SUMO modification of a novel MAR-binding protein, SATB2, modulates immunoglobulin μ gene expression

Genes and Development

Volumn 17, Issue 24, 2003, Pages 3048-3061

  Dobreva, Gergana ^a   Dambacher, Julia ^a   Grosschedl, Rudolf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

MAR; Nuclear matrix; PIAS1; SATB2; SUMO

Indexed keywords

BINDING PROTEIN; ENZYME; IMMUNOGLOBULIN MU CHAIN; NUCLEAR MATRIX ATTACHMENT REGION; NUCLEAR MATRIX PROTEIN; SPECIAL AT RICH SEQUENCE BINDING PROTEIN 1; SUMO E3 LIGASE; SUMO PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; AT RICH SEQUENCE; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL TYPE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; IMMUNOGLOBULIN GENE; PRE B LYMPHOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN TARGETING;

B-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY SHIFT ASSAY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; HUMANS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN MU-CHAINS; LUMINESCENT PROTEINS; MATRIX ATTACHMENT REGION BINDING PROTEINS; MATRIX ATTACHMENT REGIONS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; NUCLEAR MATRIX; PLASMIDS; PROTEIN INHIBITORS OF ACTIVATED STAT; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTEINS; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; TUMOR CELLS, CULTURED;

EID: 0347361512     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1153003     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alvarez, J.D., Yasui, D.H., Niida, H., Joh, T., Loh, D.Y., and Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. 2000. The MAR-binding protein SATB1 orchestrates temporal and spatial expression of multiple genes during T-cell development. Genes & Dev. 14: 521-535.
2. Berezney, R. and Coffey, D.S. 1974. Identification of a nuclear protein matrix. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 60: 1410-1417.
3. Best, J.L., Ganiatsas, S., Agarwal, S., Changou, A., Salomoni, P., Shirihai, O., Meluh, P.B., Pandolfi, P.P., and Zon, L.I. 2002. SUMO-1 protease-1 regulates gene transcription through PML. Mol. Cell 10: 843-855.
4. Bode, J., Benham, C., Knopp, A., and Mielke, C. 2000. Transcriptional augmentation: Modulation of gene expression by scaffold/matrix-attached regions (S/MAR elements). Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 10: 73-90.
5. Cai, S., Han, H.J., and Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. 2003. Tissue-specific nuclear architecture and gene expression regulated by SATB1. Nat. Genet. 34: 42-51.
6. Chung, C.D., Liao, J., Liu, B., Rao, X., Jay, P., Berta, P., and Shuai, K. 1997. Specific inhibition of Stat3 signal transduction by PIAS3. Science 278: 1803-1805.
7. Cobb, B.S., Morales-Alcelay, S., Kleiger, G., Brown, K.E., Fisher, A.G., and Smale, S.T. 2000. Targeting of Ikaros to pericentromeric heterochromatin by direct DNA binding. Genes & Dev. 14: 2146-2160.
8. Cockerill, P.N. and Garrard, W.T. 1986. Chromosomal loop anchorage of the κ immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell 44: 273-282.
9. Cremer, T. and Cremer, C. 2001. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2: 292-301.
10. de Belle, I., Cai, S., and Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. 1998. The genomic sequences bound to special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 1 (SATB1) in vivo in Jurkat T cells are tightly associated with the nuclear matrix at the bases of the chromatin loops. J. Cell. Biol. 141: 335-348.
11. Desterro, J.M., Rodriguez, M.S., and Hay, R.T. 1998. SUMO-1 modification of IκBα inhibits NF-κB activation. Mol. Cell 2: 233-239.
12. Dickinson, L.A., Joh, T., Kohwi, Y., and Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. 1992. A tissue-specific MAR/SAR DNA-binding protein with unusual binding site recognition. Cell 70: 631-645.
13. Dickinson, L.A., Dickinson, C.D., and Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. 1997. An atypical homeodomain in SATB1 promotes specific recognition of the key structural element in a matrix attachment region. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 11463-11470.
14. Fernandez, L.A., Winkler, M., and Grosschedl, R. 2001. Matrix attachment region-dependent function of the immunoglobulin μ enhancer involves histone acetylation at a distance without changes in enhancer occupancy. Mol. Cell Biol. 21: 196-208.
15. Forrester, W.C., van Genderen, C., Jenuwein, T., and Grosschedl, R. 1994. Dependence of enhancer-mediated transcription of the immunoglobulin p gene on nuclear matrix attachment regions. Science 265: 1221-1225.
16. Forrester, W.C., Fernandez, L.A., and Grosschedl, R. 1999. Nuclear matrix attachment regions antagonize methylation-dependent repression of long-range enhancer-promoter interactions. Genes & Dev. 13: 3003-3014.
17. Freiman, R.N. and Tjian, R. 2003. Regulating the regulators: Lysine modifications make their mark. Cell 112: 11-17.
18. Galande, S., Dickinson, L.A., Mian, I.S., Sikorska, M., and Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. 2001. SATB1 cleavage by caspase 6 disrupts PDZ domain-mediated dimerization, causing detachment from chromatin early in T-cell apoptosis. Mol. Cell Biol. 21: 5591-5604.
19. Gill, G. 2003. Post-translational modification by the small ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO has big effects on transcription factor activity. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13: 108-113.
20. Goodson, M.L., Hong, Y., Rogers, R., Matunis, M.J., Park-Sarge, O.K., and Sarge, K.D. 2001. Sumo-1 modification regulates the DNA binding activity of heat shock transcription factor 2, a promyelocytic leukemia nuclear body associated transcription factor. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 18513-18518.
21. Gostissa, M., Hengstermann, A., Fogal, V., Sandy, P., Schwarz, S.E., Scheffner, M., and Del Sal, G. 1999. Activation of p53 by conjugation to the ubiquitin-like protein SUMO-1. EMBO J. 18: 6462-6471.
22. Herrscher, R.F., Kaplan, M.H., Lelsz, D.L., Das, C., Scheuermann, R., and Tucker, P.W. 1995. The immunoglobulin heavy-chain matrix-associating regions are bound by Bright: A B cell-specific trans-activator that describes a new DNA-binding protein family. Genes & Dev. 9: 3067-3082.
23. Hochstrasser, M. 2001. SP-RING for SUMO: New functions bloom for a ubiquitin-like protein. Cell 107: 5-8.
24. Hoege, C., Pfander, B., Moldovan, G.L., Pyrowolakis, G., and Jentsch, S. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419: 135-141.
25. Hong, Y., Rogers, R., Matunis, M.J., Mayhew, C.N., Goodson, M.L., Park-Sarge, O.K., Sarge, K.D., and Goodson, M. 2001. Regulation of heat shock transcription factor 1 by stress-induced SUMO-1 modification. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 40263-40267.
26. Jackson, P.K. 2001. A new RING for SUMO: Wrestling transcriptional responses into nuclear bodies with PIAS family E3 SUMO ligases. Genes & Dev. 15: 3053-3058.
27. Jenuwein, T., Forrester, W.C., Qiu, R.Q., and Grosschedl, R. 1993. The immunoglobulin p enhancer core establishes local factor access in nuclear chromatin independent of transcriptional stimulation. Genes & Dev. 7: 2016-2032.
28. Jenuwein, T., Forrester, W.C., Fernandez-Herrero, L.A., Laible, G., Dull, M., and Grosschedl, R. 1997. Extension of chromatin accessibility by nuclear matrix attachment regions. Nature 385: 269-272.
29. Johnson, E.S. and Gupta, A.A. 2001. An E3-like factor that promotes SUMO conjugation to the yeast septins. Cell 106: 735-744.
30. Kagey, M.H., Melhuish, T.A., and Wotton, D. 2003. The polycomb protein Pc2 is a SUMO E3. Cell 113: 127-137.
31. Kahyo, T., Nishida, T., and Yasuda, H. 2001. Involvement of PIAS1 in the sumoylation of tumor suppressor p53. Mol. Cell 8: 713-718.
32. Kaplan, M.H., Zong, R.T., Herrscher, R.F., Scheuermann, R.H., and Tucker, P.W. 2001. Transcriptional activation by a matrix associating region-binding protein. Contextual requirements for the function of bright. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 21325-21330.
33. Kirsh, O., Seeler, J.S., Pichler, A., Gast, A., Muller, S., Miska, E., Mathieu, M., Harel-Bellan, A., Kouzarides, T., Melchior, F., et al. 2002. The SUMO E3 ligase RanBP2 promotes modification of the HDAC4 deacetylase. EMBO J. 21: 2682-2691.
34. Kohwi-Shigematsu, T., Maass, K., and Bode, J. 1997. A thymocyte factor SATB1 suppresses transcription of stably integrated matrix-attachment region-linked reporter genes. Biochemistry 36: 12005-12010.
35. Kosak, S.T., Skok, J.A., Medina, K.L., Riblet, R., Le Beau, M.M., Fisher, A.G., and Singh, H. 2002. Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science 296: 158-162.
36. Li, S.J. and Hochstrasser, M. 1999. A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature 398: 246-251.
37. Lichtenstein, M., Keini, G., Cedar, H., and Bergman, Y. 1994. B cell-specific demethylation: A novel role for the intronic κ chain enhancer sequence. Cell 76: 913-923.
38. Lin, X., Sun, B., Liang, M., Liang, Y.Y., Gast, A., Hildebrand, J., Brunicardi, F.C., Melchior, F., and Feng, X.H. 2003. Opposed regulation of corepressor CtBP by SUMOylation and PDZ binding. Mol. Cell 11: 1389-1396.
39. Litt, M.D., Simpson, M., Gaszner, M., Allis, C.D., and Felsenfeld, G. 2001. Correlation between histone lysine methylation and developmental changes at the chicken β-globin locus. Science 293: 2453-2455.
40. Liu, B., Liao, J., Rao, X., Kushner, S.A., Chung, C.D., Chang, D.D., and Shuai, K. 1998. Inhibition of Stat1-mediated gene activation by PIAS1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 10626-10631.
41. Melchior, F. 2000. SUMO - Nonclassical ubiquitin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16: 591-626.
42. Mirkovitch, J., Mirault, M.E., and Laemmli, U.K. 1984. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: Specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell 39: 223-232.
43. Muller, S., Matunis, M.J., and Dejean, A. 1998. Conjugation with the ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1 regulates the partitioning of PML within the nucleus. EMBO J. 17: 61-70.
44. Muller, S., Hoege, C., Pyrowolakis, G., and Jentsch, S. 2001. SUMO, ubiquitin's mysterious cousin. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2: 202-210.
45. Pichler, A., Gast, A., Seeler, J.S., Dejean, A., and Melchior, F. 2002. The nucleoporin RanBP2 has SUMO1 E3 ligase activity. Cell 108: 109-120.
46. Rigaut, G., Shevchenko, A., Rutz, B., Wilm, M., Mann, M., and Seraphin, B. 1999. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol. 17: 1030-1032.
47. Rodriguez, M.S., Desterro, J.M., Lain, S., Midgley, C.A., Lane, D.P., and Hay, R.T. 1999. SUMO-1 modification activates the transcriptional response of p53. EMBO J. 18: 6455-6461.
48. Rodriguez, M.S., Dargemont, C., and Hay, R.T. 2001. SUMO-1 conjugation in vivo requires both a consensus modification motif and nuclear targeting. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 12654-12659.
49. Romig, H., Fackelmayer, F.O., Renz, A., Ramsperger, U., and Richter, A. 1992. Characterization of SAF-A, a novel nuclear DNA binding protein from HeLa cells with high affinity for nuclear matrix/scaffold attachment DNA elements. EMBO J. 11: 3431-3440.
50. Ross, S., Best, J.L., Zon, L.I., and Gill, G. 2002. SUMO-1 modification represses Sp3 transcriptional activation and modulates its subnuclear localization. Mol. Cell 10: 831-842.
51. Sachdev, S., Bruhn, L., Sieber, H., Pichler, A., Melchior, F., and Grosschedl, R. 2001. PIASy, a nuclear matrix-associated SUMO E3 ligase, represses LEF1 activity by sequestration into nuclear bodies. Genes & Dev. 15: 3088-3103.
52. Saitoh, H. and Hinchey, J. 2000. Functional heterogeneity of small ubiquitin-related protein modifiers SUMO-1 versus SUMO-2/3. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 6252-6258.
53. Sapetschnig, A., Rischitor, G., Braun, H., Doll, A., Schergaut, M., Melchior, F., and Suske, G. 2002. Transcription factor Sp3 is silenced through SUMO modification by PIAS1. EMBO J. 21: 5206-5215.
54. Scheuermann, R.H. and Chen, U. 1989. A developmental-specific factor binds to suppressor sites flanking the immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer. Genes & Dev. 3: 1255-1266.
55. Scheuermann, R.H. and Garrard, W.T. 1999. MARs of antigen receptor and co-receptor genes. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 9: 295-310.
56. Schmidt, D. and Muller, S. 2002. Members of the PIAS family act as SUMO ligases for c-Jun and p53 and repress p53 activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 2872-2877.
57. Schubeler, D., Mielke, C., Maass, K., and Bode, J. 1996. Scaffold/matrix-attached regions act upon transcription in a context-dependent manner. Biochemistry 35: 11160-11169.
58. Schul, W., de Jong, L., and van Driel, R. 1998. Nuclear neighbours: The spatial and functional organization of genes and nuclear domains. J. Cell Biochem. 70: 159-171.
59. Spector, D.L. 2001. Nuclear domains. J. Cell Sci. 114: 2891-2893.
60. Starr, D.B., Matsui, W., Thomas, J.R., and Yamamoto, K.R. 1996. Intracellular receptors use a common mechanism to interpret signaling information at response elements. Genes & Dev. 10: 1271-1283.
61. Tian, S., Poukka, H., Palvimo, J.J., and Janne, O.A. 2002. Small ubiquitin-related modifier-1 (SUMO-1) modification of the glucocorticoid receptor. Biochem. J. 367: 907-911.
62. Verger, A., Perdomo, J., and Crossley, M. 2003. Modification with SUMO. EMBO Rep. 4: 137-142.
63. Wang, Z., Goldstein, A., Zong, R.T., Lin, D., Neufeld, E.J., Scheuermann, R.H., and Tucker, P.W. 1999. Cux/CDP homeoprotein is a component of NF-muNR and represses the immunoglobulin heavy chain intronic enhancer by antagonizing the bright transcription activator. Mol. Cell Biol. 19: 284-295.
64. Webb, C., Zong, R.T., Lin, D., Wang, Z., Kaplan, M., Paulin, Y., Smith, E., Probst, L., Bryant, J., Goldstein, A., et al. 1999. Differential regulation of immunoglobulin gene transcription via nuclear matrix-associated regions. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 64: 109-118.
65. Weitzel, J.M., Buhrmester, H., and Stratling, W.H. 1997. Chicken MAR-binding protein ARBP is homologous to rat methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2. Mol. Cell Biol. 17: 5656-5666.
66. Xu, M., Hammer, R.E., Blasquez, V.C., Jones, S.L., and Garrard, W.T. 1989. Immunoglobulin κ gene expression after stable integration. II. Role of the intronic MAR and enhancer in transgenic mice. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 21190-21195.
67. Yang, S.H., Jaffray, E., Hay, R.T., and Sharrocks, A.D. 2003. Dynamic interplay of the SUMO and ERK pathways in regulating Elk-1 transcriptional activity. Mol. Cell 12: 63-74.
68. Yasui, D., Miyano, M., Cai, S., Varga-Weisz, P., and Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. 2002. SATB1 targets chromatin remodelling to regulate genes over long distances. Nature 419: 641-645.
69. Zeng, C., Kim, E., Warren, S.L., and Berget, S.M. 1997. Dynamic relocation of transcription and splicing factors dependent upon transcriptional activity. EMBO J. 16: 1401-1412.
70. Zhang, Y. and Reinberg, D. 2001. Transcription regulation by histone methylation: Interplay between different covalent modifications of the core histone tails. Genes & Dev. 15: 2343-2360.
71. Zong, R.T., Das, C., and Tucker, P.W. 2000. Regulation of matrix attachment region-dependent, lymphocyte-restricted transcription through differential localization within promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. EMBO J. 19: 4123-4133.