Minimalist models for protein folding and design

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 160-167

  Head Gordon, Teresa ^a   Brown, Scott ^a  

^a University of California at Berkeley   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE;

CALCULATION; CHEMICAL MODEL; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; GENOMICS; KINETICS; MOTIVATION; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; REVIEW; SOLVATION; STATISTICS;

EID: 0037398844     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(03)00030-7     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Onuchic J.N., Luthey-Schulten Z., Wolynes P.G. Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48:1997;545-600.
2. Go N: Protein folding as a stochastic process. J Stat Phys 1983:413-423.
3. Dill K.A., Chan H.S. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4:1997;10-19.
4. Bryngelson J.D., Wolynes P.G. Intermediates and barrier crossing in a random energy model (with applications to protein folding). J. Phys. Chem. 93:1989;6902-6915.
5. Sali A., Shakhnovich E., Karplus M. How does a protein fold. Nature. 369:1994;248-251.
6. Klimov D.K., Thirumalai D. Factors governing the foldability of proteins. Proteins. 26:1996;411-441.
7. Mirny L.A., Abkevich V.I., Shakhnovich E.I. How evolution makes proteins fold quickly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;4976-4981.
8. Cieplak M., Hoang T.X., Li M.S. Scaling of folding properties in simple models of proteins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83:1999;1684-1687.
9. Shea J.E., Onuchic J.N., Brooks C.L. Exploring the origins of topological frustration: design of a minimally frustrated model of fragment B of protein A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:1999;12512-12517.
10. Clementi C., Jennings P.A., Onuchic J.N. Prediction of folding mechanism for circular-permuted proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 311:2001;879-890 This paper substantiates the role of topological frustration in a joint experimental/theoretical study of circularly permuted proteins.
11. Koga N., Takada S. Roles of native topology and chain-length scaling in protein folding: a simulation study with a Go-like model. J. Mol. Biol. 313:2001;171-180 This paper analyzes folding rate constants and characteristics of the transition state ensemble and the denatured states in terms of native topology and chain length for 18 different proteins using a sequence-independent Gō model. The transition state ensemble of the model is consistent with experimental Φ-values for approximately half of the proteins, indicating that sequence dependence is important to folding for the other half.
12. Plaxco K.W., Simons K.T., Ruczinski I., David B. Topology, stability, sequence, and length: defining the determinants of two-state protein folding kinetics. Biochemistry. 39:2000;11177-11183 The authors make the important observation that the magnitude of the folding rate for simple two-state folders is strongly correlated with the average sequence separation between contacting residues in the native state. This emphasizes the role of native topology in determining the kinetics of folding, at least for small proteins.
13. Makarov D.E., Keller C.A., Plaxco K.W., Metiu H. How the folding rate constant of simple, single-domain proteins depends on the number of native contacts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;3535-3539.
14. Qin Z, Ervin J, Larios E, Gruebele M, Kihara H: Formation of a compact structured ensemble without fluorescence signature early during ubiquitin folding. J Phys Chem 2003, in press.
15. Krantz B.A., Mayne L., Rumbley J., Englander S.W., Sosnick T.R. Fast and slow intermediate accumulation and the initial barrier mechanism in protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 324:2002;359-371 The authors argue that the finding of early intermediates (extra barrier(s) that precede the rate-limiting barrier to folding) is an artifact of interpreting ultrafast experimental techniques.
16. Brooks C.L. Protein and peptide folding explored with molecular simulations. Acc. Chem. Res. 35:2002;447-454 Molecular simulations with emphasis on models with full atomic detail of polypeptide and solvent.
17. Duan Y., Kollman P.A. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science. 282:1998;740-744.
18. Shirts M., Pande V.S. Computing - Screen savers of the world unite! Science. 290:2000;1903-1904 The authors describe using world-wide distributed computing in the spirit of the SETI project to overcome the sampling problem for high-resolution protein folding models.
19. Allen F., Almasi G., Andreoni W., Beece D., Berne B.J., Bright A., Brunheroto J., Cascaval C., Castanos J., Coteus P.et al. Blue Gene: a vision for protein science using a petaflop supercomputer. IBM Systems Journal. 40:2001;310-327 This paper describes the design of special-purpose computer hardware and software for application to protein science.
20. Snow C.D., Nguyen N., Pande V.S., Gruebele M. Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics. Nature. 420:2002;102-106 A comparison of kinetics determined from experiment and simulation. The folding@home simulation predicted that protein BBA5 would fold in 6 μs, whereas experiment revealed an actual folding time of 7.5 μs.
21. Head-Gordon T., Wooley J.C. Computational challenges in structural and functional genomics. IBM Systems Journal. 40:2001;265-296 A blueprint for computational biology research over the next several decades.
22. Plaxco K.W., Simons K.T., Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 277:1998;985-994.
23. Nymeyer H., Socci N.D., Onuchic J.N. Landscape approaches for determining the ensemble of folding transition states: success and failure hinge on the degree of frustration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:2000;634-639 This paper shows that the connection between the folding kinetics and the thermodynamics of the transition state ensemble depends on the degree of energetic frustration. It also shows that interpretation of experimentally measured Φ-values as changes in free energy differences for a simple transition state ensemble is accurate and useful only for those proteins that are minimally frustrated and whose folding can be characterized by simple reaction coordinates.
24. Shimada J., Shakhnovich E.I. The ensemble folding kinetics of protein G from an all-atom Monte Carlo simulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;11175-11180 A recent extension of minimalist bead models to all-atom Gō potentials to characterize the folding of protein G. This paper shows that the presence of intermediates in folding may be lost when doing ensemble dynamics.
25. Clementi C., Garcia A., Onuchic J.N. Interplay among tertiary contacts, secondary structure formation and side-chain packing in the protein folding mechanism: an all-atom representation study. J. Mol. Biol. 326:2003;933-954 A study using an all-atom Gō potential to characterize the folding of proteins G and L. The addition of sidechain packing results in greater cooperativity of folding relative to sequence-independent Gō models.
26. Honeycutt J.D., Thirumalai D. Metastability of the folded states of globular proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:1990;3526-3529.
27. Guo Z.Y., Thirumalai D., Honeycutt J.D. Folding kinetics of proteins - a model study. J. Chem. Phys. 97:1992;525-535.
28. Guo Z., Thirumalai D. Kinetics and thermodynamics of folding of a de novo designed four-helix bundle protein. J. Mol. Biol. 263:1996;323-343.
29. Sorenson J.M., Head-Gordon T. Redesigning the hydrophobic core of a model beta-sheet protein: destabilizing traps through a threading approach. Proteins. 37:1999;582-591.
30. Sorenson J.M., Head-Gordon T. Matching simulation and experiment: a new simplified model for simulating protein folding. J. Comput. Biol. 7:2000;469-481 The first physico-chemical model for the α/β topology, based on the ubiquitin fold family.
31. Sorenson J.M., Head-Gordon T. Protein engineering study of protein L by simulation. J. Comput. Biol. 9:2002;35-54 The authors validated the folding of the minimalist protein L/G model by comparison with sequence mutation data and Φ-value analysis. This paper emphasizes the ability of minimalist models to fully analyze and characterize folding.
32. Sorensen J.M., Head-Gordon T. Toward minimalist models of larger proteins: a ubiquitin-like protein. Proteins. 46:2002;368-379 The extension of the physico-chemical model for protein L/G to investigate the folding of ubiquitin.
33. Brown S, Head-Gordon T: Sequence design for determining proteins that fold by alternative folding mechanisms. Protein Sci 2003, in press.
34. Hao M.H., Scheraga H.A. Designing potential energy functions for protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:1999;184-188.
35. Takada S., Luthey-Schulten Z., Wolynes P.G. Folding dynamics with nonadditive forces: a simulation study of a designed helical protein and a random heteropolymer. J. Chem. Phys. 110:1999;11616-11629.
36. Miyazawa S., Jernigan R.L. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J. Mol. Biol. 256:1996;623-644.
37. Karanicolas J., Brooks C.L. The origins of asymmetry in the folding transition states of protein L and protein G. Protein Sci. 11:2002;2351-2361 The development of a minimalist protein model that includes physical interactions using an MJ statistical potential on top of a Gō potential to realize a sequence-dependent model for characterizing proteins G and L.
38. Sorenson J.M., Hura G., Soper A.K., Pertsemlidis A., Head-Gordon T. Determining the role of hydration forces in protein folding. J. Phys. Chem. B. 103:1999;5413-5426.
39. Cheung M.S., Garcia A.E., Onuchic J.N. Protein folding mediated by solvation: water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;685-690 This paper describes the mechanism of folding of a simple SH3 model with explicit inclusion of a water reaction coordinate.
40. Gu H.D., Yi Q.A., Bray S.T., Riddle D.S., Shiau A.K., Baker D. A phage display system for studying the sequence determinants of protein folding. Protein Sci. 4:1995;1108-1117.
41. Park S.H., Oneil K.T., Roder H. An early intermediate in the folding reaction of the B1 domain of protein G contains a native-like core. Biochemistry. 36:1997;14277-14283.
42. Gu H.D., Kim D., Baker D. Contrasting roles for symmetrically disposed beta-turns in the folding of a small protein. J. Mol. Biol. 274:1997;588-596.
43. Plaxco K.W., Millett I.S., Segel D.J., Doniach S., Baker D. Chain collapse can occur concomitantly with the rate-limiting step in protein folding. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:1999;554-556.
44. Scalley M.L., Yi Q., Gu H.D., McCormack A., Yates J.R., Baker D. Kinetics of folding of the IgG binding domain of peptostreptoccocal protein L. Biochemistry. 36:1997;3373-3382.
45. Nauli S., Kuhlman B., Baker D. Computer-based redesign of a protein folding pathway. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:2001;602-605 Computational redesign and experimental verification of a switch in the folding pathway of protein G to favor the formation of the first β hairpin, similar to protein L.
46. Sheinerman F.B., Brooks C.L. Calculations on folding of segment B1 of streptococcal protein G. J. Mol. Biol. 278:1998;439-456.
47. Qi P.X., Sosnick T.R., Englander S.W. The burst phase in ribonuclease A folding and solvent dependence of the unfolded state. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5:1998;882-884.
48. Kauzmann W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv. Protein. Chem. 14:1959;1-59.
49. Kaya H., Chan H.S. Solvation effects and driving forces for protein thermodynamic and kinetic cooperativity: how adequate is native-centric topological modeling? J. Mol. Biol. 326:2003;911-931 This paper critically examines whether the use of Gō potentials, even when supplemented by physical hydration forces, is adequate for robust and predictive protein folding studies.
50. Sorenson J.M., Head-Gordon T. The importance of hydration for the kinetics and thermodynamics of protein folding: simplified lattice models. Fold Des. 3:1998;523-534.
51. Pratt L.R., Chandler D. Theory of the hydrophobic effect. J. Chem. Phys. 67:1977;3683-3704.
52. Hummer G., Garde S., Garcia A.E., Paulaitis M.E., Pratt L.R. Hydrophobic effects on a molecular scale. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:1998;10469-10482.
53. Rank J.A., Baker D. A desolvation barrier to hydrophobic cluster formation may contribute to the rate-limiting step in protein folding. Protein Sci. 6:1997;347-354.
54. Hura G., Sorenson J.M., Glaeser R.M., Head-Gordon T. Solution X-ray scattering as a probe of hydration-dependent structuring of aqueous solutions. Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design. 17:1999;97-118.
55. Pande V.S., Rokhsar D.S. Molecular dynamics simulations of unfolding and refolding of a beta-hairpin fragment of protein G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:1999;9062-9067.
56. Sheinerman F.B., Brooks C.L. Molecular picture of folding of a small alpha/beta protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;1562-1567.
57. •].
58. Zhang O.W., Formankay J.D. NMR studies of unfolded states of an SH3 domain in aqueous solution and denaturing conditions. Biochemistry. 36:1997;3959-3970.
59. Li H., Helling R., Tang C., Wingreen N. Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding. Science. 273:1996;666-669.
60. Li H., Tang C., Wingreen N.S. Are protein folds atypical? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;4987-4990.
61. Li H., Tang C., Wingreen N.S. Designability of protein structures: a lattice-model study using the Miyazawa-Jernigan matrix. Proteins. 49:2002;403-412 This theoretical study suggests that the most common folds of real proteins are the most atypical in the space of all possible structures and are more designable (defined as the number of sequences that have that structure as their unique lowest energy state), with enhanced thermodynamic stability. This paper confirms that these conclusions are sound whether using a hydrophobic-polar (HP) or MJ model.
62. Helling R., Li H., Melin R., Miller J., Wingreen N., Zeng C., Tang C. The designability of protein structures. J. Mol. Graph Model. 19:2001;157-167.
63. Larson S.M., England J.L., Desjarlais J.R., Pande V.S. Thoroughly sampling sequence space: large-scale protein design of structural ensembles. Protein Sci. 11:2002;2804-2813 The authors, using distributed computing, broadly explore sequence space with backbone flexibility to achieve large-scale protein design of structural ensembles.
64. Wikstrom M., Drakenberg T., Forsen S., Sjobring U., Bjorck L. Three-dimensional solution structure of an immunoglobulin light chain-binding domain of protein l - comparison with the IgG-binding domains of protein G. Biochemistry. 33:1994;14011-14017.