Lexical access codes in visual word recognition: Are the joint effects of context and stimulus quality diagnostic?

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 196-207

  Borowsky, Ron ^a   Besner, Derek ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; RECALL; VISION;

HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; PHONETICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0034265201     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087341     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allport, D. A. (1979). Word recognition in reading: A tutorial review. In P. A. Kolers, H. Bouma, & M. Wrolstad (Eds.), Processing of visible language (Vol.1), (pp. 227-257). New York: Plenum Press.
2. Bajo, M. T., Burton, A., Burton, E., & Cañas, J. J. (1994). Word recognition across orthographies: Another look at the interaction between context and degradation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 171-193.
3. Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1991). Strategic use of lexical and nonlexical routines in visual word recognition: Evidence from oral reading in Persian. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 644-652.
4. Becker, C. A., & Killion, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 389-401.
5. Besner, D., Davies, J., & Daniels, S. (1981). Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 415-437.
6. Besner, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1987). Orthographic and phonological codes in the oral reading of Japanese Kana. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 335-343.
7. Besner, D., & Smith, M. C. (1992a). Visual word recognition: Is the Orthographic Depth Hypothesis sinking? In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. Amsterdam: North Holland.
8. Besner, D., & Smith, M. C. (1992b). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 468-482.
9. Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition across orthographies: On the interaction between context and degradation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 272-276.
10. Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 813-840.
11. Bridgeman, B. (1987). Is the dual route theory possible in phonetically regular languages? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 331-332.
12. Buchanan, L., & Besner, D. (1993). Reading aloud: Evidence for the use of a whole word nonsemantic pathway. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 133-152.
13. Carello, C., Lukatela, G., Peter, M., & Turvey, M. T. (1995). Effects of association, frequency, and stimulus quality on naming words in the presence or absence of pseudowords. Memory & Cognition, 23, 289-300.
14. Carello, C., Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Lexical involvement in naming does not contravene prelexical phonology: Comment on Sebastian-Galles (1991). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 192-198.
15. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). New York: Academic Press.
16. Coltheart, M., & Coltheart, V. (1997). Reading comprehension is not exclusively reliant upon phonological representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 167-175.
17. Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
18. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Marmurek, H. H. C. (1999). Semantic priming in fully recurrent network models of lexical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 758-775.
19. Feldman, L. B., & Turvey, M. T. (1983). Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 288-298.
20. Frost, R. (1998). Towards a strong phonological theory of reading: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
21. Frost, R., & Katz, L. (1992). Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. Amsterdam: North Holland.
22. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104-115.
23. Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan.
24. Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (1981). Orthographic variations and visual information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 377-414.
25. Jared, D., Levy, B. A., & Rayner, K. (1999). The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: Evidence from proofreading and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 219-264.
26. Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 687-715.
27. Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 157-166.
28. Lee, Y., Binder, K.S., Kim, J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Activation of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 948-964.
29. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1987). Loci of phonological effects in the lexical access of words written in a shallow orthography. Psychological Research, 49, 139-146.
30. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
31. Masson, M. E. J. (1999). Semantic priming in a recurrent network: Comment on Dalrymple-Alford and Marmurek (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 777-794.
32. McCann, R. S., & Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 14-24.
33. McCann, R. S., Besner, D., & Davelaar, E. (1988). Word recognition and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 693-706.
34. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: a framework for analyzing processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
35. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
36. Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp.98-118). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Miller, J. (1988). Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: Theoretical distinctions and empirical results. Acta Psychologia, 67, 191-257.
38. Morton, J., & Sasanuma, S. (1984). Lexical access in Japanese. In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology and linguistics (pp. 25-56). London: Erlbaum.
39. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Patterson, K., & Coltheart, V. (1987). Phonological processing in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), The psychology of reading: Attention and performance XII. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: London, England.
41. Plourde, C., & Besner, D. (1997). On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 181-194.
42. Rastle, K, & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 482-503.
43. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., & Binder, K. S. (1998). Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 476-497.
44. Roberts, S., & Sternberg, S. (1992). The meaning of additive reaction time effects: Tests of three alternatives. In D.E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
45. Sasanuma, S. (1980). Acquired dyslexia in Japanese: Clinical features and underlying mechanisms. In M. Coltheart, K. E. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 48-90). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
46. Sebastian-Galles, N. (1991). Reading by analogy in a shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 471-477.
47. Sebastian-Galles, N. (1994). Phonological, orthographic, and lexical codes: Comment on Carello et al. (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 199-202.
48. Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of information and utilization in visual word recognition. In D. Besner, T.G. Waller, & G.E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading Research, Volume 5. Academic Press: Orlando, FL.
49. Seidenberg, M. S. (1992). Beyond orthographic depth in reading: Equitable division of labor. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. Amsterdam: North Holland.
50. Sternberg, D. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II Amsterdam: North-Holland.
51. Sternberg, S. (1998). Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science, Volume 4. Methods, models and conceptual issues (pp. 703-863). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Stolz, J. A., & Neely, J. H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 596-611.
53. Tabossi, P., & Laghi, L. (1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English. Memory & Cognition, 20, 303-313.
54. Taft, M. (1982). An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules? Memory & Cognition, 10, 465-474.
55. Turvey, M. T., Feldman, L. B., & Lukatela, G. (1984). The Serbo-Croatian orthography constrains the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy. In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics (pp. 81-89). London: Erlbaum.
56. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
57. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.