The relationship between conspecific fertilization success and reproductive isolation among three congeneric sea urchins

Evolution

Volumn 56, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 1599-1689

  Levitan, Don R ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Echinoid; Hybridization; Reinforcement selection; Reproductive isolation; Sexual selection; Sperm competition; Sperm limitation

Indexed keywords

ECHINODERM; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION;

ECHINODERMATA; ECHINOIDA; ECHINOIDEA; INVERTEBRATA; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS DROEBACHIENSIS; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS FRANCISCANUS; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS PURPURATUS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GENETICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEA URCHIN; SPERM;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SEA URCHINS; SEMEN;

EID: 0036695154     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01472.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Andersson, M. A. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Babcock, R. C., G. D. Bull, P. L. Harrison, A. J. Heyward, J. K. Oliver, C. C. Wallace, and B. L. Willis. 1986. Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Biol. 90:379-394.
3. Biermann, C. H. 1998. The molecular evolution of sperm bindin in six species of sea urchins (Echinoida: Strongylocentrotidae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1761-1771.
4. Bureau, D. 1996. Relationship between feeding, reproductive condition, jaw size and density in the red sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus. M.Sc. thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.
5. Byrne, M., and M. J. Anderson. 1994. Hybridization of sympatric Patiriella species (Echinodermata, Asteroidea) in New South Wales. Evolution 48:564-576.
6. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
7. Dobzhansky, T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74:312-321.
8. Endler, J. A. 1989. Conceptual and other problems with species. Pp. 626-648 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
9. Farley, G. S., and D. R. Levitan. 2001. The role of jelly coats in sperm-egg encounters, fertilization success, and selection on egg size in broadcast spawners. Am. Nat. 157:626-636.
10. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
11. Gavrilets, S. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403:886-889.
12. Hagström, B. E., and S. Lönning. 1967. Experimental studies of Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis and S. pallidus. Sarsia 29: 165-176.
13. Harrison, P. L., R. C. Babcock, G. D. Bull, J. K. Oliver, C. C. Wallace, and B. L. Willis. 1984. Mass spawning in tropical reef corals. Science 223:1186-1198.
14. Himmelman, J. H. 1986. Population biology of green sea-urchins on rocky barrens. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 33:295-306.
15. Howard, D. J. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:189-216.
16. Knowlton, N., J. L. Mate, H. M. Guzman, R. Rowan, and J. Jara. 1997. Direct evidence for reproductive isolation among the three species of the Montastraea annularis complex in Central America (Panama and Honduras). Mar. Biol. 127:705-711.
17. Kozloff, E. N. 1973. Seashore life of the northern Pacific coast. Univ. of Washington Press, Seattle.
18. Kramer, D. E., and D. M. A. Nordin. 1978. Physical data from a study of size, weight and gonad quality for the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) over a one-year period. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Manuscript Report Series 1476. Pacific Biological Station, Namaimo, British Columbia.
19. Lessios, H. A., and C. W. Cunningham. 1990. Gametic incompatibility between species of the sea urchin Echinometra on the 2 sides of the isthmus of Panama. Evolution 44:933-941.
20. Levitan, D. R. 1993. The importance of sperm limitation to the evolution of egg size in marine invertebrates. Am. Nat. 141: 517-536.
21. -. 1996. Effects of gamete traits on fertilization in the sea and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Nature 382:153-155.
22. -. 1998a. Does Bateman's principle apply to broadcast-spawning organisms? Egg traits influence in situ fertilization rates among congeneric sea urchins. Evolution 52:1043-1056.
23. -. 1998b. Sperm limitation, sperm competition, and sexual selection in external fertilizers. Pp. 173-215 in T. Birkhead and A. Møller, eds. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, New York.
24. -. 2000a. Sperm velocity and endurance trade-off and influence fertilization in the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:531-534.
25. -. 2000b. Optimal egg size in marine invertebrates: theory and phylogenetic analysis of the critical relationship between egg size and development time in echinoids. Am. Nat. 156: 175-192.
26. -. 2002. Density-dependent selection on gamete traits in three congeneric sea urchins. Ecology 83:464-479.
27. Levitan, D. R., and R. K. Grosberg. 1993. The analysis of paternity and maternity in the marine hydrozoan Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Mol. Ecol. 2:315-326.
28. Levitan, D. R., and S. D. Irvine. 2001. Fertilization selection on egg and jelly-coat size in the sand dollar Dendraster excentricus. Evolution 55:2479-2483.
29. Levitan, D. R., M. A. Sewell, and F.-S. Chia. 1991. Kinetics of fertilization in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus: interaction of gamete dilution, age, and contact time. Biol. Bull. 181:371-378.
30. Liou, L. W., and T. D. Price. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48:1451-1459.
31. Maniatis, T., E. F. Fritsch, and J. Sambrook. 1982. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
32. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
33. McEdward, L. E. 1986. Comparative morphometrics of echinoderm larvae. II. Larval size, shape, growth, and the scaling of feeding and metabolism in echinoplutei. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 96: 267-286.
34. Metz, E. C., and S. R. Palumbi. 1996. Positive selection and sequence rearrangements generate extensive polymorphism in the gamete recognition protein bindin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:397-406.
35. Noor, M. A. F. 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83:503-508.
36. Palumbi, S. R. 1994. Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25:547-572.
37. -. 1999. All males are not created equal: fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:12632-12637.
38. Palumbi, S. R., and E. C. Metz. 1991. Strong reproductive isolation between closely related tropical sea urchins (genus Echinometra). Mol. Biol. Evol. 8:227-239.
39. Palumbi, S. R., and A. C. Wilson. 1990. Mitochondrial DNA di- versity in the sea urchins Strongylocentrotus purpuratus and Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Evolution 44:403-415.
40. Pearse, J. S., D. J. McClary, M. A. Sewell, W. C. Austin, A. Perez-Ruzafa, and M. Byrne. 1988. Simultaneous spawning of 6 species of echinoderms in Barkley Sound, British Columbia. Int. J. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 14:279-288.
41. Podolsky, R. D. 2001. Evolution of egg target size: an analysis of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 55:2470-2478.
42. Rumrill, S. S. 1990. Natural mortality of marine invertebrate larvae. Ophelia 32:163-198.
43. Schroeter, S. C. 1978. Experimental studies of competition as a factor affecting the distribution and abundance of purple sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (Stimpson). Ph.D. diss., University of California, Santa Barbara.
44. Smith, A. B. 1988. Phylogenetic relationship, divergence times, and rates of molecular evolution for camarodont sea urchins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:345-365.
45. Strathmann, M. 1987. Phylum Echinodermata, class Echinoidea. Pp. 522-534 in M. Strathmann, ed. Reproduction and development of marine invertebrates of the northern Pacific coast. Univ. of Washington Press, Seattle.
46. Strathmann, R. R. 1979. Echinoid larvae from the northeast Pacific (with a key and comment on an unusual type of planktotrophic development). Can. J. Zool. 57:610-616.
47. -. 1981. On barriers to hybridization between Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (O. F. Muller) and Strongylocentrotus pallidus (G. O. Sars), J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 55:39-47.
48. Templeton, A. R. 1981. Mechanisms of speciation a population genetic approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12:23-48.
49. Vacquier, V. D., W. J. Swanson, and Y.-H. Lee. 1997. Positive Darwinian selection on two homologous fertilization proteins: What is the selective pressure driving their divergence? J. Mol. Evol. 44:S15-S22.
50. Vogel, H., G. Czihak, P. Chang, and W. Wolf. 1982. Fertilization kinetics of sea-urchin eggs. Math. Biosci. 58:189-216.
51. Waddell, B. J., R. I. Perry, G. Scharf, and G. Ross. 1997. Surveys of green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) populations in Queen Charlotte Strait, British Columbia, October 1995 and March 1996. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences no. 2143.
52. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983, Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155-183.
53. Yund, P. O. 2000. How severe is sperm limitation in natural populations of marine free-spawners? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:10-13.