Effects of consequences of advice on patterns of rule control and rule choice

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-21

  Schmitt, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Advice; Button press; College students; Rule choice; Rule control; Rule following; Rule governed behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007155571     PISSN: 00225002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baron, A., & Galizio, M. (1983). Instructional control of human operant behavior. Psychological Record, 33, 495-520.
2. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
3. Catania, A. C., Matthews, B. A., & Shimoff, E. (1982). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 233-248.
4. Catania, A. C., Shimoff, E., & Matthews, B. A. (1989). An experimental analysis of rule-governed behavior. In S. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 119-150). New York: Plenum.
5. Cerutti, D. T. (1989). Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 259-276.
6. Chase, P. N., & Danforth, J. S. (1991). The role of rules in concept learning. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 205-225). Reno, NV: Context Press.
7. Emerson, R. (1981). Social exchange theory. In M. Rosenberg & R. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 30-65). New York: Basic Books.
8. Fantino, E. (1998). Behavior analysis and decision making. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 355-364.
9. Fantino, E., & Logan, C. A. (1979). The experimental analysis of behavior: A biological perspective. San Francisco: Freeman.
10. Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 45-55.
11. Galizio, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: Instructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 53-70.
12. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
13. Hayes, S. C. (Ed.). (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum.
14. Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Haas, J. R., & Greenway, D. E. (1986). Instructions, multiple schedules, and extinction: Distinguishing rule-governed from schedule-controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 137-147.
15. Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., & Korn, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237-256.
16. Hayes, S. C., Zettle, R. D., & Rosenfarb, I. (1989). Rule-following. In S. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 191-220). New York: Plenum.
17. Homans, G. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
18. Home, P. J., & Löwe, C. F. (1993). Determinants of human performance on concurrent schedules. Journal the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 29-60.
19. Hsee, G. K., Salovey, P., & Abelson, R. P. (1994). The quasi-acceleration relation: Satisfaction as a function of the change of velocity of outcome over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 96-111.
20. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
21. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
22. Loewenstein, G. F., & Prelec, D. (1993). Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psychological Review, 100, 91-108.
23. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. Malott, R. W. (1989). The achievement of evasive goals: Control by rules describing contingencies that are not direct acting. In S. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 269-322). New York: Plenum.
25. Matthews, B. A., Catania, A. C., & Shimoff, E. (1985). Effects of uninstructed verbal behavior on nonverbal responding: Contingency descriptions versus performance descriptions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 155-164.
26. Schmitt, D. R., & Kemper, T. D. (1996). Preference for different sequences of increasing or decreasing rewards. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 89-101.
27. Shimoff, E., Matthews, B. A., & Catania, A. C. (1986). Human operant performance: Sensitivity and pseudosensitivity to contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 149-157.
28. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
29. Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67-85.
30. Vauglin, M. (1989). Rule-governed behavior in behavior analysis: A theoretical and experimental history. In S. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 97-118). New York: Plenum.