Genetics of sexual isolation and courtship dysfunction in male hybrids of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis

Evolution

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 809-815

  Noor, Mohamed A F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Courtship intensity; Drosophila persimilis; Drosophila pseudoobscura; Mating discrimination; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA PERSIMILIS; DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA;

EID: 0030845464     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03663.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ANDERSON, W. W. 1993. Linkage map of Drosophila pseudoobscura. P. 3.252 in S. J. O'Brien, ed. Genetic maps: locus maps of complex genomes. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY.
2. ANDERSON, W. W., L. LEVINE, O. OLVERA, J. R. POWELL, M. E. DE LA ROSA, V. M. SALCEDA, M. I. GASO, AND J. GUZMAN. 1979. Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA 76:1519-1523.
3. BARTON, N. H., AND B. CHARLESWORTH. 1984. Genetic revolutions, founder effects, and speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:133-164.
4. BROWN, R. G. B. 1964. Courtship behaviour in the Drosophila obscura group. I.: D. pseudoobscura. Behaviour 23:61-106.
5. CHARLESWORTH, B., J. A. COYNE, AND N. H. BARTON. 1987. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130:113-146.
6. COYNE, J. A. 1992a. Genetics and speciation. Nature 355:511-515.
7. _. 1992b. Genetics of sexual isolation in females of the Drosophila simulans species complex. Genet. Res. Camb. 60:25-31.
8. _. 1996. Genetics of sexual isolation in male hybrids of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genet. Res. Camb. 68:211-220.
9. COYNE, J. A., A. P. CRITTENDEN AND K. MAH. 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265: 1461-1464.
10. DAVIES, N., A. AIELLO, J. MALLET, A. POMIANKOWSKI, AND R. E. SILBERGLIED. 1997. Speciation in two neotropical butterflies: extending Haldane's rule. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. In press.
11. EHRMAN, L. 1961. The genetics of sexual isolation in Drosophila paulistorum. Genetics 46:1025-1038.
12. EWING, A. W. 1969. The genetic basis of sound production in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Anim. Behav. 17: 555-560.
13. HALDANE, J. B. S. 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals, J. Genet. 12:101-109.
14. HALL, J. C. 1994. The mating of a fly. Science 264:1702-1714.
15. HARMSEN, R., AND D. R. CLARK. 1987. The effects of inbreeding and ventilation on mating behavior in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Behav. Prog. 15:181-190.
16. HUTTER, C. M., AND D. M. RAND. 1995. Competition between mitochondrial haplotypes in distinct nuclear genetic environments: Drosophila pseudoobscura vs. D. persimilis. Genetics 140: 537-548.
17. KANESHIRO, K. Y. 1989. The dynamics of sexual selection and founder effects in species formation. Pp. 279-296 in L. V. Giddings, K. Y. Kaneshiro, and W. W. Anderson, eds. Genetics, speciation and the founder principle. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
18. KYRIACOU, C. P., AND J. C. HALL. 1982. The function of courtship song rhythms in Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 30: 794-801.
19. LIOU, L. W., AND T. D. PRICE. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48:1451-1459.
20. MAYR, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. MEFFERT, L. M., AND E. H. BRYANT. 1992. Divergent ambulatory and grooming behavior in serially bottlenecked lines of the housefly. Evolution 46:1399-1407.
22. NOOR, M. A. 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375:674-675.
23. _. 1996a. Absence of species discrimination in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis males. Anim. Behav. 52:1205-1210.
24. _. 1996b. Activity level of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis hybrid males. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 77:51-52.
25. NOOR, M. A. F., AND J. A. COYNE. 1996. Genetics of a difference in cuticular hydrocarbons between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genet. Res., Camb. 68:117-123.
26. OGUMA, Y., S. WEN, M. TOMARU, H. MATSUBAYASHI, AND T. PENG. 1995. Reproductive isolation between Drosophila lini and its siblings. Jpn. J. Genet. 70:311-320.
27. ORR, H. A. 1995. A new linkage map of the D. pseudoobscura X chromosome. Drosophila Inf. Serv. 76:127-128.
28. PASHLEY, D. P., AND J. A. MARTIN. 1987. Reproductive incompatibility between host strains of the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 80:731-733.
29. RITCHIE, M. G. AND S. D. F. PHILLIPS. In press. The genetics of sexual isolation. In D. Howard and S. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
30. TAN, C. C. 1946. Genetics of sexual isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Genetics 31:558-573.
31. TOMARU, M., H. MATSUBAYASHI, AND Y. OGUMA, 1995. Heterospecific inter-pulse intervals of courtship songs elicit female rejection in Drosophila biauraria. Anim. Behav. 50: 905-914.
32. TOMPKINS, L., J. C. HALL, AND L. M. HALL. 1980, Courtship-stimulating volatile compounds from normal and mutant Drosophila. J. Insect Physiol. 26:689-697.
33. TURNER, G. F., AND M. T. BURROWS. 1995. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 260:287-292.
34. WALDRON, I. 1964. Courtship sound production in two sympatric sibling Drosophila species. Science 144:191-193.
35. WEISBROT, D. G. 1963. Studies on differences in the genetic architecture of related species of Drosophila. Genetics 48:1121-1139.
36. YOON, C. K. 1991. Molecular and behavioral evolution in the semi-species of Drosophila athabasca. Ph.D. diss., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
37. ZOUROS, E. 1981. The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mojavensis. Genetics 97:703-718.