Modeling and control of contact between constrained rigid bodies

IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 82-92

  Featherstone, Roy ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Contact model; Force control; Robot dynamics

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); END EFFECTORS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FORCE CONTROL; KINEMATICS; UNIVERSAL JOINTS;

FREE-BODY CONTACT; RIGID BODIES; ROBOT DYNAMICS; VECTOR SPACES;

MOTION CONTROL;

EID: 1542376034     PISSN: 1042296X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TRA.2003.820930     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. R. J. Anderson and M. W. Spong, "Hybrid impedance control of robotic manipulators," IEEE J. Robot. Automat., vol. 4, pp. 549-556, Oct. 1988.
2. H. Bruyninckx, S. Demey, S. Dutré, and J. De Schutter, "Kinematic models for model-based complaint motion in the presence of uncertainty," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 14, pp. 465-482, Oct. 1995.
3. A. De Luca and C. Manes, "Modeling of robots in contact with a dynamic environment," IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat., vol. 10, pp. 542-548, Aug. 1994.
4. J. De Schutter, D. Torfs, H. Bruyninckx, and S. Dutré, "Invariant hybrid force/position control of a velocity controlled robot with compliant end-effector using modal decoupling," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 16, pp. 340-356, June 1997.
5. K. P. Jankowski and H. A. ElMaraghy, "Dynamic decoupling for hybrid control of rigid/flexible-joint robots interacting with the environment," IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat., vol. 8, pp. 519-534, Oct. 1992.
6. L. D. Joly, C. Andriot, and V. Hayward, "Mechanical analogies in hybrid position/force control," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, 1997, pp. 835-840.
7. O. Khatib, "A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation," IEEE J. Robot. Automat., vol. RA-3, pp. 43-53, Feb. 1987.
8. H. Lipkin and J. Duffy, "Hybrid twist and wrench control for a robotic manipulator," ASME J. Mechan., Transmissions, Automat. Des., vol. 110, pp. 138-144, June 1988.
9. G. Liu and Z. Li, "A unified geometric approach to modeling and control of constrained mechanical systems," IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat., vol. 18, pp. 574-587, Aug. 2002.
10. M. T. Mason, "Compliance and force control for computer controlled manipulators," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. SMC-11, pp. 418-432, June 1981.
11. N. H. McClamroch and D. Wang, "Feedback stabilization and tracking of constrained robots," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 33, pp. 419-426, May 1988.
12. M. H. Raibert and J. J. Craig, "Hybrid position/force control of manipulators," ASME J. Dynam. Syst., Meas., Contr., vol. 103, pp. 126-133, June 1981.
13. J. M. Selig and P. R. McAree, "A simple approach to invariant hybrid control," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, 1996, pp. 2238-2245.
14. T. Yoshikawa, "Dynamic hybrid position force control of robot manipulators - Description of hand constraints and calculation of joint driving force," IEEE J. Robot Automat., vol. RA-3, pp. 386-392, Oct. 1987.
15. ____, "Force control of robot manipulators," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, 2000, pp. 220-226.
16. T. Yoshikawa And X.-Z. Zheng, "Coordinated dynamic hybrid position/force control for multiple robot manipulators handling one constrained object," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 12, pp. 219-230, June 1993.
17. K. L. Doty, C. Melchiorri, and C. Bonivento, "A theory of generalized inverses applied to robotics," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 12, pp. 1-19, Feb. 1993.
18. J. Duffy, "The fallacy of modern hybrid control theory that is based on "orthogonal complements" of twist and wrench spaces," J. Robot. Syst., vol. 7, pp. 139-144, Apr. 1990.
19. R. Featherstone. On the limits on invariance inthe twist/wrench and motor representations of motion and force vectors. Ball 2000 [Online]. Available: http://helix.gatech.edu/ball2000/
20. J. De Schutter and H. Bruyninckx, "Model-based specification and execution of compliant motion," presented at the IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Nice, France, 1992. Tutorial M6.
21. K.-S. Chang and O. Khatib, "Operational space dynamics: Efficient algorithms for modeling and control of branching mechanisms," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, 2000, pp. 850-856.
22. R. Featherstone and O. Khatib, "Load independence of the dynamically consistent inverse of the Jacobian matrix," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 16, pp. 168-170, Apr. 1997.
23. O. Khatib, "Inertial properties in robotic manipulation: An object-level framework," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 14, pp. 19-36, Feb. 1995.
24. D. Ruspini and O. Khatib, "A framework for multicontact multibody dynamic simulation and haptic display," in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokamatsu, Japan, 2000, pp. 1322-1327.
25. R. Featherstone, "A dynamic model of contact between a robot and an environment with unknown dynamics," in Robotics Research: The Tenth International Symosium, R. A. Jarvis and A. Zelinsky, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp. 433-446.
26. R. Featherstone and A. Fijany, "A technique for analyzing constrained rigid-body systems and its application to the constraint force algorithm," IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat., vol. 15, pp. 1140-1144, Dec. 1999.
27. R. Featherstone, Robot Dynamics Algorithms. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 1987.
28. K. Kreutz-Delgado, A. Jain, and G. Rodriguez, "Recursive formulation of operational space control," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 11, pp. 320-328, Aug. 1992.
29. K. W. Lilly and D. E. Orin, "Alternate formulations for the manipulator inertia matrix," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 10, pp. 64-74, Feb. 1991.
30. M. W. Walker and D. E. Orin, "Efficient dynamic computer simulation of robotic mechanisms," ASME J. Dynam. Syst., Meas. Contr., vol. 104, pp. 205-211, Sept. 1982.