Incongruence between cladistic and taxonomic systems

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1263-1270

  Grant, Verne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cladistics; Molecular systematics; Paraphyly; Phylogenetics; Systematics; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; PHYLOGENETICS; TAXONOMY;

EID: 0348196955     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.9.1263     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. ANDERBERG, A. A., C. RYDIN, AND M. KALLERSJO. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the order Ericales s.l.: analyses of molecular data from five genes from the plastid and mitochondria genomes. American Journal of Botany 89: 677-687.
2. ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
3. BROWN, W. 1938. The bearing of nectaries on the phylogeny of flowering plants. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 79: 549-595.
4. BRUMMITT, R. K. 1997. Taxonomy versus cladonomy, a fundamental controversy in biological systematics. Taxon 46: 723-734.
5. BRUMMITT, R. K. 2002. How to chop up a tree. Taxon 51: 31-41.
6. CRONN, R. C., R. L. SMALL, T. HASELKORN, AND J. F. WENDEL. 2002. Rapid diversification of the cotton genus (Gossypium, Malvaceae) revealed by analysis of sixteen nuclear and chloroplast genes. American Journal of Botany 89: 707-725.
7. CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
8. CRONQUIST, A. 1987. A botanical critique of cladism. Botanical Review 53: 1-50.
9. DAY, A. G. 1993a. Gilia. In J. C. Hickman [ed.], The Jepson manual: higher plants of California, 828-835. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
10. DAY, A. G. 1993b. New taxa and nomenclatural changes in Allophyllum, Gilia, and Navarretia (Polemoniaceae). Novon 3: 331-340.
11. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1997. The Linnean hierarchy and the evolutionization of taxonomy, with emphasis on the problem of nomenclature. Aliso 15: 125-144.
12. DIGGS, G. M., AND B. L. LIPSCOMB. 2002. What is the writer of a flora to do? Evolutionary taxonomy or phylogenetic systematics? Sida 20: 647-674.
13. DIGGS, G. M., B. L. LIPSCOMB, AND R. J. O'KENNON. 1999. Illustrated flora of north central Texas. Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
14. DOEBLEY, J. 1989. Molecular evidence for a missing wild relative of maize and the introgression of its chloroplast genome into Zea perennis. Evolution 43: 1555-1559.
15. FERGUSON, C. J., AND R. K. JANSEN. 2002. A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of eastern Phlox (Polemoniaceae): implications of congruence and incongruence with the ITS phylogeny. American Journal of Botany 89: 1324-1335.
16. GRANT, V. 1959. Natural history of the phlox family. Martinus Nijhoff. The Hague, Netherlands.
17. GRANT, V. 1975. Genetics of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
18. GRANT, V. 1998. Primary classifications and phylogeny of the Polemoniaceae, with comments on molecular cladistics. American Journal of Botany 85: 741-752.
19. GRANT, V. 1999. Classification of the genus Gilia (Polemoniaceae). Phytologia 84: 69-86.
20. GRANT, V. 2001a. A guide to understanding recent classifications of the family Polemoniaceae. Lundellia 4: 12-24.
21. GRANT, V. 2001b. Tests of the accuracy of cladograms in Gilia and some other angiosperm genera. Plant Systematics and Evolution 230: 89-96.
22. GRANT, V., AND A. DAY. 1999. Transfer of some species from Gilia to Allophyllum and Tintinabulum, and the effects of the transfer on the generic definition of Gilia (Polemoniaceae). Phytologia 84: 368-382.
23. GUPTA, P. K., P. K. SHARMA, H. S. BALYAN, J. K. ROY, S. SHARMA, A. BEHARAV, AND E. NEVO. 2002. Polymorphism at rDNA loci in barley and its relation with climatic variables. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 473-481.
24. HAECKEL, E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Georg Reiner, Berlin, Germany.
25. HARDIG, T. M., P. S. SOLTIS, AND D. E. SOLTIS. 2000. Diversification of the North American shrub genus Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae): conflicting phylogenies from nuclear ribosomal DNA and chloroplast DNA. American Journal of Botany 87: 108-123.
26. HENNIG, W. 1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
27. HENNIG, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
28. HILEMAN, L. C., M. C. VASEY, AND V. T. PARKER. 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Arbutoideae (Ericaceae): implications for the Madrean-Tethyan hypothesis, Systematic Botany 26: 131-143.
29. JOHNSON, L. A., L. SCHULTZ, D. E. SOLTIS, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1996. Monophyly and generic relationships of Polemoniaceae based on matK sequences. American Journal of Botany 83: 1207-1224.
30. JUDD, W. S., C. S. CAMPBELL, E. A. KELLOGG, AND P. F. STEVENS. 1999. Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach, 1st ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
31. JUDD, W. S., C. S. CAMPBELL, E. A. KELLOGG, P. F. STEVENS, AND M. J. DONOGHUE, 2002. Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach, 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
32. KELLOGG, E. A., R. APPELS, AND R. J. MASON-GAMER. 1996. When genes tell different stories: the diploid genera of Triticeae (Gramineae). Systematic Botany 21: 321-347.
33. LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum, 1st ed. Stockholm, Sweden.
34. LINNAEUS, C. 1759. Systema naturae, 10th ed. Stockholm, Sweden.
35. MAYR, E. 1995. Systems of ordering data. Biology and Philosophy 10: 419-434.
36. MAYR, E. 1997. This is biology; the science of the living world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
37. MAYR, E., AND P. D. ASHLOCK. 1991. Principles of systematic zoology, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.
38. MAYR, E., AND W. BOCK. 2002. Classifications and other ordering systems. Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 40: 169-194.
39. MCKINNON, G. E., D. A. STEANE, B. M. POTTS, AND R. E. VAILANCOURT. 1999. Incongruence between chloroplast and species phylogenies in Eucalyptus subgenus Monocalyptus (Myrtaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1038-1046.
40. MORITZ, C., AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. The evolution of molecular systematics. In D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable [eds.], Molecular systematics, 2nd ed., 1-13. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
41. NEVO, E., A. B. KOROL, A. BEILES, AND T. FAHIMA. 2002. Evolution of wild emmer and wheat improvement; population genetics, genetic resources, and genome organization of wheat's progenitor, Triticum dicoccoides. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
42. PORTER, M. M. 1997. Phylogeny of Polemoniaceae based on ribosomal internal transcribed DNA sequences. Aliso 15: 57-77.
43. PORTER, M. M., AND L. A. JOHNSON. 2000. A phylogenetic classification of Polemoniaceae. Aliso 19: 55-91.
44. REED, D. H., AND R. FRANKHAM. 2001. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution 55: 1095-1103.
45. RIESEBERG, L. H., AND L. BROUILLET. 1994. Are many plant species paraphyletic? Taxon 43: 21-32.
46. RIESEBERG, L. H., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1991. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evolutionary Trends in Plants 5: 65-84.
47. SOSEF, M. S. M. 1997. Hierchical models, reticulate evolution, and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa. Taxon 46: 75-85.
48. STUESSY, T. F. 1990. Plant taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
49. STUESSY, T. F. 1997. Classification: more than just branching patterns of evolution. Aliso 15: 113-124.
50. SYTSMA, K., J. F. SMITH, AND L. D. GOTTLIEB. 1990. Biogeography and evolution of morphology, breeding systems, flavonoids, and chloroplast DNA in the four Old World species of Fuchsia (Onagraceae). Systematic Botany 15: 280-295.
51. TURNER, B. L. 1998. Plant systematics: beginnings and endings. Aliso 17: 189-200.
52. VAN HAM, R. C., AND H. HART. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships in the Crassulaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. American Journal of Botany 85: 123-134.
53. WELLS, P. V. 2000. The manzanitas of California, also of Mexico and the world. Published by the author, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
54. WHEWELL, W. 1859. History of the inductive sciences, 3rd ed. Appleton, New York, New York, USA.
55. WILEY, E. O., D. SIEGEL-CAUSEY, D. R. BROOKS, AND V. A. FUNK. 1991. The compleat cladist; a primer of phylogenetic procedures. Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
56. YOO, K. O., P. P. LOWRY, AND J. WEN. 2002. Discordance of chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA data in Osmorhiza (Apiaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 966-971.