Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa

Taxon

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 75-85

  Sosef, M S M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINNAEA;

EID: 0031006329     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1224293     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Brummitt, R. K. 1996. In defence of paraphyletic taxa. Pp. 371-384 in: Maesen, L. J. G. van der, Burgt, X. M. van der & Medenbach de Rooy, J. M. van (ed.), The biodiversity of African plants. Proceedings XIVth AETFAT Congress 22-27 August 1994, Wageningen, the Netherlands. Dordrecht.
2. Cronquist, A. 1987. A botanical critique of cladism. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 53: 1-52.
3. Crowson, R. A. 1970. Classification and biology. New York.
4. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London.
5. Donoghue, M. J. & Cantino, P. D. 1988. Paraphyly, ancestors, and the goals of taxonomy: a botanical defense of cladism. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 54: 107-128.
6. Duistermaat, H. 1996. Monograph of Arctium L. (Asteraceae). Generic delimitation (including Cousinia Cass. p.p.), revision of the species, pollen morphology, and hybrids. Gorteria, Suppl. 3.
7. Estabrook, G. F. 1978. Some concepts for the estimation of evolutionary relationships in systematic botany. Syst. Bot. 3: 146-150.
8. _ 1986. Evolutionary classification using convex phenetics. Syst. Zool. 35: 560-570.
9. Farris, J. S. 1974. Formal definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly. Syst. Zool. 23: 548-554.
10. _ 1979. The information content of the phylogenetic system. Syst. Zool. 28: 483-519.
11. Geesink, R. & Kornet, D. J. 1989. Speciation and Malesian Leguminosae. Pp. 135-151 in: Holm-Nielsen, L. B., Nielsen, I. C. & Balslev, H. (ed.), Tropical forests: botanical dynamics, speciation and diversity. London.
12. Ghiselin, M. T. 1974. A radical solution to the species problem. Syst. Zool. 23: 536-544.
13. Grant, V. 1971. Plant speciation. New York.
14. Griffiths, G. C. D. 1973. Some fundamental problems in biological classification. Syst. Zool. 22: 338-343.
15. _ 1976. The future of Linnaean nomenclature. Syst. Zool. 25: 168-173.
16. Haeckel, E. H. P. A. 1894-1895. Systematische Phylogenie: Entwurf eines natürlichen Systems der Organismen auf Grund ihrer Stammesgeschichte. Berlin.
17. Hedberg, O. 1995. Cladistics in taxonomic botany - master or servant? Taxon 44: 3-11.
18. Hennig, W. 1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin.
19. _ 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana.
20. Knox, E. B. 1997. The use of hierarchies as organizational models in systematics. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) (in press)
21. Kornet, D. J. 1988. Conventional and fundamental problems in the delimitation of genera from a phylogenetic point of view. Acta Bot. Neerl. 37: 527-529.
22. _ 1993. Reconstructing species. Demarcations in genealogical networks. Thesis, Leiden.
23. Lam, H. J. 1936. Phylogenetic symbols, past and present. Acta Biotheor. 2: 153-194.
24. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. New York.
25. McDade, L. 1990. Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics I. Patterns of character expression in hybrids and their implications for cladistic analysis. Evolution 44: 1685-1700.
26. Meacham, C. A. & Duncan, T. 1987. The necessity of convex groups in biological classification. Syst. Bot. 12: 78-90.
27. Nixon, K. C. & Wheeler, Q. D. 1990. An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6: 211-223.
28. Philips, R. B. 1984. Considerations in formalizing a classification. Pp. 257-272 in: Duncan, T. & Stuessy, T. F. (ed.), Cladistics: perspectives on the reconstruction of evolutionary history. New York.
29. Platnick, N. I. 1976. Are monotypic genera possible? Syst. Zool. 25: 198-199.
30. _ 1977. Paraphyletic and polyphyletic groups. Syst. Zool. 26: 195-200.
31. Popper, K. R. 1968. The logic of scientific discovery. New York.
32. Queiroz, K. de & Donoghue, M. J. 1990. Phylogenetic systematics or Nelson's version of cladistics? Cladistics 6: 61-75.
33. _ & Gauthier, J. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449-480.
34. _ 1994. Towards a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27-31.
35. Rieseberg, L. H. & Brouillet, L. 1994. Are many plant species paraphyletic? Taxon 43: 21-32
36. _ & Morefield, J. D. 1995. Character expression, phylogenetic reconstruction, and the detection of reticulate evolution. [In: Hoch, P. C. & Stephenson, A. G., Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics.] Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 53: 333-353.
37. Sosef, M. S. M. 1994. Refuge begonias. Taxonomy, phylogeny and historical biogeography of Begonia sect. Loasibegonia and sect. Scutobegonia in relation to glacial rain forest refuges in Africa. Wageningen Agric. Univ. Papers 94-1 [& Belmontia, N.S., 26].
38. Stace, C. A. 1975. Hybridization and the flora of the British Isles. London.
39. Stuessy, T. F. 1990. Plant taxonomy: the systematic evaluation of comparative data. New York.
40. Weizen, P. C. van, 1997. Paraphyletic groups or what should a classification entail. Taxon 46: 99-103.
41. White, M. J. D. 1978. Modes of speciation. San Francisco.
42. Wiley, E. O. 1977. Are monotypic genera paraphyletic? - A response to Norman Platnick. Syst. Zool. 26: 352-355.
43. _ 1979. An annotated Linnaean hierarchy, with comments on natural taxa and competing systems. Syst. Zool. 28: 308-337.
44. _ 1981a. Convex groups and consistent classifications. Syst. Bot. 6: 346-358.
45. _ 1981b. Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. New York, etc.