Membrane Binding of Ribosomes Occurs at SecYE-based Sites in the Archaea Haloferax volcanii

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 336, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 997-1010

  Ring, Gabriela ^a   Eichler, Jerry ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Archaea; Halophiles; Protein translocation; Ribosomes; Translocon

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; INORGANIC SALT; RECEPTOR;

ARCHAEBACTERIUM; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CHIMERA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; EUKARYOTE; FLOTATION; HALOFERAX VOLCANII; HALOPHILIC BACTERIUM; MEMBRANE BINDING; MEMBRANE VESICLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEPTOR AFFINITY; RECEPTOR BINDING; RIBOSOME; STEREOSPECIFICITY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; WILD TYPE;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA; HALOFERAX; HALOFERAX VOLCANII;

EID: 1242272089     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Rapoport T.A., Jungnickel B., Kutay U. Protein transport across the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum and bacterial inner membrane. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65:1996;271-303.
2. Johnson A.E., van Waes M.A. The translocon: a dynamic gateway at the ER membrane. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15:1999;799-842.
3. Mori H., Ito K. The Sec protein-translocation pathway. Trends Microbiol. 9:2001;494-500.
4. Driessen A.J., Manting E.H., van der Does C. The structural basis of protein targeting and translocation in bacteria. Nature Struct. Biol. 8:2001;492-498.
5. Pohlschröder M., Prinz W.A., Hartmann E., Beckwith J. Protein translocation in the three domains: variations on a theme. Cell. 91:1997;563-566.
6. Eichler J. Archaeal protein translocation crossing membranes in the third domain of life. Eur. J. Biochem. 267:2000;3402-3412.
7. Eichler J. Archaeal signal peptidases from the genus Thermoplasma: structural and mechanistic hybrids of the bacterial and eukaryal enzymes. J. Mol. Evol. 54:2002;411-415.
8. Zwieb C., Eichler J. Getting on target: the archaeal signal recognition particle. Archaea. 1:2001;27-34.
9. Bardy S.L., Eichler J., Jarrell K.F. Archaeal signal peptides - a comparative survey at the genome level. Protein Sci. 12:2003;1833-1843.
10. Keenan R.J., Freymann D.M., Stroud R.M., Walter P. The signal recognition particle. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70:2001;755-775.
11. Walter P., Blobel G. Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum III. Signal recognition protein (SRP) causes signal sequence-dependent and site-specific arrest of chain elongation that is released by microsomal membranes. J. Cell Biol. 91:1981;557-561.
12. Miller J.D., Wilhelm H., Gierasch L., Gilmore R., Walter P. GTP binding and hydrolysis by the signal recognition particle during initiation of protein translocation. Nature. 366:1993;351-354.
13. Connolly T., Gilmore R. GTP hydrolysis by complexes of the signal recognition particle and the signal recognition particle receptor. J. Cell Biol. 123:1993;799-807.
14. Görlich D., Prehn S., Hartmann E., Kalies K.U., Rapoport T.A. A mammalian homolog of SEC61p and SECYp is associated with ribosomes and nascent polypeptides during translocation. Cell. 71:1992;489-503.
15. Kalies K.U., Görlich D., Rapoport T.A. Binding of ribosomes to the rough endoplasmic reticulum mediated by the Sec61p-complex. J. Cell Biol. 126:1994;925-934.
16. Hansen W., Garcia P.D., Walter P. In vitro protein translocation across the yeast endoplasmic reticulum: ATP-dependent posttranslational translocation of the prepro-alpha-factor. Cell. 45:1986;397-406.
17. Brodsky J.L., Goeckeler J., Schekman R. BiP and Sec63p are required for both co- and posttranslational protein translocation into the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;9643-9646.
18. Bassford P., Beckwith J., Ito K., Kumamoto C., Mizushima S., Oliver D., et al. The primary pathway of protein export in E. coli. Cell. 367:1991;368.
19. Herskovits A.A., Bibi E. Association of Escherichia coli ribosomes with the inner membrane requires the signal recognition particle receptor but is independent of the signal recognition particle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;4621-4626.
20. Prinz A., Behrens C., Rapoport T.A., Hartmann E., Kalies K.U. Evolutionarily conserved binding of ribosomes to the translocation channel via the large ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 19:2000;1900-1906.
21. Zito C.R., Oliver D. Two-stage binding of SecA to the bacterial translocon regulates ribosome-translocon interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2003;40640-40646.
22. Irihimovitch V., Eichler J. Post-translational secretion of fusion proteins in the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2003;12881-12887.
23. Dale H., Angevine C.M., Krebs M.P. Ordered membrane insertion of an archaeal opsin in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;7847-7852.
24. Gropp R., Gropp F., Betlach M.C. Association of the halobacterial 7S RNA to the polysome correlates with expression of the membrane protein bacterioopsin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 89:1992;1204-1208.
25. Rose R.W., Pohlschröder M. In vivo analysis of an essential archaeal signal recognition particle in its native host. J. Bacteriol. 184:2002;3260-3267.
26. Tozik I., Huang Q., Zweib C., Eichler J. Reconstitution of the signal recognition particle of the halophilic archaeaon Haloferax volcanii. Nucl. Acids Res. 30:2002;4166-4175.
27. Bhuiyan S.H., Gowda K., Hotokezaka H., Zwieb C. Assembly of archaeal signal recognition particle from recombinant components. Nucl. Acids Res. 28:2000;1365-1373.
28. Diener J.L., Wilson C. Role of SRP19 in assembly of the Archaeoglobus fulgidus signal recognition particle. Biochemistry. 39:2000;12862-12874.
29. Maeshima H., Okuno E., Aimi T., Morinaga T., Itoh T. An archaeal protein homologous to mammalian SRP54 and bacterial Ffh recognizes a highly conserved region of SRP RNA. FEBS Letters. 507:2001;336-340.
30. Hainzl T., Huang S., Sauer-Eriksson A.E. Structure of the SRP19-RNA complex and implications for signal recognition particle assembly. Nature. 417:2002;767-771.
31. Oubridge C., Kuglstatter A., Jovine L., Nagai K. Crystal structure of SRP19 in complex with the S domain of SRP RNA and its implication for the assembly of the signal recognition particle. Mol. Cell. 9:2002;1251-1261.
32. Christian J.H.B., Waltho J.A. Solute concentrations within cells of halophilic and non-halophilic bacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 65:1962;506-508.
33. Ginzburg M., Sachs L., Ginzburg B.Z. Ion metabolism in a Halobacterium. I. Influence of age of culture on intracellular concentrations. J. Gen. Physiol. 55:1970;187-207.
34. Saruyama H., Nierhaus K. A highly efficient poly(U)-dependent poly (Phe) synthesis system for the extreme halophile archaebacterium Halobacterium halobium. FEBS Letters. 183:1985;390-394.
35. Shevack A., Gewitz H.S., Hennemann B., Yonath A., Wittmann H.G. Characterization and crystallization of ribosomes particles from Halobacterium marismortui. FEBS Letters. 184:1985;68-71.
36. Matheson A.T., Yaguchi M., Christensen P., Rollin C.F., Hasnain S. Purification, properties, and N-terminal amino acid sequence of certain 50 S ribosomal subunit proteins from the archaebacterium Halobacterium cutirubrum. Can. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 62:1984;426-433.
37. Sanchez M.E., Ureña D., Amils R., Londei P. In vitro reassembly of active large ribosomal subunits of the halophilic archaebacterium Haloferax mediterranei. Biochemistry. 29:1990;9256-9261.
38. Sánchez E., Amils R. Absolute requirement of ammonium sulfate for reconstitution of active 70 S ribosomes from the extreme halophilic archaeon Haloferax mediterranei. Eur. J. Biochem. 233:1995;809-814.
39. Ring G., Eichler J. Large-scale preparation and characterization of inverted membrane vesicles from the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii. J. Membr. Biol. 183:2001;195-204.
40. Sumper M., Berg E., Mengele R., Strobel I. Primary structure and glycosylation of the S-layer protein of Haloferax volcanii. J. Bacteriol. 172:1990;7111-7118.
41. Eichler J. Novel glycoproteins of the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii. Arch. Microbiol. 173:2000;445-448.
42. Beckmann R., Bubeck D., Grassucci R., Penczek P., Verschoor A., Blobel G., Frank J. Alignment of conduits for the nascent polypeptide chain in the ribosome-Sec61 complex. Science. 278:1997;2123-2126.
43. Irihimovitch V., Ring G., Elkayam T., Konrad Z., Eichler J. Isolation of fusion proteins containing SecY and SecE components of the protein translocation complex from the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii. Extremophiles. 7:2003;71-77.
44. Hochstein L.I. The membrane-bound enzymes of the archaea. Kates M., Kushner D.J., Matheson A.T. The Biochemisty of Archaea (Archaebacteria). 1993;297-323 Elsevier, New York, NY.
45. Kihara A., Akiyama Y., Ito K. FtsH is required for proteolytic elimination of uncomplexed forms of SecY, an essential protein translocase subunit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;4532-4536.
46. Kinch L.N., Saier M.H. Jr, Grishin N.V. Sec61beta - a component of the archaeal protein secretory system. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27:2002;170-171.
47. Yu Y.H., Sabatini D.D., Kreibich G. Antiribophorin antibodies inhibit the targeting to the ER membrane of ribosomes containing nascent secretory polypeptides. J. Cell Biol. 111:1990;1335-1342.
48. Ichimura T., Shindo Y., Uda Y., Ohsumi T., Omata S., Sugano H. Anti-(p34 protein) antibodies inhibit ribosome binding to and protein translocation across the rough microsomal membrane. FEBS Letters. 326:1993;241-245.
49. Breyton C., Haase W., Rapoport T.A., Kuhlbrandt W., Collinson I. Three-dimensional structure of the bacterial protein-translocation complex SecYEG. Nature. 418:2002;662-665.
50. Tormo J., Lamed R., Chirino A.J., Morag E., Bayer E.A., Shoham Y., Steitz T.A. Crystal structure of a bacterial family-III cellulose-binding domain: a general mechanism for attachment to cellulose. EMBO J. 15:1996;5739-5751.
51. Adelman M.R., Sabatini D.D., Blobel G. Ribosome-membrane interaction. Nondestructive disassembly of rat liver rough microsomes into ribosomal and membranous components. J. Cell Biol. 56:1973;206-229.
52. Jungnickel B., Rapoport T.A. A posttargeting signal sequence recognition event in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Cell. 82:1995;261-270.
53. Borgese N., Mok W., Kreibich G., Sabatini D.D. Ribosomal-membrane interaction: in vitro binding of ribosomes to microsomal membranes. J. Mol. Biol. 88:1974;559-580.
54. Crowley K.S., Reinhart G.D., Johnson A.E. The signal sequence moves through a ribosomal tunnel into a noncytoplasmic aqueous environment at the ER membrane early in translocation. Cell. 73:1993;1101-1115.
55. Crowley K.S., Liao S., Worrell V.E., Reinhart G.D., Johnson A.E. Secretory proteins move through the endoplasmic reticulum membrane via an aqueous, gated pore. Cell. 78:1994;461-471.
56. Menetret J.F., Neuhof A., Morgan D.G., Plath K., Radermacher M., Rapoport T.A., Akey C.W. The structure of ribosome-channel complexes engaged in protein translocation. Mol. Cell. 6:2000;1219-1232.
57. Beckmann R., Spahn C.M., Eswar N., Helmers J., Penczek P.A., Sali A., et al. Architecture of the protein-conducting channel associated with the translating 80S ribosome. Cell. 107:2001;361-372.
58. Morgan D.G., Menetret J.F., Neuhof A., Rapoport T.A., Akey C.W. Structure of the mammalian ribosome-channel complex at 17 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 324:2002;871-886.
59. Ban N., Nissen P., Hansen J., Moore P.B., Steitz T.A. The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 Å resolution. Science. 289:2000;905-920.
60. Madern D., Ebel C., Zaccai G. Halophilic adaptation of enzymes. Extremophiles. 4:2000;91-98.
61. Raden D., Song W., Gilmore R. Role of the cytoplasmic segments of Sec61alpha in the ribosome-binding and translocation-promoting activities of the Sec61 complex. J. Cell Biol. 150:2000;53-64.
62. Levy R., Wiedmann M., Kreibich G. In vitro binding of ribosomes to the beta subunit of the Sec61p protein translocation complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;2340-2346.
63. Savitz A.J., Meyer D.I. Identification of a ribosome receptor in the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Nature. 346:1990;540-544.
64. Tazawa S., Unuma M., Tondokoro N., Asano Y., Ohsumi T., Ichimura T., Sugano H. Identification of a membrane protein responsible for ribosome binding in rough microsomal membranes. J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 109:1991;89-98.
65. Mandon E.C., Jiang Y., Gilmore R. Dual recognition of the ribosome and the signal recognition particle by the SRP receptor during protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 162:2003;575-585.
66. Eichler J., Moll R. The signal recognition particle of archaea. Trends Microbiol. 9:2001;130-136.
67. Koch H.G., Moser M., Müller M. Signal recognition particle-dependent protein targeting, universal to all kingdoms of life. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 146:2003;55-94.
68. Gropp R., Oesterhelt D. In vitro translation of halobacterial mRNA. FEBS Letters. 259:1989;5-9.
69. Condo I., Ciammaruconi A., Benelli D., Ruggero D., Londei P. Cis-acting signals controlling translational initiation in the thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Mol. Microbiol. 34:1999;377-384.
70. Economou A., Wickner W. SecA promotes preprotein translocation by undergoing ATP-driven cycles of membrane insertion and deinsertion. Cell. 78:1994;835-843.
71. Juzumiene D., Shapkina T., Kirillov S., Wollenzien P. Short-range RNA-RNA crosslinking methods to determine rRNA structure and interactions. Methods. 25:2001;333-343.
72. Dyall-Smith M. The Halohandbook: Protocols for Halobacterial Genetics. Version 4.5. 2001;. (http://www.microbiol.unimelb.edu.au/micro/staff/mds/ resources.html).