A classification of spatial stiffness based on the degree of translational-rotational coupling

Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME

Volumn 123, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 353-358

  Huang, Shuguang ^a   Schimmels, Joseph M ^a  

^a Marquette University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10844295592     PISSN: 10500472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.1374197     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Huang, S., and Schimmels, J. M., 1998, “The Bounds and Realization of Spatial Stiffnesses Achieved with Simple Springs Connected in Parallel,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 14, No. 3, pp. 466-475, June.
2. Huang, S., and Schimmels, J. M., 1998, “Achieving an Arbitrary Spatial Stiffness with Springs Connected in Parallel,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 120, No. 4, pp. 520-526, December.
3. Huang, S., and Schimmels, J. M., 2000, “The Eigenscrew Decomposition of Spatial Stiffness Matrices,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 16, No. 2, pp. 146-156, April.
4. Ball, R. S., 1900, A Treatise on the Theory of Screws, London, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
5. Dimentberg, F. M., 1965, “The Screw Calculus and its Applications in Mechanics,” Foreign Technology Division, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. Document No. FTD-HT-23-1632-67.
6. Griffis, M., and Duffy, J., 1991, “Kinestatic Control: A Novel Theory for Simultaneously Regulating Force and Displacement,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 113, No. 4, pp. 508-515.
7. Patterson, T., andLipkin, H., 1993, “Structure of Robot Compliance,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 115, No. 3, pp. 576-580.
8. Patterson, T., and Lipkin, H., 1993, “A Classification of Robot Compliance,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 115, No. 3, pp. 581-584.
9. Loncaric, J., 1987, “Normal Forms of Stiffness and Compliance Matrices,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 3, No. 6, pp. 567-572, December.
10. Fasse, E. D., and Breedveld, P. C., 1998, “Modeling of Elastically Coupled Bodies: Part 1 -General Theory and Geometric Potential Function Method,” J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 120, No. 4, pp. 496-500.
11. Fasse, E. D., and Breedveld, P. C., 1998, “Modeling of Elastically Coupled Bodies: Part 2-Exponential and Generalized Coordinate Methods,” J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 120, No. 4, pp. 501-506.
12. Zhang, S., and Fasse, E. D., 2000, “Spatial Compliance Modeling Using a Quaternion-based Potential Function Method,” Multibody System Dynamics, 4, No. 1, pp. 75-101, February.
13. Griffs, M., and Duffy, J., 1993, “Global Stiffness Modeling of a Class of Simple Compliant Couplings,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 28, No. 2, pp. 207-224.
14. Ciblak, N., and Lipkin, H., 1994, “Asymmetric Cartesian Stiffness for the Modelling of Compliant Robotic Systems,” In The ASME 23rd Biennial Mechanisms Conference, Design Engineering Division DE-Vol. 72, New York, NY.
15. Howard, W. S., Zefran, M., and Kumar, V., 1996, “On the 6X6 Stiffness Matrix for Three Dimensional Motions,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 33, No. 4, pp. 389-408.
16. Tokad, Y., 2000, “On the Equilibrium of a Rigid Body Suspended by a Set of Linear Springs,” J. Rob. Syst., 17, No. 8, pp. 417-427, August.
17. Roberts, R. G., 1999, “Minimal Realization of a Spatial Stiffness Matrix with Simple Springs Connected in Parallel,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 15, No. 5, pp. 953-958, October.
18. Ciblak, N., and Lipkin, H., 1999, “Synthesis of Cartesian Stiffness for Robotic Applications,” In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2147-2152, Detroit, MI, May.
19. Hill, R. D., and Waters, S. R., 1987, “On the Cone of Positive Semidefinite Matrices,” Linear Algebr. Appl., 90, pp. 81-88.
20. Huang, S., 1998, “The Analysis and Synthesis of Spatial Compliance,” PhD thesis, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
21. Wilkinson, J. H., 1965, The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem, Clarendon Press.