In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 25-31

  Friedl, K H ^a   Schmalz, G ^b   Hiller, K A ^b   Saller, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Ceramics; Clinical trial; Inlays; Quantitative margin analysis

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; FELDSPAR; POTASSIUM DERIVATIVE; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECURRENT DISEASE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE; VISCOSITY;

ADULT; ALUMINUM SILICATES; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CLINICAL TRIALS; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INLAYS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MIDDLE AGED; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; RECURRENCE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0029685564     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)00053-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Schiele R. Die Amalgamfüllung-Verträglichkeit. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1991; 46: 515-518.
2. Qualtrough AJE, Wilson NHF and Smith GA. The porcelain inlay: a historical view. Oper Dent 1990; 15: 61-70.
3. O'Brien WJ. Dental Materials - Properties and Selection. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 1989; pp. 403.
4. Anusavice KJ, Shen C and Lee RB. Strengthening of feldspathic porcelain by ion exchange and tempering. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1134-1138.
5. Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF, Holloway JA and Niemiec MS. Enhanced chemcial strengthening of feldspathic dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 1429-1433.
6. Piddock V, Qualtrough AJ and Brough I. An investigation of an ion strengthening paste for dental porcelains. Int J Prosthodont 1991; 4: 132-137.
7. Derand T. Stress analysis of cemented or resin-bonded loaded porcelain inlays. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 21-24.
8. Marx R. Moderne keramische Werkstoffe für ästhetische Restaurationen - Verstärkung und Bruchzähigkeit. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993; 48: 229-236.
9. Jensen ME. A two-year clinical study of posterior etched-porcelain resin-bonded restorations. Am J Dent 1988; 1: 27-33.
10. Roulet J-F and Herder S. Keramik als Füllungsmaterial für Seitenzahnkavitäten. Zahnärztl Mitt. 1989; 79: 908-913.
11. Haas M, Arnetzl G, Wegscheider WA, König K and Bratschko RO. Klinische und werkstoffkundliche Erfahrungen mit Komposit-, Keramik und Goldinlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992; 47: 18-22.
12. Jäger K, Henz B, Wirz J and Graber G. Marginale Passgenauigkeit befestigter adhäsiver Keramikinlays. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990; 100: 1304-1309.
13. Sorensen JA, Avera SP and Torres TJ. A comparison of marginal fidelity and microleakage of posterior restorative systems. In: Mörmann HW, ed. International Symposium on Computer Restorations. The State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Proceedings. Berlin: Quintessenz, 1991; pp. 275-284.
14. Molin M and Karlsson S. A clinical evaluation of the Optec inlay system. Acta Odontol Scand 1992; 50: 227-233.
15. Noack MJ, Locke LS and Roulet J-F. Das Randverhalten adhäsiv befestigter und mittels Ultraschall eingesetzter Keramikinlays in vivo. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993; 48: 720-723.
16. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Davidson CL et al. Dual cure luting composites - Part II: Clinically related properties. J Oral Rehabil 1994; 21: 57-66.
17. Krejci I, Krejci D and Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 181-186.
18. Miller RG. Simultaneous Statistical Inference. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 1981.
19. Höglund C, Van Dijken J and Olofsson A-L. A clinical evaluation of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. A 2-year follow up study. Swed Dent J 1992; 16: 169-171.
20. Hickel R. Zur Problematik hypersensibler Zahnhälse nach Eingliederung von Adhäsivinlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990; 45: 740-742.
21. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G et al. Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo. J Dent 1992; 20: 18-26.
22. Krejci I. Zahnfarbene Restaurationen. PhD thesis. Munich: Hanser, 1992.
23. Inokoshi S, Willems G, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Braem M and Vanherle G. Dual cure luting composites - part I: Filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 133-146.
24. Kunzelmann K-H, Deigner M and Hickel R. Dreimedienabrasion von Befestigungskompositen adhäsiver Inlaysysteme. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993; 48: 109-111.
25. Friedl K-H, Schmalz G and Hiller K-A. Flüssigkeitskulturen zur Prüfung zahnärztlicher Werkstoffe auf das Bakterienwachstum. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1992; 47: 826-831.
26. Svanberg M, Mjör IA and Orstavik D. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 861-864.
27. Lambrechts P, Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Braem M and Vanherle G. Classification and potential of composite luting materials. In: Mörmann WH, ed. International Symposium on Computer Restorations. The State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Proceedings. Berlin: Quintessenz, 1991; pp. 61-90.