Speciation by sexual selection in hybridizing populations without viability selection

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 2, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 897-909

  Kawata, Masakado ^a   Yoshimura, Jin ^b,c,d  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b SHIZUOKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^d STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Reinforcement; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000047111     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Butlin, R. 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation. In Speciation and its Consequences (D. Otte and J.A. Endler, eds), pp. 158-179. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
2. Coyne, J.A. and Orr, H.A. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution, 43: 362-381.
3. Dieckmann, U. and Doebeli, M. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature, 400: 354-357.
4. Dobzhansky, T. 1951. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.
5. Doebeli, M. 1996. A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. J. Evol. Biol., 9: 893-909.
6. Futuyma, D.J. 1998. Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
7. Galis, F. and Metz, J.A.J. 1998. Why are there so many cichlid species? Trends Ecol. Evol., 13: 1-2.
8. Genner, M.J., Turner, G.F., Barker, S. and Hawkins, S.J. 1999. Niche segregation among Lake Malawi cichlid fishes? Evidence from stable isotope signatures. Ecol. Lett., 2: 185-190.
9. Gerhardt, H.C. 1994. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the gray tree frog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim. Behav., 47: 959-969.
10. Gibson, R.M. and Langen, T.A. 1996. How do animals choose their mates? Trends Ecol. Evol., 11: 468-470.
11. Guldemond, J.A. and Dixon, A.F.G. 1994. Specificity and daily cycle of release of sex pheromones in aphids: A case of reinforcement? Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 52: 287-303.
12. Kelly, J.K. and Noor, M.A.F. 1996. Speciation by reinforcement: A model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics, 143: 1485-1497.
13. Kondrashov, A.S. and Kondrashov, F.A. 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature, 400: 351-354.
14. Kondrashov, A.S. and Shpak, M. 1998. On the origin of species by means of assortative mating. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B, 265: 2273-2278.
15. Kuno, E. 1992. Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference. Res. Pop. Ecol., 34: 275-284.
16. Lande, R. 1982. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution, 36: 213-223.
17. Liou, L.W. and Price, T.D. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution, 48: 1451-1459.
18. Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat., 100: 637-650.
19. Noor, M.A. 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature, 375: 674-675.
20. Payne, R.J.H. and Krakauer, D.C. 1997. Sexual selection, space, and speciation. Evolution, 51: 1-9.
21. Pimm, S.L. 1979. Sympatric speciation: A simulation model. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 10: 275-289.
22. Reinthal, P.N. 1990. The feeding habits of herbivorous rock-dwelling cichlid fishes (Cichilidae: Perciformes) from Lake Malawi, Africa. Env. Biol. Fish, 27: 215-233.
23. Rice, W.R. and Hostert, E.E. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: What have we learned in 40 years? Evolution, 47: 1637-1653.
24. Sætre, G.-P., Moum, T., Bures, S., Kral, M., Adamjan, M. and Moreno, J. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces remating isolation. Nature, 387: 589-592.
25. Seehausen, O. and Van Alphen, J.J.M. 1998. The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 42: 1-8.
26. Seehausen, O., Van Alphen, J.J.M. and Witte, F. 1997. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science, 277: 1808-1811.
27. Turner, G.F. and Burrows, M.T. 1995. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B, 260: 287-292.
28. Widemo, F. and Sætre, S.A. 1999. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: Causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol., 14: 26-31.
29. Yoshimura, J. 1992. By-product runaway evolution by adaptive mate choice: A behavioral aspect of sexual selection. Evol. Ecol., 6: 261-269.
30. Yoshimura, J. and Clark, C.W. 1994. Population dynamics of sexual and resource competition. Theor. Pop. Biol., 45: 121-131.