A phylogenetic analysis of Coelopidae (Diptera) based on morphological and DNA sequence data

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 393-407

  Meier, Rudolf ^a   Wiegmann, Brian M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COELOPA; COELOPIDAE; DIPTERA;

RIBOSOME DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FLY; GENETICS; MALE; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICS;

ANIMALS; DIPTERA; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; STATISTICS;

EID: 0036433757     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00276-2     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aldrich, J.M., 1929. Revision of the two-winged flies of the genus Coelopa Meigen in North America. Proc. USA Natl. Mus. 76, 1-6.
2. Arnaud, P.H., 1983. Aggregation of Coelopa (Neocoelopa) vanduzeei Cresson on the Monterey Peninsula coast, California, and notes on the family (Diptera: Coelopidae). Pan-Pac. Entomol. 58, 245-249.
3. Baker, R.H., DeSalle, R., 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46, 654-673.
4. Baker, R.H., Wilkinson, G.S., DeSalle, R., 2001. Phylogenetic utility of di7erent types of molecular data used to infer evolutionary relationships among stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Syst. Biol. 50, 87-105.
5. Baker, R., Yu, X., DeSalle, R., 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9, 427-436.
6. Blanche, K.R., 1992. Preliminary observations on the distribution and abundance of seaweed flies (Diptera: Coelopidae) on beaches in the Gosford district of New South Wales, Australia. Aust. J. Ecol. 17, 27-34.
7. Bremer, K., 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295-304.
8. Bull, J.J., Huelsenbeck, J.P., Cunningham, C.W., Swofford, D.L., Waddell, P.J., 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 384-397.
9. Butlin, R.K, Read, I.L., Day, T.H., 1982. The effects of a chromosomal inversion on adult size and male mating success in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity 49, 51-62.
10. Chirgwin, J.M., Przybyla, A.E., MacDonald, R.J., Rutter, W.J., 1979. Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 18, 52-94.
11. Crean, C.S., Dunn, D.W., Day, T.H., Gilburn, A.S., 2000. Female mate choice for large males in several species of seaweed fly (Diptera: Coelopidae). Anim. Behav. 59, 121-126.
12. Crean, C.S., Gilburn, A.S., 1998. Sexual selection as a side-effect of sexual conflict in the seaweed fly Coelopa ursina (Diptera: Coelopidae). Anim. Behav. 56, 1405-1410.
13. Day, T.H., Foster, S.P., Engelhard, G., 1990. Mating behavior in seaweed flies (Coelopa frigida). J. Ins. Behav. 3, 105-120.
14. Day, T.H., Gilburn, A.S., 1997. Sexual selection in seaweed flies. Adv. Study Behav. 26, 1-57.
15. Dierschke, V., 1998. High profit at high risk for juvenile dunlins Calidris alpina stopping over at Helgoland (German Bight). Ardea 86, 59-69.
16. Dobson, T., 1976. Seaweed flies (Diptera: Coelopidae, etc). In: Cheng, L. (Ed.), Marine Insects. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 447-463, Chapter 16.
17. Eernisse, D.J., Kluge, A.G., 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 1170-1195.
18. Egglishaw, H.J., 1960. Studies on the family Coelopidae (Diptera). Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 112, 109-140.
19. Eriksson, T., 1998. AutoDecay, Version 4.0. (Program Distributed by the Author). Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
20. Farris, J.S., 1988. Hennig86, Version 1.5. (Program Distributed by the Author). Port Jefferson Station, New York.
21. Fitch, W.M., Smith, T.F., 1983. Optimal sequence alignments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 1382-1386.
22. Galina, T.P., Ortega, R.A.R., Schmidt, H., Blazquez, C., 1997. September diet and reproductive state of Uta stansburiana (Phrynosomatidae) at Isla San Roque, Baja California Sur, Mexico. J. Arid Environ. 37, 65-70.
23. Gift, N., Stevens, P.F., 1997. Vagaries in the delimitation of character states in quantitative variation - An experimental study. Syst. Biol. 46, 112-125.
24. Gilbrun, A.S., Day, T.H., 1994. Evolution of female choice in seaweed flies: Fisherian and good genes mechanisms operate in different populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 257, 303-309.
25. Gilburn, A.S., Foster, S.P., Day, T.H., 1993. Genetic correlations between a female mating preference and the male preferred character in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Evolution 47, 1788-1795.
26. Giribet, G., Distel, D.L., Polz, M., Sterrer, W., Wheeler, W.C., 2000. Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the Acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulidae, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: A combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 49, 539-563.
27. Giribet, G., Wheeler, W.C., 1999. On gaps. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13, 132-143.
28. Gladstein, D., Wheeler, W., 2001. POY. Phylogeny Reconstruction Via Optimization of DNA Data. Program and Documentation. Documentation and program distributed by American Museum of Natural History, New York.
29. Goloboff, P.A., 1993. NONA. Noname, Version 1.15 (Program and Documentation Distributed by J.M. Carpenter) American Museum of Natural History, New York.
30. Hardy, D.E., 1962. Insects of Macquarie Island, Diptera: Coelopidae. Pac. Ins. 4, 963-971.
31. Harrison, R.A., 1959. Acalypterate Diptera of New Zealand. Bull. N.Z. Dept. Sci. Ind. Res. 128, 1-382.
32. Harrison, R.A., 1976. The Arthropoda of the southern islands of New Zealand (9). Diptera. J. R. Soc. New Zealand 6, 107-152.
33. Hennig, W., 1937. 52. Coelopidae. In: E. Lindner (Ed.), Die Fliegen der Pal Arktischen Region. Lfg. 106, Teil 52, E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, pp. 1-39.
34. Hickson, R.E., Simon, C., Perrey, S.W., 2000. The performance of several multiple-sequence alignment programs in relation to secondary-structure features for rRNA sequence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 530-539.
35. Hodge, S., Arthur, W., 1997. Asymmetrical interactions between species of seaweed fly. J. Anim. Ecol. 66, 743-754.
36. Kawasaki, E.S., 1990. Amplification of RNA. In: Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 21-27.
37. Larson, A., 1998. The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic systematics. In: DeSalle, R., Schierwater, B. (Eds.), Molecular Approaches to Ecology and Evolution. Birkhäuser, Boston, pp. 275-296.
38. Leggett, M.C., Wilcockson, R.W., Day, T.H., 1996. The genetic effects of competition in seaweed flies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 57, 1-11.
39. McAlpine, D.K., 1991. Review of the Australian kelp flies (Diptera: Coelopidae). Syst. Entomol. 16, 29-84.
40. Miyamoto, M.M., 1985a. Congruence among character sets in phylogenetic studies of the frog genus Leptodactylus. Syst. Zool. 34, 43-51.
41. Miyamoto, M.M., 1985b. Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics 1, 186-189.
42. Moeller, J., 1965. Ökologische Untersuchungen über die terrestrische Arthropodenfauna im Anwurf mariner Algen. Z. Morphol. Kol. Tiere 55, 530-586.
43. Morrison, D.A., Ellis, J.T., 1997. Effects of nucleotide sequence alignment on phylogeny estimation: A case study of 18S rDNAs of Apicomplexa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 428-441.
44. Oddane, B., 2001. Nordflaggermus Eptesicus nilssonii påinsektjakt langs Jærstrendene. Fauna 54, 121-123.
45. Oldroyd, H., 1954. The seaweed fly nuisance. Discovery 15, 198-202.
46. Poinar, G., 1977. Observations on the kelp fly, Coelopa vanduzeei Cresson in Southern California. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 53, 81-86.
47. Phillips, D.S., Arthur, W., 1994. Observations on the distribution of seaweed fly larvae and other invertebrates within a wrack-bed. Entomologist 113, 154-163.
48. Phillips, D.S., Leggett, M.C., Wilcockson, R., Day, T.H., Arthur, W., 1995a. Coexistence of competing species of seaweed flies: The role of temperature. Ecol. Entomol. 20, 65-74.
49. Phillips, D.S., Arthur, W., Leggett, M.C., Day, T.H., 1995b. Differential use of seaweed species by British seaweed flies, Coelopa spp. (Diptera: Coelopidae) with a description of the egg morphology of the two species. Entomologist 114, 158-165.
50. Phillips, A., Janies, D., Wheeler, W.C., 2000. Multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16, 317-330.
51. Rebelo, A.G., 1987. Mass emigration of kelp flies (Coelopidae). J. Entomol. Soc. South Afr. 50, 257-260.
52. Remmert, H., 1957. Ecological separation of species in Coelopa (Diptera, Insecta). Nature 179, 788.
53. Simmons, M.P., Ochoterena, H., 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49, 369-381.
54. Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H., Flook, P., 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87, 651-701.
55. Smith, S.W., Overbeek, R., Woese, C.R., Gilbert, W., Gillevet, P.M., 1994. The genetic data environment an expandable GUI for multiple sequence analysis. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 10, 671-675.
56. Staden, R., 1996. The Staden sequence analysis package. Mol. Biotechnol. 5, 233-241.
57. Swofford, D.L., 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? In: Miyamoto, M.M., Cracraft, J. (Eds.), Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 295-346.
58. Swofford, D.L., 2001. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using parsimony (and Other Methods), Version 4.0b.7. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
59. Vogler, A.P., DeSalle, R., 1994. Evolution and phylogenetic information content of the ITS-1 region in the tiger beetle Cicindela dorsalis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11, 393-405.
60. Waterman, M.S., Eggert, M., Lander, E., 1992. Parametric sequence comparisons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 6090-6093.
61. Weall, C.V., Gilburn, A.S., 2000. Factors influencing the choice of female mate rejection strategies in the seaweed fly Coelopa nebularum (Diptera: Coelopidae). J. Ins. Behav. 13, 539-552.
62. Wheeler, W.C., 1995. Sequence alignment, parameter sensitivity, and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular data. Syst. Biol. 44, 321-331.
63. Wheeler, W.C., 1996. Optimization alignment: The end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics? Cladistics 12, 1-9.
64. Whiting, M.F., Carpenter, J.C., Wheeler, Q.D., Wheeler, W.C., 1997. The Strepsiptera problem: Phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 46, 1-68.
65. Yang, L., Wiegmann, B.M., Yeates, D.K., Irwin, M.E., 2000. Higher-level phylogeny of the Therevidae (Diptera: Insecta) based on 28S ribosomal and elongation factor-1α gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 15, 440-451.