Sequence length variation, indel costs, and congruence in sensitivity analysis

Cladistics

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 15-30

  Aagesen, Lone ^a,c   Petersen, Gitte ^b   Seberg, Ole ^b  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c INSTITUTO DE BOTÁNICA DARWINION   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 17444427730     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00053.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Barker, F.K., Lutzoni, P.M., 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51, 625-637.
2. Barriel, V., 1994. Phylogénies moléculaires et insertions-délétions de nucléotides. C. R. Acad. Sci., Sci. la Vie, Paris, 317, 693-701.
3. Beishaw, R., Quicke, D.L.J., 2002. Robustness of Ancestral State Estimates. Evolution of Life History Strategy in Ichneumonoid Parasitoids. Syst. Biol. 51, 450-477.
4. Brocchieri, L., 2001. Phylogenetic inference from molecular sequences: review and critique. Theor. Populat. Biol. 59, 27-40.
5. Cunningham, C.W., 1997. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 46, 464-478.
6. Darlu, P., Lecointre, G., 2002. When does the incongruence length difference test fail? Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 432-437.
7. De Laet, J., in press. Parsimony and the problem of inapplicables in sequence data. In: Albert. V.A. (Ed.), Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 81-116.
8. De Laet, J., Wheeler, W.C., 2003. POY, Version 3.0.11. Published by Wheeler, Gladstein, and De Laet, 6 May 2003. Command line documentation.
9. Dolphin, K., Belshaw, R., Orme, C.D.L., Quicke, D.L.J., 2000. Noise and incongruence. Interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17, 401-406.
10. Dowton, M., Austin, A.D., 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy - the behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Syst. Biol. 51, 19-31.
11. Farris, J.S., 1973. On comparing the shapes of taxonomic trees. Syst. Zool. 22, 50-54.
12. Farris, J.S., 1981. Distance data in phylogenetic analysis. In: Funk, V.A., Brooks, D.R. (Eds), Advances in Cladistics: Proceedings of the First Meeting of the Willi Hennig Society. New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp. 3-22.
13. Farris, J.S., 1985. Distance data revisited. Cladistics, 1, 67-85.
14. Farris, J.S., 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics, 5, 417-419.
15. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A.G., Bult, C., 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics, 10, 315-319.
16. Fitch, W.M., 1993. Commentary on the letter from Ward. C. Wheeler. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 713-714.
17. Freudenstein, J.V., Chase, M.W., 2001. Analysis of Mitochondrial nad1b-c intron sequences in Orchidaceae: Utility and coding of length-change characters. Syst. Bot. 26, 643-657.
18. Frost, D.R., Rodrigues, M.T., Grant, T., Titus, T.A., 2001. Phylogenetics of the lizard genus Tropidurus (Squamata: Tropiduridae: Tropidurinae): Direct optimization, descriptive efficiency, and sensitivity analysis of congruence between moledular data and morphology. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 21, 352-371.
19. Giribet, G., 2001. Exploring the behavior of POY, a program for direct optimization of molecular data. Cladistics, 17, S60-S70.
20. Giribet, G., Edgecombe, G.D., Wheeler, W.C., 2001. Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature, 413, 157-161.
21. Golenberg, E.M., Clegg, M.T., Durbin, M.L., Doebley, J., Ma, D.P., 1993. Evolution of a noncoding region of the chloroplast genome. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2, 52-64.
22. Goloboff, P.A., 1998. NONA, Version 1.9. Program and documentation. Willi Hennig Society. URL: http://www.cladistics.org/.
23. Gotoh, O., 1982. An improved algorithm for matching biological sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 162, 705-708.
24. Grant, T., Kluge, A.G., 2003. Data exploration in phylogenetic inference: scientific, heuristic, or neither. Cladistics, 19, 379-418.
25. Hennequin, S., Ebihara, A., Ito, M., Iwatsuki, K., Dubuisson, J.-Y., 2003. Molecular systematics of the fern genus Hymenophyllum s. 1. (Hymenophyllaceae) based on chloroplastic coding and noncoding regions. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 27, 283-301.
26. Hsiao, C., Chatterton, N.J., Asay, K.H., Jensen, K.B., 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of the monogenomic species of the wheat tribe Triticeae (Poaceae), inferred from nuclear rDNA (internal transcribed spacer) sequences. Genome, 38, 211-223.
27. Kellogg, E.A., Appels, R., 1995. Intraspecific and interspecific variation in 5S RNA genes are decoupled in diploid wheat relatives. Genetics, 140, 325-343.
28. Kellogg, E.A., Appels, R., Mason-Gamer, R.J., 1996. When genes tell different stories: the diploid genera of Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Bot. 21, 321-347.
29. Kluge, A.G., Farris, J.S., 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18, 1-32.
30. Lee, M.S.Y., 2001. Unalignable sequences and molecular evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol, 16, 681-685.
31. Lutzoni, F., Wagner, P., Reeb, V., Zoller, S., 2000. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violation of positional homology. Syst. Biol. 49, 628-651.
32. Mason-Gamer, R.J., Weil, C.F., Kellogg, E.A., 1998. Granule-bound starch synthase: structure, function, and phylogenetic utility. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1658-1673.
33. Meier, R., Wiegmann, B., 2002. A phylogenetic analysis of Coelopidae (Diptera) based on morphological and DNA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25, 393-407.
34. Mickevich, M.L., Farris, J.S., 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30, 351-370.
35. Morrison, D.A., Ellis, J.T., 1997. Effects of nucleotide sequence alignment on phylogeny estimation: a case study of 18s rDNAs of Apicomplexa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 428-441.
36. Nixon, K.C., 1999. The parsimony ratchet a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics, 15, 407-414.
37. Nixon, K.C., 2002. Winclada, Version 100.08. Willi Hennig Society. URL: http://www.cladistics.org/.
38. Notredame, C., Holm, L., Higgins, D.G., 1998. COFFEE: an objective function for multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics, 14, 407-422.
39. Ogihara, Y., Terachi, T., Sasakuma, T., 1991. Molecular analysis of the hot spot region related to length mutations in wheat chloroplast DNAs. I. Nucleotide divergence of genes and intergenic spacer regions located in the hot spot region. Genetics, 129, 873-884.
40. Petersen. G., Seberg, O., 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of the Triticeae (Poaceae) based on rpoA seqeunce data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7, 217-230.
41. Petersen, G., Seberg, O., 2000. Phylogenetic evidence for excision of Stowaway miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in Triticeae (Poaceae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1589-1596.
42. Petersen, G., Seberg, O., 2003. Phylogenetic analyses of the diploid species of Hordeum (Poaceae) and revised classification of the genus. Syst. Bot. 2, 293-306.
43. Petersen, G., Seberg, O., Aagesen, L., Frederiksen, S., 2004. An empirical test of the treatment of indels during optimization alignment based on the phylogeny of the genus Secale (Poaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 30, 733-742.
44. Phillips, A., Janies, D., Wheeler, W.C., 2000. Multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16, 317-330.
45. Seberg, O., Frederiksen, S., 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of the monogenomic Triticeae (Poaceae) based on morphology. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 136, 75-97.
46. Simmons, M.P., Ochoterena, H., 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49, 369-381.
47. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., Higgins, D.G., 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res. 24, 4876-4882.
48. Thorne, J.L., Kishino, H., 1992. Freeing phylogenics from artifacts of alignment. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 1148-1162.
49. Vingron, M., von Haeseler, A., 1997. Towards integration of multiple alignment and phylogenetic tree construction. J. Comput Biol. 4, 23-34.
50. Watermann, M.S., Smith, T.F., Beyer, W.A., 1976. Some biological sequence metrics. Adv. Math. 20, 367-387.
51. Wheeler, W.C., 1993. The triangle inequality and character analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 707-712.
52. Wheeler, W.C., 1995. Sequence alignment, parameter sensitivity, and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular data. Syst. Biol. 44, 321-331.
53. Wheeler, W.C., 1996. Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics? Cladistics, 12, 1-9.
54. Wheeler, W.C., 1999a. Measuring topological congruence by extending character techniques. Cladistics, 15, 131-135.
55. Wheeler, W.C., 1999b. Fixed character states and the optimization of molecular sequence data. Cladistics, 15, 379-385.
56. Wheeler, W.C., 2001. Homology and the optimization of DNA sequence data. Cladistics, 17, S3-S11.
57. Wheeler, W.C., 2003a. Search-based optimization. Cladistics, 19, 348-355.
58. Wheeler, W.C., 2003b. Implied alignment: a synapomorphy-based multiple-sequence alignment method and its use in cladogram search. Cladistics, 19, 261-268.
59. Wheeler, W.C., Gladstein, D.S., DeLaet, J., Aaronson, L., 2003. POY, Version 3.0.11a. Available from ftp.amnh.org/pub/molecular/poy.
60. Wheeler, W.C., Hayashu C., 1998. The phylogeny of the extant Chelicerate orders. Cladistics, 14, 173-192.
61. Yoder, A.D., Irwin, J.A., Payseur, B.A., 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50, 408-424.
62. Young, N.D., Healy, J., 2003, GapCoder automates the use of indel characters in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 4, 6.