-coil kinetics of an alanine peptide interpreted with a 'kinetic zipper' model. Biochemistry 1997, 36:9200-9210.
29. Munoz V, Thompson PA, Hofrichter J, Eaton WA: Folding dynamics and mechanism of β-hairpin formation. Nature 1997, 390:196-199. This paper reports the first measurement of the formation of a β hairpin using novel fast-folding experiments. The authors show that a β hairpin in a 16-mer peptide fragment of protein G forms in 6 μs. These experiments provide a direct validation of the predictions made in [27••,57••].
30. Eaton WA, Munoz V, Thompson PA, Henry ER, Hofrichter J: Kinetics and dynamics of loops, α-helices, β-hairpins, and fast-folding proteins. Accounts Chem Res 1999, 31:745-753.
31. Bopp MA, Jia Y, LI L, Cogdell RJ, Hochstrasser RM: Fluorescence and photobleaching dynamics of single light-harvesting complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:10630-10635.
32. Huang GS, Oas TG: Submillisecond folding of monomeric λ represser. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:6878-6882.
33. Williams S, Causgrove TP, Gilmanshin R, Fang KS, Callender RH, Woodruff WH, Dyer RB: Fast events in protein folding: Helix melting and formation in a small peptide. Biochemistry 1996, 35:691-697.
34. Ladurner AG, Fersht AR: Upper limit of the timescale for diffusion and chain collapse in chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. Nat Struct Biol 1999,6:28-31.
35. Itzhaki LS, Otzen DE, Fersht AR: The structure of the transition state of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 analyzed by protein engineering methods: Evidence for a nucleation-condensation mechanism for protein folding. J Mol Biol 1995, 254:260-288.
36. Viguera AR, Serrano L, Wilmanns M: Different folding transition states may result in the same native structure. Nat Struct Biol 1996,3:874-880.
37. Grancharova VP, Riddle DS, Santiago JV, Baker D: Important role of hydrogen bonds in the structurally polarized transition state for folding of the src SH3 domain. War Struct Biol 1998, 5:714-720. Using Φ value analysis, it was concluded that part of the native structure is highly structured in the transition state of the src SH3 domain. These data are taken to distinguish folding scenarios for the src SH3 domain from those observed in chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 and the P22 Arc repressor. The role of the native topology in determining the transition-state structure is underscored.
38. Martinez JC, Pisabarro MT, Serrano L: Obligatory steps in protein folding and the conformational diversity of the transition state. Nat Struct Biol 1998, 5:721-729. By studying the folding kinetics of mutants of the α-spectrin SH3 domain, the authors suggest that the transition states of β-sheet proteins are well structured as a result of the constraints of 'mechanical nuclei'.
39. Kolinski A, Skolnick J: Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. I. Lattice model and interaction scheme. Proteins 1994,18:338-352.
40. Socci ND, Onuchic JN: Folding kinetics of protein-like heteropolymers. J Chem Phys 1994,101:1519-1528.
41. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D: Factors governing the foldability of proteins. Proteins 1996, 26:411-441.
42. Unger R, Moult J: Local interactions dominate folding in a simple protein model. J Mol Biol 1996, 259:988-994.
43. Pande VS, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T: On the theory of folding kinetics for short proteins. Fold Des 1997, 2:109-114.
44. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D: Linking rates of folding in lattice models of proteins with underlying thermodynamic characteristics. J Chem Phys 1998, 109:4119-4125.
45. Klimov DK, Betancourt MR, Thirumalai D: Virtual atom representation of hydrogen bonds in minimal off-lattice models of helices: Effect on stability, cooperativity and kinetics. Fold Des 1998, 3:481-496.
46. Irback A, Peterson C, Potthast F, Sommelius O: Local interactions and protein folding: A 3D off-lattice approach. J Chem Phys 1997, 107:273-290.
47. Guo Z, Brooks CL III: Thermodynamics of protein folding: A statistical mechanical study of a small all β protein. Biopolymers 1997, 42:745-757.
48. Berry RS, Elmaci N, Rose JP, Vekhter B: Linking topography of its potential surface with the dynamics of folding of a protein model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:9520-9524.
49. Nymeyer H, Garcia AE, Onuchic JN: Folding funnels and frustration in off-lattice minimalist protein landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:5921-5928.
50. Mohanty D, Elber R, Thirumalai D, Beglov D, Roux B: Kinetics of peptide folding: Computer simulations of SYPFDV and peptide variants in water. J Mol Biol 1997, 272:423-442. A thorough molecular dynamics study of a full atomic model for a short peptide reveals that its folding bears features that are characteristic of larger proteins, such as kinetic traps, kinetic partitioning and so on.
51. Duan Y, Kollman PA: Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 1998, 282:740-744. This paper represents a milestone in all-atom simulations of proteins. The authors successfully integrated Newton equations of motion for the villin headpiece subdomain (HP-36) with explicit inclusion of solvent molecules for 1 μs. The folding time for this protein is expected to be about 6-50 μs (see Equation 2), which is well within the reach of present day computations. A detailed analysis of such trajectories is expected to give considerable insight into early events in the folding of small proteins.
52. Daggett V, Levitt M: Molecular dynamics simulations of helix denaturation. J Mol Biol 1992, 223:1121-1138.
53. Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL: Molecular dynamics simulations of the unfolding of apomyoglobin in water. Biochemistry 1993, 32:4175-4184.
54. Boczko EM, Brooks CL III: First principle calculation of the folding free energy of a three helix bundle protein. Science 1995, 21:393-396.
55. Demchuk E, Bashford D, Case DA: Dynamics of a type VI reverse turn in a linear peptide in aqueous solution. Fold Des 1997, 2:35-46.
56. Levitt M, Warshel A: Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 1975,253:694-697.
57. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D: Viscosity dependence of the folding rates of proteins. Phys Rev Lett 1997, 79:317-320. The viscosity dependence of rates of folding was examined using a number of simple models. The authors argue (especially for two-state folders) that, because the native conformation may be directly accessed from relatively open structures, the internal viscosity of the polypeptide chain is not significant in determining the folding rates. Internal viscosity will be important in the transition from misfolded semi-compact states to native state (see Figure 2) in sequences exhibiting KPM. The authors also predicted that, typically, β-turn structures can form in about 10 μs, which was subsequently verified in fast folding experiments by Munoz et al. [29••].
58. Shakhnovich E, Abkevich V, Ptitsyn O: Conserved residues and the mechanism of protein folding. Nature 1996, 379:96-98.
59. Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG: Protein folding funnels: The nature of the transition state ensemble. Fold Des 1996, 1:441-450.
60. Thirumalai D: From minimal models to real proteins: Timescales for protein folding. J Physique I 1995, 5:1457-1467.
61. Sosnick TR, Trewhella J: Denaturated states of ribonuclease A have compact dimensions and residual secondary structure. Biochemistry 1992, 31:8329-8335.
62. Ptitsyn OB: The molten globule state. In Protein Folding. Edited by Creighton TE. New York: Freeman; 1994:243-300.
63. Camacho CJ, Thirumalai D: Kinetics and thermodynamics of folding in model proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993, 90:6369-6372.
64. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D: Cooperativity in protein folding: From lattice models with side chains to real proteins. Fold Des 1998, 3:127-139.
65. Pitard E, Garel T, Orland H: Protein folding, anisotropic collapse, and blue phase. J Physique I 1997, 7:1201 -1210.
66. Barrick D, Baldwin RL: Three-state analysis of sperm whale apomyoglobin folding. Biochemistry 1993, 32:3790-3796.
67. Pande VS, Rokhsar DS: Is the molten globule a third phase of proteins? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:1490-1494.
68. Guo Z, Thirumalai D: Kinetics and thermodynamics of folding of a de novo designed four-helix bundle protein. J Mol Biol 1996, 263:323-343.
69. Anfinsen CB: Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973, 181:223-230.
70. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D: A criterion that determines the foldability of proteins. Phys Rev Lett 1996, 76:4070-4073.
71. Camacho CJ, Thirumalai D: A criterion that determines fast folding of proteins: A model study. Europhys Lett 1996, 35:627-630.
72. Fukugita M, Lancaster D, Mitchard M: A heteropolymer model study for the mechanism of protein folding. Biopolymers 1997, 41:239-250.
73. Go N: Theoretical studies of protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 1983, 12:183-210.
74. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D: Lattice models for proteins reveal multiple folding nuclei for nucleation-collapse mechanism. J Mol Biol 1998, 282:471-492. Extensive investigations of the nucleation mechanism using lattice models (of differing lengths and interaction potentials) give support to the multiple folding nuclei model. According to this view, native contacts participate with varying probabilities in folding nuclei. Some of the contacts occur with a higher probability in the transition state than others. The authors show that the average size of the folding nucleus is small, consisting of 10-15 residues.
75. Oxtoby DW: Nucleation of first-order phase transitions. Accounts Chem Res 1998, 31:91-97.
76. Arnold U, Ulbrich-Hofmann R: Kinetic and thermodynamic thermal stabilities of ribonuclease A and ribonuclease B. Biochemistry 1997, 36:2166-2172.
77. Perl D, Welker C, Schindler T, Schroder K, Marahiel MA, Jaenicke R, Schmid FX: Conservation of rapid two-state folding in mesophilic, thermophilic, and hyperthermophilic cold shock proteins. Nat Struct Biol 1998, 5:229-235.
78. Wetlaufer D: Nucleation, rapid folding, and globular intrachain regions in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973, 70:697-701.
79. Thirumalai D, Klimov DK: Fishing for folding nuclei in lattice models and proteins. Fold Des 1998, 3:R112-R118.
80. Matheson RR, Scheraga HA: A method for predicting nucleation sites for protein folding based on hydrophobia contacts. Macromolecules 1978,11:814-829.
81. Wolynes PG: Folding funnels and energy landscapes of larger proteins within the capillarity approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:6170-6175.
82. Camacho C, Thirumalai D: Minimum energy compact structures in random sequences of heteropolymers. Phys Rev Lett 1993, 71:2505-2508.
83. Thirumalai D, Guo Z: Nucleation mechanism for protein folding and theoretical predictions for hydrogen-exchange labeling experiments. Biopolymers 1995, 35:137-140.
84. Mantagne A, Radford SE, Dobson CM: Fast and slow tracks in lysozyme folding: Insight into the role of domains in the folding process. J Mol Biol 1997, 267:1068-1074. A detailed mapping of the pathways of folding of the hen-egg lysozyme provides direct validation of the kinetic partitioning mechanism. The authors show that 25% (Φ = 0.25) of the molecules fold fast and directly to the native state, whereas the remaining fraction fold by slower processes.
85. Pan J, Thirumalai D, Woodson S: Folding of RNA involves parallel pathways. J Mol Biol 1997, 273:7-13.
86. Lazaridis T, Karplus M: "New view" of protein folding reconciled with the old through multiple unfolding simulations. Science 1997, 252:672-708.
87. Huenberger PH, Mark AE, Gunsteren WF: Computational approaches to study protein unfolding: Hen egg white lysozyme as a case study. Proteins 1995, 21:196-213.
88. Duan Y, Wang L, Kollman PA: The early stage of folding of villin headpiece subdomain observed in a 200-nanosecond fully solvated molecular dynamics simulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:9897-9902.
89. Dyson HJ, Wright PE: Peptide conformation and protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1998, 3:60-65.
90. Daura X, Jaun B, Seebach D, van Gunsteren WF, Mark AE: Reversible peptide folding in solution by molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Biol 1998, 280:925-932.
91. Matouschek A, Matthews JM, Johnson CM, Fersht AR: Extrapolation to water of kinetic and equilibrium data for the unfolding of barnase in urea solutions. Protein Eng 1994, 7:1089-1095.