Reading speech and hearing print: Constraining models of visual word recognition by exploring connections with speech perception

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 294-305

  Borowsky, Ron ^a   Owen, William J ^b   Fonos, Nikki ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HEARING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; READING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISION;

COGNITION; HEARING; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHONETICS; READING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0033255740     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087317     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8, 493-512.
2. Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. S., & Seergobin, K. (1990). On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review, 97, 432-446.
3. Borowsky, R., Fonos, N., & Owen, W. J. (1998, June). On the modularity of orthographic and phonological perception. Paper presented at the 8th annual meeting of the Canadian Society of Brain, Behavior, and Cognitive Science, Ottawa, Canada.
4. Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 63-85.
5. Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1999). Frequency effects and lexical access: On the interpretation of null pseudohomophone base-word frequency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 270-275.
6. Borowsky, R., McDougall, P., MacKinnon, G. E., & Hymel, S. (1999). On the diagnosis of surface and phonological dyslexias: Measuring reliance on sight vocabulary and phonetic decoding during real word recognition. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7. Broadbent, D. (1985). A question of levels: Comment on McClelland and Rumelhart. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 189-192.
8. Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149-180.
9. Chomsky, N. (1997). Language and mind. Princeton University Lecture (transcript).
10. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading: Dual route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 598-608.
11. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). London: Academic Press.
12. Eccles, J. C. (1964). The physiology of synapses. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13. Farah, M. (1989). Semantic and perceptual priming: How similar are the underlying mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 188-194
14. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Fowler, C. A., & Dekle, D. J. (1991). Listening with eye and hand: Cross-modal contributions to speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 816-828.
16. Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone prim es. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218-233.
17. Hubel, D. H. (1982). Exploration of the primary visual cortex, 1955-1978. Nature, 299, 515-524.
18. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 148, 574-591.
19. Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: The MacMillian Company.
20. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1996). Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA): An introduction. Aphasiology, 10, 159-180.
22. Liberman, A., & Mattingly, I. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
23. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
24. Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Peterson, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157-195.
25. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
26. Massaro, D., Cohen, M., & Thompson, L. (1988). Visual language in speech perception: Lipreading and reading. Visual Language, 22, 8-31.
27. Massaro, D. W., & Stork, D. G. (1998). Speech recognition and sensory integration. American Scientist, 86, 236-244.
28. Masson, M. E. J., & Borowsky, R. (1998). More than meets the eye: Context effects in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1245-1269.
29. McCarthy, R., & Warrington, E. K. (1986). Phonological reading: Phenomena and paradoxes. Cortex, 22, 359-380.
30. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
31. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
32. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 159-188.
33. McCloskey, M. (1991) Networks and theories: The place of connectionism in cognitive science. Psychological Science, 2, 387-395.
34. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
35. Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 221-243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
37. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1997). A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review, 104, 319-343.
38. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1985). Levels indeed! A response to Broadbent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 193-197.
39. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
40. Seidenberg, M. S., Peterson, A., MacDonald, M. C., & Plaut, D. C. (1996). Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 48-62.
41. Sherrington, C. S. (1906). The integrative action of the nervous system. New York: Scriber's (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1947.
42. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
43. Ziegler, J. C., Van Orden, G. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 845-860.
44. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1131-1161.