Interpreting Students' and Teachers' Discourse in Science Classes: An Underestimated Problem?

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 115-134

  Klaassen, C W J M ^a   Lijnse, P L ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002508307     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199602)33:2<115::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-X     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson, O.R. (1992). Some interrelationships between constructivist models of learning and current neurobiological theory, with implications for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 1037-1058.
2. Bell, B. (Ed.). (1994). Teacher development [Special Issue]. International Journal of Science Education, 16(5).
3. Bliss, J., & Ogborn, J. (1993). A common-sense theory of motion. In P.J. Black & A.M. Lucas (Eds.), Children's informal ideas in science (pp. 120-133). London: Routledge.
4. Champagne, A.B., Klopfer, L.E., & Anderson, J.H. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1074-1079.
5. Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1241-1257.
6. Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Davidson, D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8. Davidson, D. (1990). The structure and content of truth. The Journal of Philosophy, 87, 279-328.
9. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12.
10. Duit, R., Goldberg, F., & Niedderer, H. (Eds.). (1992). Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Kiel: IPN.
11. Dykstra, D.I., Boyle, C.F., & Monarch, I.A. (1992). Studying conceptual change in learning physics. Science Education, 76, 615-652.
12. Engel Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1986). A study of consistency in the use of students' conceptual frameworks across different task contexts. Science Education, 70, 473-496.
13. Finegold, M., & Gorsky, P. (1991). Students' concepts of force as applied to related physical systems: A search for consistency. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 97-113.
14. Grandy, R., & Hamilton, R. (1992). Prototypes and conceptual change. In S. Hills (Ed.), The history and philosophy of science and science education (Vol. I.) (pp. 435-448). Kingston: Queen's University.
15. Gunstone, R., & Watts, M. (1985). Force and motion. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 85-104). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
16. Halloun, I.A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1043-1055.
17. Hewson, P.W. (1985). Epistemological commitments on the learning of science: Examples from dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 163-172.
18. Klaassen, C.W.J.M. (1995). A problem-posing approach to teaching the topic of radioactivity. Utrecht: CD-B Press.
19. Kuhn, T.S. (1970a). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
20. Kuhn, T.S. (1970b). Reflections on my critics. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 231-278). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
21. Labudde, P., Reif, F., & Quinn, L. (1988). Facilitation of scientific concept learning by interpretation procedures and diagnosis. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 81-98.
22. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science. Norwood: Ablex.
23. Lijnse, P.L., Kortland, K., Eijhelhof, H.M.C., van Genderen, D., & Hooymayers, H.P. (1990). A thematic physics curriculum: A balance between contradictory curriculum forces. Science Education, 74, 95-103.
24. McDermott, L.C. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today, 37, 24-32.
25. Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the "at rest" condition of an object. The Physics Teacher, 20, 10-14.
26. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography students' alternative frameworks and science education (4th ed.). Kiel: IPN.
27. Ramberg, B.T. (1989). Donald Davidson's philosophy of language: An introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
28. Reif, F., & Larkin, J.H. (1991). Cognition in scientific and everyday domains: Comparison and learning implications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 733-760.
29. Stoecker, R. (Ed.). (1993). Reflecting Davidson: Donald Davidson responding to an international forum of philosophers. Berlin: de Gruyter.
30. Ten Voorde, H.H. (1990). On teaching and learning about atoms and molecules from a van Hiele point of view. In P.L. Lijnse, Licht, P., de Vos, W., & Waarlo, A.J. (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles: A central problem in secondary science education (pp. 81-103). Utrecht: CD-B Press.
31. Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instruction strategies. American Journal of Physics, 59, 891-897.
32. Viennot, L. (1985). Analyzing students' reasoning: Tendencies in interpretation. American Journal of Physics, 53, 432-436.
33. Viennot, L. (1994). Fundamental patterns in common reasoning: Examples in physics. In P.L. Lijnse (Ed.), European research in science education (pp. 33-47). Utrecht: CD-B Press.