Sensory perception of cured-smoked pork loin from carriers and noncarriers of the RN- allele and its relationship with technological meat quality

Journal of Muscle Foods

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 54-76

  Hullberg, Anja ^a   Johansson, Lisbeth ^b   Lundström, Kerstin ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 12344264931     PISSN: 10460756     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4573.2004.06103.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. AASLYNG, M.D., BEJERHOLM, C., ERTBJERG, P., BERTRAM, H.C. and ANDERSEN, H.J. 2003. Cooking loss and juiciness of pork in relation to raw meat quality and cooking procedure. Food. Qual. Prefer. 14, 277-288.
2. ANDERSEN, H.J. 2000. What is pork quality? In Quality of Meat and Fat in Pigs as Effected by Genetics and Nutrition (EAAP Publication No. 100). (C. Wenk, J.A. Fernández and M. Dupuis, eds.) pp. 15-26, Wagningen Pers, Zurich, Switzerland.
3. BARTON-GADE, P.A., DEMEYER, D., HONIKEL, K.O., JOSEPH, R.L., POULANNE, E., SEVERINI, M., SMULDERS, F.J.M. and TORNBERG, E. 1994. Final version of reference methods for water holding capacity in meat and meat products: Procedures recommended by an OECD working group. In Proceedings of the 40th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, (p. S-V.05), The Hague, Netherlands.
4. BLANCHARD, P.J., WILLIS, M.B., WARKUP, C.C. and ELLIS, M. 2000. The influence of carcass backfat and intramuscular fat level on pork eating quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80, 145-151.
5. BREWER, M.S., JENSEN, J., SOSNICKI, A.A., FIELDS, B., WILSON, E. and MCKEITH, F.K. 2002. The effect of pig genetics on palatability, color and physical characteristics of fresh pork loin chops. Meat Sci. 61, 249-256.
6. EBER, M. and MÜLLER, W.D. 1999. Studies on the suitability of Hampshire-type meat for processing cooked ham. Fleischwirtschaft Int. 7, 19-22.
7. EIKELENBOOM, G., HOVING-BOLINK, A.H. and VAN DER WAL, P.G. 1996a. Die Verzehrsqualität von Schweinefleisch. 1. Einfluß des End-Ph-Wertes. Fleischwirtschaft. 76, 405-406.
8. EIKELENBOOM, G., HOVING-BOLINK, A.H. and VAN DER WAL, P.G. 1996b. Die Verzehrsqualität von Schweinefleisch. 2. Einfluß des Intramuskulären Fettes. Fleischwirtschaft. 76, 559-560.
9. - gene on ultrastructure and protein fractions in pig muscle. Meat Sci. 55, 313-319.
10. GÖRANSSON, Å., VON SETH, G. and TORNBERG, E. 1992. Influence of intramuscular fat content on the eating quality of pork. In Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, pp. 245-248, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
11. HAMILTON, D.N., ELLIS, M., MILLER, K.D., MCKEITH, F.K. and PARRETT, D.F. 2000. The effect of the Halothane and Rendement Napole genes on carcass and meat quality characteristics of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 78, 2862-2867.
12. - Allele on Production Yield of Wann Smoked Ham. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Erasmus project Publication 118.
13. HONIKEL, K.O. 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 49, 447-457.
14. HUFF-LONERGAN, E., BAAS, T.J., MALEK, M., DEKKERS, J.C.M., PRUSA, K. and ROTHSCHILD, M.F. 2002. Correlations among selected pork quality traits. J. Anim. Sci. 80, 617-627.
15. - gene. Meat Sci. 65, 1231-1236.
16. HULLBERG, A. and LUNDSTRÖM, K. 2004. The effects of RN genotype and tumbling condition on processing yield in cured-smoked pork loins. Meat Sci. 67, 409-419.
17. ISO. 1983. Sensory Analysis-Methodology-Paired Comparison. Ref. no. ISO. 5495:1983. (E). ISO, Geneva.
18. ISO. 1985. Sensory Analysis-Methodology-Flavour Profile Methods. Ref. no. ISO. 6564:1985. ISO, Geneva.
19. ISO. 1988. Sensory Analysis-General Guidance for the Design of Test Rooms. Ref. no. ISO 8598:1988 (E). ISO, Geneva.
20. ISO. 1993. Sensory Analysis-General Guidance for Selection, Training and Monitoring of Assessors. Ref. no. ISO 8586-1:1993 (E). ISO, Geneva.
21. - allele in Hampshire crosses with low and high lean meat content. In Proceedings 44th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, pp. 916-917, Barcelona, Spain.
22. - allele. Food. Qual. Prefer. 10, 299-303.
23. JONSÄLL, A., JOHANSSON, L. and LUNDSTRÖM, K. 2000. Effects of red clover silage and RN genotype on sensory quality of prolonged frozen stored pork (M. Longissimus dorsi). Food. Qual. Prefer. 11, 371-376.
24. JONSÄLL, A., JOHANSSON, L., LUNDSTRÖM, K., ANDERSSON, K.H., NILSEN, A.N. and RISVIK, E. 2002. Effects of genotype and rearing system on sensory characteristics and preference for pork (M. Longissimus dorsi). Food. Qual. Prefer. 13, 73-80.
25. - allele on pork tenderness. Meat Sci. 64, 341-350.
26. JOSELL, Å., VON SETH, G. and TORNBERG, E. 1998. The quality of drycured-smoked ham from different pig cross-breeds and RN-genotypes. In Proceedings 44th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, pp. 914-915, Barcelona, Spain.
27. JOSELL, Å., VON SETH, G. and TORNBERG, E. 2003b. Sensory quality and the incidence of PSE of pork in relation to crossbreed and RN phenotype. Meat Sci. 65, 651-660.
28. LE ROY, P., ELSEN, J.M., CARITEZ, J.C., TALMANT, A., JUIN, H., SELLIER, P. and MONIN, G. 2000. Comparison between the three porcine RN genotypes for growth, carcass composition and meat quality traits. Genet. Sel. Evol. 32, 165-186.
29. LE ROY, P., NAVEAU, J., ELSEN, J.M. and SELLIER, P. 1990. Evidence for a new major gene influencing meat quality in pigs. Genet. Res. 55, 33-40.
30. LINDAHL, G., ENFÄLT, A.C., VON SETH, G., JOSELL, Å., HEDEBRO-VELANDER, I., ANDERSEN, H.J., BRAUNSCHWEIG, M., ANDERSSON, L. and LUNDSTRÖM, K. 2003. A second mutant allele (V1991) at the PRKAG3 (RN) locus-II. Effect on colour characteristics of pork loin. Meat Sci. 66, 621-627.
31. LINDAHL, G., LUNDSTRÖM, K. and TORNBERG, E. 2001. Contribution of pigment content, myoglobin forms and internal reflectance to the colour of pork loin and ham from pure breed pigs. Meat Sci. 59, 141-151.
32. LUNDSTRÒM, K., ANDERSSON, A. and HANSSON, I. 1996. Effect of the RN gene on technological and sensory meat quality in crossbred pigs with Hampshire as terminal sire. Meat Sci. 42, 145-153.
33. LUNDSTRÖM, K. and ENFÄLT, A.C. 1997. Rapid prediction of RN phenotype in pigs by means of meat juice. Meat Sci. 45, 127-131.
34. - allele in Hampshire crosses and in purebred Yorkshire pigs. Meat Sci. 48, 115-124.
35. MARTENS, H. and MARTENS, M. 2000. Modified Jack-knife estimation of parameter uncertainty in bilinear modelling by partial least squares regression (PLSR). Food. Qual. Prefer. 11, 5-16.
36. MILAN, D., JEON, J.T., LOOFT, C., AMARGER, V., ROBIC, A., THE-LANDER, M., ROGEL-GAILLARD, C., et al. 2000. A mutation in PRKAG3 associated with excess glycogen content in pig skeletal muscle. Science. 288, 1248-1251.
37. MOELICH, E.I., HOFFMAN, L.C. and CONRADIE, P.J. 2003. Sensory and functional meat quality characteristics of pork derived from three halothane genotypes. Meat Sci. 63, 333-338.
38. - gene on fresh and processed pork. In Composition of Meat in Relation to Processing, Nutritional and Sensory Quality - from Farm to Fork (K. Lundström, I. Hansson and E. Wiklund, eds.) pp. 57-67, ECCEAMST, Utrecht.
39. - gene on some traits of muscle and liver in pigs. In Proceedings 38th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, pp. 391-394, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
40. MONIN, G. and SELLIER, P. 1985. Pork of low technological quality with a normal rate of muscle pH fall in the immediate post-mortem period: The case of the Hampshire breed. Meat Sci. 13, 49-63.
41. NÆS, T. 1998. Detecting individual differences among assessors and differences among replicates in sensory profiling. Food. Qual. Prefer. 9, 107-110.
42. NAVEAU, J. 1986. Contribution a l'étude du déterminisme génétique de la qualité de viande porcine. Héritabilité du Rendement Technologique NAPOLE. Journées Rech. Porcine En France. 18, 265-276.
43. OLSSON, V., ANDERSSON, K., HANSSON, I. and LUNDSTRÖM, K. 2003. Differences in meat quality between organically and conventionally produced pigs. Meat Sci. 64, 287-297.
44. OTREMBA, M.M., DIKEMAN, M.E., MILLIKEN, G.A., STRODA, S.L., UNRUH, J.A., CHAMBERS, I.V. and E. 1999. Interrelationship among evaluations of beef longissimus and semitendinosus muscle tenderness by Warner-Bratzler shear force, a descriptive-texture profile sensory panel, and a descriptive attribute sensory panel. J. Anim. Sci. 77, 865-873.
45. POSTE, L.M., BUTLER, G., MACKIE, D., AGAR, V.E. and THOMPSON, B.K. 1993. Correlations of sensory and instrumental meat tenderness values as affected by sampling techniques. Food. Qual. Prefer. 4, 207-214.
46. RISVIK, E. 1994. Sensory properties and preferences. Meat Sci. 36, 67-77.
47. ROESSLER, E.B., PANGBORN, R.M., SIDEL, J.L. and STONE, H. 1978. Expanded statistical tables for estimating significance in paired-preference, paired-difference, duo-trio and triangle tests. J. Food Sci. 43(940-943), 947.
48. SCHMIDT, G.R. 1984. Processing effects on meat product microstructure. Food Microstruct. 3, 33-39.
49. STUMPE, A., SCHMITTEN, F. and SCHEPERS, K.H. 1990. Zusammenhänge zwischen sensorischen und technologischen Qualitätseigen-schaften des Schweinefleisches. Fleischwirtschaft. 70, 195-199.
50. TORNBERG, E., FJELKNER-MODIG, S., RUDERUS, H., GLANTZ, P.O., RANDOW, K. and STAFFORD, D. 1985. Clinically recorded masticatory patterns as related to the sensory evaluation of meat and meat products. J. Food Sci. 50, 1059-1066.