Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 669-674

  Eickbush, Thomas H ^a   Furano, Anthony V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA; GENE INSERTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOME; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPOSON; REVIEW; ANIMAL; GENETICS; LONG INTERSPERSED REPEAT; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; LONG INTERSPERSED NUCLEOTIDE ELEMENTS; PHYLOGENY; RETROELEMENTS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036889395     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-437X(02)00359-3     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. International Human Genome Consortium . Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 409:2001;860-921. Required reading for anyone interested in retrotransposons. This beautifully written paper presents an unusually thorough analysis of the classes, abundance and chromosomal distribution of mobile elements in the human genome. Unlike most 'genome sequence' papers that simply catalogue the elements, this paper also addresses the difficult issues of selective pressure either for or against these elements, and the accumulation of elements over time.
2. SanMiguel P., Tikhonov A., Jin Y.K., Motchoulskaia N., Zakharov D., Melake-Berhan A., Springer P.S., Edwards K.J., Lee M., Avramova Z., et al. Nested retrotransposons in the intergenic regions of the maize genome. Science. 274:1996;765-768.
3. Venter J.C., Adams M.D., Myers E.W., Li P.W., Mural R.J., Sutton G.G., Smith H.O., Yandell M., Evans C.A., Holt R.A., et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 291:2001;1304-1351.
4. Adams M.D., Celniker S.E., Holt R.A., Evans C.A., Gocayne J.D., Amanatides P.G., Scherer S.E., Li P.W., Hoskins R.A., Galle R.F., et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 287:2000;2185-2195.
5. Initiative T.A. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 408:2000;796-815.
6. Bartolome C., Maside X., Charlesworth B. On the abundance and distribution of transposable elements in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 19:2002;926-937. As with [9•], the authors survey the genomic data made available from the initial reports of the D. melanogaster genomic sequence [4] . The primary objective was to determine whether the abundance of transposable elements correlates inversely with the recombination rate. The authors find that element distribution is generally consistent with the ectopic exchange model (but see [9•] ).
7. Berezikov E, Bucheton A, Busseau I: A search for reverse transcriptase-coding sequences reveals new non-LTR retrotransposons in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol. 2000, 1:RESEARCH0012.
8. Bowen N.J., McDonald J.F. Drosophila euchromatic LTR retrotransposons are much younger than the host species in which they reside. Genome Res. 11:2001;1527-1540.
9. Rizzon C., Marais G., Gouy M., Biemont C. Recombination rate and the distribution of transposable elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Res. 12:2002;400-407. As with [6•], the authors attempt to correlate the abundance of Drosophila transposable elements with the rate of recombination. This is a good example of how conclusions are occasionally dependent upon the data analysis details. The authors also examined the genomic sequences made available in [4] but find no clear inverse correlation of retrotransposon abundance and the recombination rate.
10. Eickbush T.H., Malik H.S. Origins and evolution of retrotransposons. Craig N.L., Craigie R., Gellert M., Lambowitz A.M., Mobile DNA II. 2002;1111-1144 ASM Press, Washington, DC.
11. Charlesworth B., Langley C.H. The population genetics of Drosophila transposable elements. Annu Rev Genet. 23:1989;251-287.
12. Charlesworth B., Sniegowski P., Stephan W. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature. 371:1994;215-220.
13. Finnegan D.J. Transposable Elements. Lindsley D.L., Zimm G.G., The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster. 1992;Academic Press, San Diego.
14. Biemont C., Tsitrone A., Vieira C., Hoogland C. Transposable element distribution in Drosophila. Genetics. 147:1997;1997-1999.
15. Charlesworth B., Langley C.H., Sniegowski P.D. Transposable element distributions in Drosophila. Genetics. 147:1997;1993-1995.
16. Duret L., Marais G., Biemont C. Transposons but not retrotransposons are located preferentially in regions of high recombination rate in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 156:2000;1661-1669.
17. Maside X., Bartolome C., Assimacopoulos S., Charlesworth B. Rates of movement and distribution of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster: in situ hybridization vs Southern blotting data. Genet Res. 78:2001;121-136.
18. Langley C.H., Montgomery E., Hudson R., Kaplan N., Charlesworth B. On the role of unequal exchange in the containment of transposable element copy number. Genet Res. 52:1988;223-235.
19. Montgomery E.A., Huang S.M., Langley C.H., Judd B.H. Chromosome rearrangement by ectopic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster: genome structure and evolution. Genetics. 129:1991;1085-1098.
20. Hill W.G., Robertson A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 8:1966;269-294.
21. Muller H.J. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat Res. 1:1964;2-9.
22. Gordo I., Charlesworth B. Genetic linkage and molecular evolution. Curr Biol. 11:2001;R684-R686.
23. Carr M., Soloway J.R., Robinson T.E., Brookfield J.F. Mechanisms regulating the copy numbers of six LTR retrotransposons in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma. 110:2002;511-518.
24. Benit L., Lallemand J.B., Casella J.F., Philippe H., Heidmann T. ERV-L elements: a family of endogenous retrovirus-like elements active throughout the evolution of mammals. J Virol. 73:1999;3301-3308.
25. Mayer J., Sauter M., Racz A., Scherer D., Mueller-Lantzsch N., Meese E. An almost-intact human endogenous retrovirus K on human chromosome 7. Nat Genet. 21:1999;257-258.
26. Costas J. Characterization of the intragenomic spread of the human endogenous retrovirus family HERV-W. Mol Biol Evol. 19:2002;526-533.
27. Pavlicek A., Paces J., Elleder D., Hejnar J. Processed pseudogenes of human endogenous retroviruses generated by LINEs: their integration, stability, and distribution. Genome Res. 12:2002;391-399.
28. Esnault C., Maestre J., Heidmann T. Human LINE retrotransposons generate processed pseudogenes. Nat Genet. 24:2000;363-367. The authors demonstrate that the L1 retrotransposition machinery can generate insertions from non-L1 RNA similar to the processed pseudogenes found in the human genome. The efficiency with which these RNAs are used as templates was lower than that of L1 RNA, suggesting a cis preference for L1 transcripts.
29. Kazazian H.H. Jr. Mobile elements and disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 8:1998;343-350.
30. Smit A.F.A., Tóth G., Riggs A.D., Jurka J. Ancestral, mammalian-wide subfamilies of LINE-1 repetitive sequences. J Mol Biol. 246:1995;401-417.
31. Boissinot S., Entezam A., Furano A.V. Selection against deleterious LINE-1-containing loci in the human lineage. Mol Biol Evol. 18:2001;926-935. This paper provides the first evidence that L1 elements exerted a genetic load during evolution of the human lineage by showing a deficiency of full-length L1 elements on the autosomes relative to the X and Y chromsosomes.
32. Furano A.V. The biological properties and evolutionary dynamics of mammalian LINE-1 retrotransposons. Prog Nucl Acids Res Mol Biol. 64:2000;255-294.
33. Boissinot S., Chevret P., Furano A.V. L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon evolution and amplification in recent human history. Mol Biol Evol. 17:2000;915-928. The authors demonstrate that L1 evolution and amplification has occurred in recent human history and is presumably still ongoing. Their identification of the subfamilies that compose the currently active L1 family was important for identifying which inserts were likely to be polymorphic and thus useful for genetic analysis (see [40] ).
34. Wei W., Gilbert N., Ooi S.L., Lawler J.F., Ostertag E.M., Kazazian H.H., Boeke J.D., Moran J.V. Human L1 retrotransposition: cis preference versus trans complementation. Mol Cell Biol. 21:2001;1429-1439. This paper provides convincing experimental evidence for cis preference during L1 replication, fully supporting the prediction made in [35] . The authors provide support for one of the critical conditions that must be met to explain the persistence of only a single lineage of L1 elements in most mammals.
35. Kaplan N., Darden T., Langley C.H. Evolution and extinction of transposable elements in Mendelian populations. Genetics. 109:1985;459-480.
36. Burke W.D., Malik H.S., Lathe W.C. III, Eickbush T.H. Are retrotransposons long-term hitchhikers? Nature. 392:1998;141-142.
37. Burke W.D., Malik H.S., Rich S.M., Eickbush T.H. Ancient lineages of Non-LTR retrotransposons in the primitive eukaryote, Giardia lamblia. Mol Biol Evol. 19:2002;619-630.
38. Schueler M.G., Higgins A.W., Rudd M.K., Gustashaw K., Willard H.F. Genomic and genetic definition of a functional human centromere. Science. 294:2001;109-115. This report demonstrates that whereas pericentromeric regions on the X chromosome contain ancient L1 families (like the rest of the X chromosome), only progressively younger L1 families are found as the center of the centromere is approached. These results confirm the rapid evolution of centromeric structure, which, in light of its highly conserved function, remains a provocative enigma of mammalian evolution.
39. Sheen F.M., Sherry S.T., Risch G.M., Robichaux M., Nasidze I., Stoneking M., Batzer M.A., Swergold G.D. Reading between the LINEs: human genomic variation induced by LINE-1 retrotransposition. Genome Res. 10:2000;1496-1508.
40. Myers J.S., Vincent B.J., Udall H., Watkins W.S., Morrish T.A., Kilroy G.E., Swergold G.D., Henke J., Henke L., Moran J.V., et al. A comprehensive analysis of recently integrated human Ta L1 elements. Am J Hum Genet. 71:2002;312-326.
41. Batzer M.A., Stoneking M., Alegria-Hartman M., Bazan H., Kass D.H., Shaikh T.H., Novick G.E., Ioannou P.A., Scheer W.D., Herrera R.J., et al. African origin of human-specific polymorphic Alu insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:1994;12288-12292.
42. Hammer M.F. A recent insertion of an alu element on the Y chromosome is a useful marker for human population studies. Mol Biol Evol. 11:1994;749-761.
43. Batzer M.A., Deininger P.L. Alu repeats and human genomic diversity. Nat Rev Genet. 3:2002;370-379.
44. Romualdi C., Balding D., Nasidze I.S., Risch G., Robichaux M., Sherry S.T., Stoneking M., Batzer M.A., Barbujani G. Patterns of human diversity, within and among continents, inferred from biallelic DNA polymorphisms. Genome Res. 12:2002;602-612. The authors analysed 32 populations with polymorphic Alu insertions to reexamine the issue of whether humans can be divided into different biological groups and found no evidence for such distinctions.
45. Roy-Engel A.M., Carroll M.L., Vogel E., Garber R.K., Nguyen S.V., Salem A.H., Batzer M.A., Deininger P.L. Alu insertion polymorphisms for the study of human genomic diversity. Genetics. 159:2001;279-290.
46. Novick G.E., Novick C.C., Yunis J., Yunis E., Antunez de Mayolo P., Scheer W.D., Deininger P.L., Stoneking M., York D.S., Batzer M.A., et al. Polymorphic Alu insertions and the Asian origin of Native American populations. Hum Biol. 70:1998;23-39.
47. Deininger P.L., Batzer M.A. Alu repeats and human disease. Mol Genet Metab. 67:1999;183-193.
48. Hill A.S., Foot N.J., Chaplin T.L., Young B.D. The most frequent constitutional translocation in humans, the t(11;22)(q23;q11) is due to a highly specific alu-mediated recombination. Hum Mol Genet. 9:2000;1525-1532.
49. Cooper D.M., Schimenti K.J., Schimenti J.C. Factors affecting ectopic gene conversion in mice. Mamm Genome. 9:1998;355-360.
50. Burwinkel B., Kilimann M.W. Unequal homologous recombination between LINE-1 elements as a mutational mechanism in human genetic disease. J Mol Biol. 277:1998;513-517.
51. Inoue H., Ishii H., Alder H., Snyder E., Druck T., Huebner K., Croce C.M. Sequence of the FRA3B common fragile region: implications for the mechanism of FHIT deletion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:1997;14584-14589.
52. McNaughton J.C., Cockburn D.J., Hughes G., Jones W.A., Laing N.G., Ray P.N., Stockwell P.A., Petersen G.B. Is gene deletion in eukaryotes sequence-dependent? A study of nine deletion junctions and nineteen other deletion breakpoints in intron 7 of the human dystrophin gene. Gene. 222:1998;41-51.
53. Richard M., Belmaaza A., Gusew N., Wallenburg J.C., Chartrand P. Integration of a vector containing a repetitive LINE-1 element in the human genome. Mol Cell Biol. 14:1994;6689-6695.
54. Arkhipova I., Meselson M. Transposable elements in sexual and ancient asexual taxa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:2000;14473-14477. This striking paper demonstrates that of 26 animal phyla tested only the asexual Bdeloid rotifers lack retrotransposons. These provocative results could either mean that sexual reproduction is necessary for the spread of these elements in a population, or that co-existence with retrotransposons is incompatible without the selective mechanism provided by the sorting of alleles among gametes during meiotic recombination.
55. Kimura M. Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 78:1981;454-458.
56. Stauffer R.L., Walker A., Ryder O.A., Lyons-Weiler M., Hedges S.B. Human and ape molecular clocks and constraints on paleontological hypotheses. J Hered. 92:2001;469-474.