Polarizing without a C(l)ue

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 526-533

  Sohrmann, Marc ^a   Peter, Matthias ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIN;

CELL POLARITY; CHEMOTAXIS; CYTOSKELETON; DICTYOSTELIUM DISCOIDEUM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NEUTROPHIL; NONHUMAN; POLARIZATION; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; CELL POLARITY; CUES; FEEDBACK, BIOCHEMICAL; HUMANS;

DICTYOSTELIUM DISCOIDEUM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 1442353156     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2003.08.006     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Drubin D.G., Nelson W.J. Origins of cell polarity. Cell. 84:1996;335-344.
2. Drubin D.G. Cell Polarity. 2000;Oxford University Press.
3. Wedlich-Soldner R., Li R. Spontaneous cell polarization: undermining determinism. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:2003;267-270.
4. Brownlee C., Bouget F.Y. Polarity determination in Fucus: from zygote to multicellular embryo. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 9:1998;179-185.
5. Gerhart J., et al. Cortical rotation of the Xenopus egg: consequences for the anteroposterior pattern of embryonic dorsal development. Development. 107:(Suppl.):1989;37-51.
6. Kirschner M., et al. Molecular 'vitalism'. Cell. 100:2000;79-88.
7. Turing A. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 237:1952;37-72.
8. Gierer A., Meinhardt H. A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik. 12:1972;30-39.
9. Meinhardt H., Gierer A. Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition. BioEssays. 22:2000;753-760.
10. Meinhardt H. The Algorithmic Beauty of Sea Shells. 1998;Springer.
11. Bähler J., Peter M. Cell polarity in yeast. Drubin D.G. Frontiers in Molecular Biology: Cell Polarity. 2000;21-77 Oxford University Press.
12. Pruyne D., Bretscher A. Polarization of cell growth in yeast. I. Establishment and maintenance of polarity states. J. Cell Sci. 113:2000;365-375.
13. Pruyne D., Bretscher A. Polarization of cell growth in yeast. J. Cell Sci. 113:2000;571-585.
14. Chang F., Peter M. Yeasts make their mark. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:2003;294-299.
15. Richman T.J., et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc42p localizes to cellular membranes and clusters at sites of polarized growth. Eukaryotic Cell. 1:2002;458-468.
16. Chant J. Cell polarity in yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 15:1999;365-391.
17. Gulli M.P., Peter M. Temporal and spatial regulation of Rho-type guanine-nucleotide exchange factors: the yeast perspective. Genes Dev. 15:2001;365-379.
18. Gulli M.P., et al. Phosphorylation of the Cdc42 exchange factor Cdc24 by the PAK-like kinase Cla4 may regulate polarized growth in yeast. Mol. Cell. 6:2000;1155-1167.
19. Wedlich-Soldner R., et al. Spontaneous cell polarization through actomyosin-based delivery of the Cdc42 GTPase. Science. 299:2003;1231-1235.
20. Weiner O.D., et al. Cell polarity in response to chemoattractants. Drubin D.G. Frontiers in Molecular Biology: Cell Polarity. 2000;201-239 Oxford University Press.
21. Pollard T.D., Borisy G.G. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell. 113:2003;549.
22. Small J.V., et al. How do microtubules guide migrating cells? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:2002;957-964.
23. Ridley A.J. Rho GTPases and cell migration. J. Cell Sci. 114:2001;2713-2722.
24. 3 and polarity during neutrophil chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 160:2003;375-385.
25. Allen W.E., et al. A role for Cdc42 in macrophage chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 141:1998;1147-1157.
26. Iijima M., et al. Temporal and spatial regulation of chemotaxis. Dev. Cell. 3:2002;469-478.
27. Parent C.A., et al. G protein signaling events are activated at the leading edge of chemotactic cells. Cell. 95:1998;81-91.
28. Meili R., et al. Chemoattractant-mediated transient activation and membrane localization of Akt/PKB is required for efficient chemotaxis to cAMP in Dictyostelium. EMBO J. 18:1999;2092-2105.
29. Servant G., et al. Polarization of chemoattractant receptor signaling during neutrophil chemotaxis. Science. 287:2000;1037-1040.
30. Li, Z. et al. Directional sensing requires Gβγ-mediated PAK1 and PIXα-dependent activation of Cdc42. Cell (in press).
31. Wera S., et al. Phosphoinositides in yeast: genetically tractable signalling. FEM Yeast Res. 1:2001;9-13.
32. Insall R.H., Weiner O.D. PIP3, PIP2, and cell movement - similar messages, different meanings? Dev. Cell. 1:2001;743-747.
33. Devreotes P., Janetopoulos C. Eukaryotic chemotaxis: distinctions between directional sensing and polarization. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2003;20445-20448.
34. Xiao Z., et al. Dynamic distribution of chemoattractant receptors in living cells during chemotaxis and persistent stimulation. J. Cell Biol. 139:1997;365-374.
35. Servant G., et al. Dynamics of a chemoattractant receptor in living neutrophils during chemotaxis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 10:1999;1163-1178.
36. Jin T., et al. Localization of the G protein βγ complex in living cells during chemotaxis. Science. 287:2000;1034-1036.
37. Janetopoulos C., et al. Receptor-mediated activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins in living cells. Science. 291:2001;2408-2411.
38. Ueda M., et al. Single-molecule analysis of chemotactic signaling in Dictyostelium cells. Science. 294:2001;864-867.
39. Jackson C.L., et al. S. cerevisiae α pheromone receptors activate a novel signal transduction pathway for mating partner discrimination. Cell. 67:1991;389-402.
40. Chen L., Davis N.G. Recycling of the yeast a-factor receptor. J. Cell Biol. 151:2000;731-738.
41. Butty A.C., et al. A positive feedback loop stabilizes the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24 at sites of polarization. EMBO J. 21:2002;1565-1576.
42. 3- and Rho GTPase-mediated positive feedback loop regulates neutrophil polarity. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:2002;509-513.
43. 3- and Gβγ-regulated guanine-nucleotide exchange factor for Rac. Cell. 108:2002;809-821.
44. Wang F., et al. Lipid products of PI(3)Ks maintain persistent cell polarity and directed motility in neutrophils. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:2002;513-518.
45. Gomez-Mouton C., et al. Segregation of leading-edge and uropod components into specific lipid rafts during T cell polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;9642-9647.
46. Seveau S., et al. Cytoskeleton-dependent membrane domain segregation during neutrophil polarization. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:2001;3550-3562.
47. Pierini L.M., et al. Membrane lipid organization is critical for human neutrophil polarization. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2003;10831-10841.
48. Bagnat M., Simons K. Cell surface polarization during yeast mating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;14183-14188.
49. Ziman M., et al. Mutational analysis of CDC42Sc, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene that encodes a putative GTP-binding protein involved in the control of cell polarity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:1991;3537-3544.
50. Richman T.J., Johnson D.I. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc42p GTPase is involved in preventing the recurrence of bud emergence during the cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2000;8548-8559.
51. Caviston J.P., et al. Singularity in budding: a role for the evolutionarily conserved small GTPase Cdc42p. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;12185-12190.
52. Bose I., et al. Assembly of scaffold-mediated complexes containing Cdc42p, the exchange factor Cdc24p, and the effector Cla4p required for cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation of Cdc24p. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;7176-7186.
53. Meinhardt H., Gierer A. Applications of a theory of biological pattern formation based on lateral inhibition. J. Cell Sci. 15:1974;321-346.
54. Hing H., et al. Pak functions downstream of Dock to regulate photoreceptor axon guidance in Drosophila. Cell. 97:1999;853-863.
55. Funamoto S., et al. Spatial and temporal regulation of 3-phosphoinositides by PI 3-kinase and PTEN mediates chemotaxis. Cell. 109:2002;611-623.
56. Iijima M., Devreotes P. Tumor suppressor PTEN mediates sensing of chemoattractant gradients. Cell. 109:2002;599-610.
57. Xu, S. et al. Divergent signals and cytoskeletal assemblies explain self-organizing polarity in neutrophils. Cell (in press).
58. van Oudenaarden A., Theriot J.A. Cooperative symmetry-breaking by actin polymerization in a model for cell motility. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:1999;493-499.
59. Verkhovsky A.B., et al. Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm. Curr. Biol. 9:1999;11-20.
60. Euteneuer U., Schliwa M. Persistent, directional motility of cells and cytoplasmic fragments in the absence of microtubules. Nature. 310:1984;58-61.
61. Chung C.Y., Firtel R.A. PAKa, a putative PAK family member, is required for cytokinesis and the regulation of the cytoskeleton in Dictyostelium discoideum cells during chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 147:1999;559-576.
62. Chung C.Y., et al. Control of cell polarity and chemotaxis by Akt/PKB and PI3 kinase through the regulation of PAKa. Mol. Cell. 7:2001;937-947.
63. Chung C.Y., et al. Signaling pathways controlling cell polarity and chemotaxis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26:2001;557-566.
64. Lew D.J., Reed S.I. Morphogenesis in the yeast cell cycle: regulation by Cdc28 and cyclins. J. Cell Biol. 120:1993;1305-1320.
65. Nern A., Arkowitz R.A. G proteins mediate changes in cell shape by stabilizing the axis of polarity. Mol. Cell. 5:2000;853-864.
66. Ayscough K.R., et al. High rates of actin filament turnover in budding yeast and roles for actin in establishment and maintenance of cell polarity revealed using the actin inhibitor Latrunculin-a. J. Cell Biol. 137:1997;399-416.
67. Ayscough K.R., Drubin D.G. A role for the yeast actin cytoskeleton in pheromone receptor clustering and signalling. Curr. Biol. 8:1998;927-930.
68. Levchenko A., Iglesias P.A. Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. Biophys. J. 82:2002;50-63.
69. Parent C.A., Devreotes P.N. A cell's sense of direction. Science. 284:1999;765-770.