Bayesian inference of phylogeny: A non-technical primer

Taxon

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 187-191

  Archibald, Jenny K ^a   Mort, Mark E ^b   Crawford, Daniel J ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHYLOGENY;

EID: 0038108640     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3647388     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Alfaro, M. E., Zoller, S. & Lutzoni, F. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molec. Biol. Evol. 20: 255-266.
2. Bollback, J. P. 2002. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. Molec. Biol. Evol. 19: 1171-1180.
3. Buckley, T. R. 2002. Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topolopy: evidence from empirical data sets. Syst. Biol. 51: 509-523.
4. Douady, C. J., Delsuc, F., Boucher, Y., Doolittle, W. F. & Douzery, E. J. P. 2003. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Molec. Biol. Evol. 20: 248-254.
5. Faith, D. P. 1985. Distance methods and the approximation of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 34: 312-325.
6. Farris, J. S. 1999. Likelihood and inconsistency. Cladistics 15: 199-204.
7. Farris, J. S., Albert, V. A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D. & Kluge, A. G. 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12: 99-124.
8. Felsenstein, J. 1968. Statistical Inference and the Estimation of Phylogenies. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Chicago, Chicago.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27: 401-410.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogeny: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
11. Green, P. J. 1995. Reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82: 711-732.
12. Hall, B. G. 2001. Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy. A How-To Manual for Molecular Biologists. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
13. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1995. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44: 17-48.
14. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Hillis, D. M. 1993. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 42: 247-264.
15. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Larget, B., Miller, R. E. & Ronquist, E 2002. Potential application and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51: 673-688.
16. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
17. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R. & Bollback, J. P. 2001. Bayesian influence of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294: 2310-2314.
18. Kimball, R. T., Crawford, D. J. & Smith, E. B. 2003. Evolutionary processes in the genus Coreocarpus: insights from molecular phylogenetics. Evolution 57: 52-61.
19. Kunhner, M. K. & Felsenstein, J. 1994. A simulation comparison of phylogeny - algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Molec. Biol. Evol. 11: 459-468.
20. Lewis, P. O. 1998. Maximum likelihood as an alternative to parsimony for inferring phylogeny using nucleotide sequence data. Pp. 132-163 in: Solits, D. E., Soltis, P. S. & Doyle, J. J. (eds.), Molecular Systematics of Plants II. Kluwer, Boston.
21. Lewis, P. O. 2001. Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 30-37.
22. Li, S. 1996. Phylogenetic Tree Construction Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State Univ., Columbus.
23. Mau, B. 1996. Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference via Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Wisconsin, Madison.
24. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth. N., Teller, A. H. & Teller, E. 1953. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21: 1087-1091.
25. Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. 1998. Modeltest, testing the models of substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
26. Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Molec. Evol. 43: 304-311.
27. Reed, D. L., Carpenter, K. E. & deGravelle, M. J. 2002. Molecular systematics of the jacks (Perciformes: Carangidae) based on mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences using parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Molec. Phyl. Evol. 23: 513-524.
28. Rydin, C. & Källersjö, M. 2002. Taxon sampling and seed plant phylogeny. Cladistics 18: 485-513.
29. Siddall, M. E. 1998. Success of parsimony in the four-taxon case: long-branch repulsion by likelihood in the Farris Zone. Cladistics 14: 209-220.
30. Simon, D. & Larget, B. 1998. Bayesian Analysis in Molecular Biology and Evolution (BAMBE), version 1.01 beta. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Duquesne Univ., Pittsburgh.
31. Steel, M. & Penny, D. 2000. Parsimony, likelihood, and the role of models in molecular phylogenetics. Molec. Biol. Evol. 17: 839-850.
32. Suzuki, Y., Glazko, G. V. & Nei, M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 99: 16138-16143.
33. Swofford, D. & Olsen, G. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction. Pp. 411-501 in: Hills, D. & Moritz, C. (eds.), Molecular Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
34. Wilcox, T. P., Zwickl, D. J., Heath, T. A. & Hillis, D. M. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of the Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Molec. Phyl. Evol. 25: 361-371.