New circumscription of the tribe Limoselleae (Scrophulariaceae) that includes the taxa of the tribe Manuleeae

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 146, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 453-467

  Kornhall, Per ^a   Bremer, Birgitta ^a,b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b ROYAL SWEDISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Chaenostoma; Hybridization; ITS; Jamesbrittenia; Limosella; ndhF; Parsimony; Sutera; trnT F

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS;

JAMESBRITTENIA; LIMOSELLA; LIMOSELLEAE; SCROPHULARIACEAE; SUTERA;

EID: 11144313182     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00341.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andreasen K, Baldwin BG, Bremer B. 1999. Phylogenetic utility of the nuclear rDNA ITS region in subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae): comparisons with cpDNA rbcL sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 217: 119-135.
2. Andreasen K, Bremer B. 2000. Combined phylogenetic analysis in the Rubiaceae-Ixoroideae: Morphology, nuclear and chloroplast DNA data. American Journal of Botany 87: 1731-1748.
3. Archibald JK, Mort ME, Crawford DJ. 2003. Bayesian inference of phylogeny: a non-technical primer. Taxon 52: 187-191.
4. Baldwin BG. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 3-16.
5. Baldwin BG, Sandersson MJ, Potter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
6. Bentham G. 1846. Ordo CXLII Scrophulariaceae. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis. A. d. Candolle. Paris: Victoris Masson.
7. Bremer B, Bremer K, Heidari N, Erixon P, Olmstead RG, Anderberg AA, Kallersjo M, Barkhordarian E. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: 274-301.
8. Darwin C. 1872. The origin of species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray.
9. Dumortier B-C. 1827. Florula Belgica. Tourna: J. Casterman.
10. Farris SF, Albert VA, K̈allersjö M, Lipscomb D, Kluge AG. 1996. Parsimony jacknife outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12: 99-124.
11. Gene Codes Corporation. 1991. Sequencher Ver. 3.1.1. Ann Arbor, Michigan, Gene Codes Corporation.
12. Gleason HA, Cronquist A. 1964. The natural geography of plants. New York & London: Columbia University Press.
13. Glück H. 1934. Limosella-Studien. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik und Pflanzengeographhie 66: 488-566.
14. Hallier H. 1903. Ueber die Abgrenzung und Vervandtschaft der einzelnen Sippen. Bulletin de L'herbier Boissier 2: 181-207.
15. Hilliard O. 1994. The Manuleae - a tribe of Scrophulariaceae. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
16. Hilliard OM. 1999. The tribe Selagineae (Scrophulariaceae). Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh.
17. Horaninov P. 1847. Characteres essentiales familiarum ac tribuum Regni Vegetabilis et Amphorganici. St Petersburg: K. Wienhöberianis, Petropoli.
18. Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Miller RE, Ronquist F. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Systematic Biology 51: 673-688.
19. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: A program for the Bayesian inference of phylogeny, Distributed by the author.
20. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2001. Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny and Its Impact on Evolutionary Biology. Science 294: 2310-2314.
21. Källersjö M, Albert VA, Farris JS. 1999. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15: 91-93.
22. Kårehed J. 2002. Evolutionary studies in asterids emphasising Euasterids II. Thesis Uppsala: Faculty of Science and Technology, Uppsala University.
23. Kauff F, Lutzoni F. 2002. Phylogeny of the Gyalectales and Ostropales (Ascomycota, Fungi): among and within order relationships based on nuclear ribosomal RNA small and large subunits. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 138-156.
24. Kornhall P, Heidari N, Bremer B. 2001. Selagineae and Manuleeae, two tribes or one? Phylogenetic studies in the Scrophulariaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 228: 199-218.
25. Larget B, Simon DL. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 750-759.
26. Leache AD, Reeder TW. 2002. Molecular systematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Systematic Biology 51: 44-68.
27. Olmstead RG, DePamphilis CW, Wolfe AD, Young ND, Elisons WJ, Reeves PA. 2001. Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae. American Journal of Botany 88: 348-361.
28. Oxelman B, Backlund M, Bremer B. 1999. Relationships of the Buddlejaceae s. 1. investigated using parsimony jackknife and branch support analysis of chloroplast ndhF and rbcL sequence data. Systematic Botany 24: 164-182.
29. Oxelman B, Lidén M. 1995. Generic boundaries in the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae) as inferred from nuclear rDNA sequences. Taxon 44: 525-542.
30. Popp M, Oxelman B. 2001. Inferring the history of the polyploid Silene aegaea (Caryophyllaceae) using plastid and homoeologous nuclear DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20: 474-481.
31. Rambaut A. 1995. Se-Al, sequence alignment program. Oxford: Department of Zoology, University of Oxford.
32. Rannala B. 2002. Identifiability of parameters in MCMC Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Systematic Biology 51: 754-760.
33. Ridley HN. 1930. The dispersal of plants throughout the world. Ashford, Kent: L. Reeve Ltd.
34. Rydin C, Kallersjo M. 2002. Taxon sampling and seed plant phylogeny. Cladistics 18: 485-513.
35. Schneider H, Smith AR, Cranfill R, Haufler CH, Ranker TA, Hildebrand T. 2002. Gymnogrammitis dareiformis is a polygrammoid fern (Polypodiaceae) - Resolving an apparent conflict between morphological and molecular data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 234: 121-136.
36. Sennblad B, Bremer B. 2000. Is there a justification for differential a priori weighting in coding sequences? A case study from rbcl and Apocynaceae s.l. Systematic Biology 49: 101-113.
37. Suzuki Y, Glazko GV, Nei M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 16138-16143.
38. Swofford DL. 1999. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
39. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2003. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
40. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 315-322.
41. Wilcox TP, Zwickl DJ, Heath TA, Hillis DM. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 361-371.
42. Zanis MJ, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Mathews S, Donoghue MJ. 2002. The root of the angiosperms revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 6848-6853.
43. Zimmer EA, Roalson EH, Skog LE, Boggan JK, Idnurm A. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the Gesnerioideae (Gesneriaceae) based on nrDNA and cpDNA trnL-F and trnE-T spacer region sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 296-311.