Near-field optical potential for a neutral atom

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-9

  Kobayashi, K ^a   Sangu, S ^a   Ito, H ^b   Ohtsu, M ^a,b  

^a JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18344378469     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.013806     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. M. Ohtsu, K. Kobayashi, H. Ito, and G.H. Lee, Proc. IEEE 88, 1499 (2000).
2. Near-Field Nano/Atom Optics and Technology, edited by M. Ohtsu (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998).
3. T. Yatsui, M. Kourogi, and M. Ohtsu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2090 (1998).
4. T. Saiki and K. Matsuda, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2773 (1999).
5. Y. Toda, S. Shinomori, K. Suzuki, and Y. Arakawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 517 (1998).
6. T. Matsumoto, M. Ohtsu, K. Matsuda, T. Saiki, H. Saito, and K. Nishi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3246 (1999).
7. V.V. Polonski, Y. Yamamoto, M. Kourogi, H. Fukuda, and M. Ohtsu, J. Microsc. 194, 545 (1999).
8. Y. Yamamoto, M. Kourogi, M. Ohtsu, V. Polonski, and G.H. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2173 (2000).
9. H. Hori, in Near Field Optics, edited by D.W. Pohl and D. Courjon (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993), pp. 105-114.
10. M. Ohtsu, S. Jiang, T. Pangaribuan, and M. Kozuma, in Near Field Optics, edited by D.W. Pohl and D. Courjon (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993), pp. 131-139.
11. M. Ohtsu and H. Hori, Near-Field Nano-Optics (Kluwer/Plenum, New York, 1999).
12. C. Girard, O.J.F. Martin, and A. Dereux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3098 (1995).
13. K. Cho, Y. Ohfuti, and K. Arima, Surf. Sci. 363, 378 (1996).
14. O. Keller, Ultramicroscopy 71, 1 (1998).
15. K. Kobayashi, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 66, S391 (1998).
16. K. Kobayashi and M. Ohtsu, J. Microsc. 194, 249 (1999), and references therein.
17. Yu.B. Ovchinnikov, S.V. Shul'ga, and V.I. Balykin, J. Phys. B 24, 3173 (1991).
18. H. Mabuchi and H.J. Kimble, Opt. Lett. 19, 749 (1994).
19. J.P. Dowling and J. Gea-Banacloche, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, edited by B. Bederson and H. Walther (Academic Press, San Diego, 1996), Vol. 37.
20. J. Dalibard and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1707 (1985).
21. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Atoms in Electromagnetic Fields (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
22. D.P. Craig and T. Thirunamachandran, Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics (Dover, New York, 1998).
23. H. Haken, Quantum Field Theory of Solids (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983).
24. J.J. Hopfield, Phys. Rev. 112, 1555 (1958).
25. J. Knoester and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. A 40, 7065 (1989).
26. B. Huttner and S.M. Barnett, Phys. Rev. A 46, 4306 (1992).
27. Since we are primarily interested in interactions between a neutral atom and a nanometric probe tip originated from optical near fields, we assume the situation that the neutral atom interacts with the probe tip only if incident light comes into a macroscopic matter system. In other words, of P-space bases, we employ eigenstates of an unperturbed Hamiltonian, where the neutral atom and the probe tip are isolated from each other. If one is interested in atomic interactions between a neutral atom and probe-tip atoms as well as optical near-field interactions, one can use appropriate eigenstates of an unperturbed Hamiltonian, including such interactions as P-space bases.
28. G. Grynberg, B. Lounis, P. Verkerk, J.-Y. Courtois, and C. Salomon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2249 (1993).
29. K. Kobayashi, S. Sangu, H. Ito, and M. Ohtsu, in Near-Field Optics: Principles and Applications, edited by X. Zhu and M. Ohtsu (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000).
30. In Sec. II we assume that we know eigenstates of a probe tip when it is isolated, for example, confined states in a sphere with a radius of a. Then the effective interaction potential between two arbitrary points with energy levels (one is located in the probe tip and the other is located at the center of the neutral atom) is derived as Eq. (18a). If we assume that the tip is made up of such linearly independent points, then the total potential is given as an integration of Eq. (18a) over the sphere.
31. V. Klimov, V.S. Letokhov, and M. Ducloy, Eur. Phys. J. D 5, 345 (1999).
32. D.W. Vernooy and H.J. Kinible, Phys. Rev. A 55, 1239 (1997).
33. V.V. Klimov and Ya.A. Perventsev, Quantum Electron. 29, 847 (1999).
34. W.R. Anderson, C.C. Bradley, J.J. McClelland, and R.J. Celotta, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2476 (1999).
35. V.I. Balykin, V.S. Letokhov, Yu.B. Ovchinnikov, and A.I. Sidorov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2137 (1988).
36. C.G. Aminoff, A.M. Steane, P. Bouyer, P. Desbiolles, J. Dalibard, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3083 (1993).
37. A. Landragin, J.-Y. Courtois, G. Labeyrie, N. Vansteenkiste, C.I. Westbrook, and A. Aspect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1464 (1996).
38. M.J. Renn, E.A. Donley, E.A. Cornell, C.E. Wieman, and D.Z. Anderson, Phys. Rev. A 53, R648 (1996).
39. H. Ito, T. Nakata, K. Sakaki, M. Ohtsu, K.I. Lee, and W. Jhe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4500 (1996).
40. E.A. Hinds, M.G. Boshier, and I.G. Hughes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 645 (1998).
41. J. Denschlag, D. Cassettari, and J. Schmiedmayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2014 (1999).
42. D. Müller, D.Z. Anderson, R.J. Grow, P.D.D. Schwindt, and E.A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5194 (1999).
43. H. Ito, K. Sakaki, M. Ohtsu, and W. Jhe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2496 (1997).