L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon diversity differs dramatically between mammals and fish

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 9-14

  Furano, Anthony V ^a   Duvernell, David D ^b   Boissinot, Stephane ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; FISH; GENE REPLICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; LONG INTERSPERSED REPEAT; MAMMAL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPOSON; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; ZEBRA FISH;

DANIO RERIO; MAMMALIA;

EID: 0348048755     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Eickbush T.H., Malik H.S. Origins and evolution of retrotransposons. Craig N.L., et al. Mobile DNA II. 2002;1111-1144 ASM Press.
2. Arkhipova I., Meselson M. Transposable elements in sexual and ancient asexual taxa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;14473-14477.
3. Boissinot S., et al. Selection against deleterious LINE-1-containing loci in the human lineage. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:2001;926-935.
4. Volff J.N., et al. Multiple lineages of the non-LTR retrotransposon Rex1 with varying success in invading fish genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:2000;1673-1684.
5. Waterson R.H., et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 420:2002;520-562.
6. Lander E.S., et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 409:2001;860-921.
7. Furano A.V. The biological properties and evolutionary dynamics of mammalian LINE-1 retrotransposons. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 64:2000;255-294.
8. Dewannieux M., et al. LINE-mediated retrotransposition of marked Alu sequences. Nat. Genet. 35:2003;41-48.
9. Boissinot S., et al. L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon evolution and amplification in recent human history. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:2000;915-928.
10. Smit A.F.A., et al. Ancestral, mammalian-wide subfamilies of LINE-1 repetitive sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 246:1995;401-417.
11. Buzdin A., et al. Genome-wide targeted search for human specific and polymorphic L1 integrations. Hum. Genet. 112:2003;527-533.
12. Adey N.B., et al. Rodent L1 evolution has been driven by a single dominant lineage that has repeatedly acquired new transcriptional regulatory sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;778-789.
13. Hardies S.C., et al. LINE-1 (L1) lineages in the mouse. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:2000;616-628.
14. Saxton J.A., Martin S.L. Recombination between subtypes creates a mosaic lineage of LINE-1 that is expressed and actively retrotransposing in the mouse genome. J. Mol. Biol. 280:1998;611-622.
15. Naas T.P., et al. An actively retrotransposing, novel subfamily of mouse L1 elements. EMBO J. 17:1998;590-597.
16. Goodier J.L., et al. A novel active L1 retrotransposon subfamily in the mouse. Genome Res. 11:2001;1677-1685.
17. Hardies S.C., et al. An analysis of replacement and synonymous changes in the rodent L1 repeat family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:1986;109-125.
18. Guenet J.L., Bonhomme F. Wild mice: an ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends Genet. 19:2003;24-31.
19. Cabot E.L., et al. Rapid evolution of a young L1 (LINE-1) clade in recently speciated Rattus taxa. J. Mol. Evol. 45:1997;412-423.
20. Volff, J. et al. Diversity of retrotransposable elements in compact pufferfish genomes. Trends Genet. (in press).
21. Eickbush T.H., Furano A.V. Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12:2002;669-674.
22. Duvernell D.D., Turner B.J. Variation and divergence of death valley pupfish populations at retrotransposon-defined loci. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1999;363-371.
23. Langley C.H., et al. On the role of unequal exchange in the containment of transposable element copy number. Genet. Res. 52:1988;223-235.
24. Montgomery E.A., et al. Chromosome rearrangement by ectopic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster: genome structure and evolution. Genetics. 129:1991;1085-1098.
25. Petrov D.A., et al. Size matters: non-LTR retrotransposable elements and ectopic recombination in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:2003;880-892.
26. Cooper D.M., et al. Factors affecting ectopic gene conversion in mice. Mamm. Genome. 9:1998;355-360.
27. McNaughton J.C., et al. Is gene deletion in eukaryotes sequence-dependent? A study of nine deletion junctions and nineteen other deletion breakpoints in intron 7 of the human dystrophin gene. Gene. 222:1998;41-51.
28. Richard M., et al. Integration of a vector containing a repetitive LINE-1 element in the human genome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:1994;6689-6695.
29. Yoder J.A., et al. Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet. 13:1997;335-340.
30. Walsh C.P., et al. Transcription of IAP endogenous retroviruses is constrained by cytosine methylation. Nat. Genet. 20:1998;116-117.
31. Bestor T.H. Cytosine methylation mediates sexual conflict. Trends Genet. 19:2003;185-190.
32. Bird A. Does DNA methylation control transposition of selfish elements in the germline? Trends Genet. 13:1997;469-472.
33. Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 16:2002;6-21.
34. Kilbourne E.D. Host determination of viral evolution: a variable tautology. Morse S.S. The Evolutionary Biology of Viruses. 1994;253-271 Raven Press.
35. Zanotto P.M., et al. Genealogical evidence for positive selection in the nef gene of HIV-1. Genetics. 153:1999;1077-1089.
36. Haydon D.T., et al. Evidence for positive selection in foot-and-mouth disease virus capsid genes from field isolates. Genetics. 157:2001;7-15.
37. Yang Z. Inference of selection from multiple species alignments. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12:2002;688-694.
38. Boissinot S., Furano A.V. Adaptive evolution in LINE-1 retrotransposons. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:2001;2186-2194.
39. Lupas A. Coiled coils: new structures and new functions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21:1996;375-382.
40. Hohjoh H., Singer M.F. Cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein complexes containing human LINE-1 protein and RNA. EMBO J. 15:1996;630-639.
41. Martin S.L., et al. Deletion analysis defines distinct functional domains for protein-protein and nucleic acid interactions in the ORF1 protein of mouse LINE-1. J. Mol. Biol. 304:2000;11-20.
42. Mears M.L., Hutchison C.A. 3rd. The evolution of modern lineages of mouse L1 elements. J. Mol. Evol. 52:2001;51-62.
43. Lindtner S., et al. An element in the 3′ untranslated region of human LINE-1 retrotransposon mRNA binds NXF1(TAP) and can function as a nuclear export element. RNA. 8:2002;345-356.
44. Floyd J.A., et al. A natural allele of Nxf1 suppresses retrovirus insertional mutations. Nat. Genet. 35:2003;221-228.
45. Howell R., Usdin K. The ability to form intrastrand tetraplexes is an evolutionarily conserved feature of the 3′ end of L1 retrotransposons. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997;144-155.
46. Malik H.S., et al. The age and evolution of non-LTR retrotransposable elements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1999;793-805.
47. Swofford D.L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods) Version 4. 1998;Sinauer Associates.
48. Stauffer R.L., et al. Human and ape molecular clocks and constraints on paleontological hypotheses. J. Hered. 92:2001;469-474.