Lexical access revisited: Evidence from picture-pseudoword interference

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 117-150

  Belke, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 12444301733     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440340000448     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419-439.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Belke, E. (1998). Zum zeitlichen Ablauf lexikalischer Zugriffsprozesse [On the time course of lexical retrieval processes]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Bielefeld, Germany.
4. Belke, E., Eikmeyer, H.-J., & Schade, U. (2001). Freier Zugang: Anmerkungen aus der Sicht de Sprachproduktion [Free access: Comments from the viewpoint of speech production]. In L. Sichelschmidt & H. Strohner (Eds.), Sprache, Sinn und Situation. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitäts- Verlag.
5. Berg, T. (1988). Die Abbildung des Sprachproduktionsprozesses in einem Aktivationsflußodell: Untersuchungen an deutschen und englischen Versprechern [Modelling the speech production process using a spreading-activation approach: Investigations on German and English speech errors] (Linguistische Arbeiten. No. 206). Tübingen. Germany: Niemeyer.
6. Berg, T., & Schade, U. (1992). The role of inhibition in a spreading activation model of language production. Part I: The psycholinguistic perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 405-434.
7. Blanken, G. (1998). Lexicalisation in speech production: Evidence from form-related substitutions in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 321-360.
8. Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Grammatical encoding. In S. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.
9. Boelte, J., & Coenen, E. (2002). Is phonological information mapped onto semantic information in a one-to-one mapping? Brain and Language, 81, 384-397.
10. Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 193-210.
11. Cutting, J. C., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 318-344.
12. Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1998). Is visual lexical access based on phonological codes? Evidence form a picture-word interference task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 91-95.
13. Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 345-361.
14. Dell, G. S. (1985). Positive feedback in hierarchical connectionist models: Applications to language production. Cognitive Science, 9, 3-23.
15. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in language production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
16. Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexical priming: A comment on Levelt et al. (1991). Psychological Review, 98, 604-614.
17. Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611-629.
18. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838.
19. Dressler, W. U. (1976). Tendenzen in kontaminatorischen Fehlleistungen (und ihre Beziehungen zur Sprachgeschichte) [Trends in blends (and their relation to the history of language)]. Die Sprache, 22, 1-10.
20. Fromkin, V. A. (1988). Grammatical aspects of speech errors. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, Vol. II. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Garrett, M. F. (1988). Processes in language production. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, Vol. III. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Grossberg, S., Boardman, I., & Cohen, M. (1997). Neural dynamics of variable-rate speech categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 481-503.
23. Harley, T. A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of language production: Evidence from non-plan internal speech errors. Cognitive Science, 8, 191-219.
24. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1998). Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1256-1274.
25. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Priming effects from phonologically related distractors in picture-word interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 371-382.
26. Leuninger, H. (1993). Reden ist Schweigen, Silber ist Cold: Gesammelte Versprecher [A collection of Speech errors]. Zürich. Switzerland: Ammann Verlag.
27. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
29. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in language production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142.
30. Mannhaupt, H.-R. (1983). Produktionsnormen für verbale Reaktionen zu 40 geläufigen Kategorien [Production norms of verbal reactions to 40 ubiquitous categories]. Sprache und Kognition, 4, 264-268.
31. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 576-585.
32. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1-71.
33. Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.
34. Monsell, S. (1987). On the relation between lexical input and output pathways for speech. In A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.), Language perception and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, reading and writing. London: Academic Press.
35. Morris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
36. Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 539-557.
37. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
38. Rapp, D. N., & Samuel, A. G. (2002). A reason to rhyme: Phonological and semantic influences on lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 564-571.
39. Rayner, K., & Posnansky, C. (1978). Stages of processing in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 64-80.
40. Rayner, K., & Springer, C. J. (1986). Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 207-222.
41. Roelofs, A. (in press). Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review.
42. Schade, U. (1999). Konnektionistische Sprachproduktion [Connectionist language production]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
43. Schriefers, H., & Meyer, A. S. (1990). Experimental note: Cross-modal visual-auditory picture-word interference. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 418-420.
44. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
45. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
46. Starreveld, P. A. (2000). On the interpretation of auditory context effects in word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 497-525.
47. Starreveld, P. A., & LaHeij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 686-698.
48. Starreveld, P. A., & LaHeij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 896-918.
49. Taylor, J. K., & Burke, D. M. (2002). Asymmetric aging effects on semantic and phonological processes: Naming in the picture-word interference task. Psychology and Aging, 17, 662-676.
50. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 9, 325-329.
51. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374-408.