Examining the Interactivity of Lexical Orthographic and Phonological Processing

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 290-303

  Owen, William J ^a   Borowsky, Ron ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348218233     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087432     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition across orthographies: On the interaction between context and degradation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 272-276.
2. Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 813-840.
3. Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 63-85.
4. Borowsky, R., Owen, W. J., & Fonos, N. (1999). Reading speech and hearing print: Constraining models of visual word recognition by exploring connections with speech perception. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 294-305.
5. Borowsky, R., Owen, W. J., & Masson, M. E. J. (2002). Evaluating the diagnostics for phonological lexical access: Pseudohomophone naming advantages, disadvantages, and base-word frequency effects. Memory & Cognition, 30, 969-987.
6. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Zeigler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascade model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
7. Fowler, C. A., & Deckle, D. J. (1991). Listening with eye and hand: Cross-modal contributions to speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 816-826.
8. Frost, R., & Katz, L. (1989). Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 17, 302-310.
9. Harm M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insight from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
10. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Zeigler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1996). Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA): An introduction. Aphasiology, 10, 159-180.
12. Liberman, A., & Mattingly, I. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
13. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 1, 476-490.
14. MacDonald, J., & McGurk, H. (1978). Visual influences on speech perception processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 253-257.
15. Massaro, D. W. (1989), Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 398-421.
16. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1993). The paradigm and the fuzzy logical model of perception are alive and well. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 115-124.
17. Massaro, D. W., Cohen, M. M., & Thompson, L. (1988). Visual language in speech perception: Lipreading and reading. Visual Language, 22, 8-31.
18. Masson, M. E. J., & Borowsky, R. (1998). More than meets the eye: Context effects in word identification. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1245-1269.
19. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
20. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
21. Paap, K. R., Johansen, L. S., Chun, E., & Vonnahme, P. (2000). Neighborhood frequency does affect performance in the Reicher task: Encoding or decision? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1691-1720.
22. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
23. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1997). A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review, 104, 319-343.
24. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
25. Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1140-1154.
26. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1131-1161.