Using combinatorial methods to arrive at a quantitative structure-stability relationship for a new class of one-armed cationic peptide receptors targeting the C-terminus of the amyloid β-peptide

Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 633-636

  Schmuck, Carsten ^a   Heil, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; COMPLEXATION; ELECTROSTATICS; FLUORESCENCE; HYDROPHOBICITY; POSITIVE IONS; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION);

AMYLOID PEPTIDE; BINDING CONSTANTS; CATIONIC PEPTIDE; COMBINATORIAL LIBRARY; FLUORESCENCE ASSAY; STRUCTURE-STABILITY RELATIONSHIP;

AMINO ACIDS;

AMYLOID BETA PROTEIN; PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PYRROLE DERIVATIVE; RECEPTOR;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; MOLECULAR MIMICRY; PROTEIN BINDING; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SYNTHESIS;

AMYLOID BETA-PROTEIN; BINDING SITES; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MOLECULAR MIMICRY; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PROTEIN BINDING; PYRROLES; RECEPTORS, PEPTIDE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0042508739     PISSN: 14770520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b211425a     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. (a) P. Kurosinski, M. Guggisberg and J. Götz, Trends Mol. Med., 2002, 8, 3-5
2. (b) L. Dumery, F. Bourdel, Y. Sousssan, A. Fialkowsky, S. Viale, P. Nicolas and M. Reboud-Ravaux, Pathol. Biol., 2001, 49, 72-85
3. (c) R. Knight, Proteomics, 2001, 1, 763-766
4. (d) F. Edenhofer, S. Weiss, E.-L. Winnacker and M. Famulok, Angew. Chem., 1997, 109, 1748-1769.
5. (a) E. Zerovnik, Eur. J. Biochem., 2002, 69, 3362-3371
6. (b) J. Hardy and D. J. Selkoe, Science, 2002, 297, 353-356
7. (c) B. Austen and M. Manca, Chem. Brit., 2000, 28-31
8. (d) L. Gopinath, Chem. Brit., 1998, 38-40
9. (e) P. T. Lansbury, Jr., Acc. Chem. Res., 1996, 29, 317-321
10. (f) B. A. Yankner, Neuron, 1996, 16, 921-932.
11. P. T. Lansbury, Jr., Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 1997, 1, 260-267.
12. (a) K. Watanabe, K. Nakamura, S. Akikusa, T. Okada, M. Kodaka, T. Konakahara and H. Okuno, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2002, 290, 121-124
13. (b) C. Hetenyi, Z. Szabo, E. Klement, Z. Datki, T. Körtvelyesi, M. Zarandi and B. Penke, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2002, 292, 931-936
14. (c) T. L. Lowe, A. Strzelec, L. L. Kiessling and R. M. Murphy, Biochemistry, 2001, 40, 7882-7889
15. (d) C. Soto, J. Mol. Med., 1999, 5, 343-350.
16. (a) Y. Takahashi, A. Ueno and H. Mihara, ChemBioChem, 2002, 3, 637-642
17. (b) K. Watanabe, T. Segawa, K. Nakamura, M. Kodaka, T. Konakahara and H. Okuno, J. Pept. Res., 2001, 58, 342-346
18. (c) L. O. Tjernberg, D. J. E. Callaway, A. Tjernberg, S. Hahne, C. Lilliehöök, L. Terenius, J. Thyberg and C. Nordstedt, J. Biol. Chem., 1999, 18, 12619-12625.
19. For related work on other peptide substrates see e.g.: (a) K. Jensen, T. M. Braxmeier, M. Demarcus, J. G. Frey and J. D. Kilburn, Chem. Eur. J., 2002, 8, 1300-1309
20. (b) R. Xuo, G. Greiveldinger, L. E. Marenus, A. Cooper and J. A. Ellman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 4898-4899
21. For a review see: (c) M. W. Peczuh and A. D. Hamilton, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 2479-2493.
22. J. T. Jarret, E. P. Berger and P. T. Lansbury, Jr., Biochemistry, 1993, 32, 4693-4697.
23. M. O. Chaney, S. D. Webster, Y.-M. Kuo and A. E. Roher, Protein Engineering, 1998, 11, 761-767.
24. (a) C. Schmuck, Chem. Commun., 1999, 843-844
25. (b) C. Schmuck, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1999, 2397-2403
26. (c) C. Schmuck, Chem. Eur. J., 2000, 6, 709-718.
27. (a) L. A. Thompson and J. A. Ellman, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 555-600
28. (b) F. Balkenhohl, C. von dem Busche-Hünnefeld, A. Lansky and C. Zechel, Angew. Chem., 1996, 108, 2436-2487
29. (c) G. Lowe, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1995, 309-317.
30. TentaGel was used as the solid support to allow a screening of the receptor library not only in methanol but later on for also other studies in aqueous polar solvents.
31. K. S. Lam, M. Lebl and V. Krchnak, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 411-448.
32. A. W. Czarnik, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 1997, 1, 60-66.
33. Due to the low solubility of zwitter ion 2 in DMF a modified coupling protocol was necessary, using an excess of 2 equivalents of 2, PyBOP as the coupling reagent in 5% NMM in DMF at room temperature and reaction times of 20 h. To ensure quantitative yields the coupling was performed twice.
34. W. C. Still, Acc. Chem. Res., 1996, 29, 155-163.
35. 2 50:50), the desired fluorescence labeled substrate 3 in analytically pure form. The corresponding methyl ester 4, which was needed as a control, was obtained via esterification of the free acid using methanol and thionyl chloride.
36. The well binding receptors were selected using a 13 μmolar solution of the labeled substrate, whereas the weak binding receptors were selected from an assay using a 260 μmolar solution.
37. S. S. Yoon and W. C. Still, Tetrahedron, 1995, 51, 567-578.
38. P. T. Lansbury, Jr., P. R. Costa, J. M. Griffiths, E. J. Simon, M. Auger, K. J. Halverson, D. A. Kocisko, Z. S. Hendsch, T. T. Ashbury, R. G. S. Spencer, B. Tidor and R. G. Griffin, Nat. Struct. Biol., 1995, 2, 990-998.
39. F. Mohamadi, N. G. J. Richards, W. C. Guida, R. Liskamp, M. Lipton, C. Caufiled, G. Chang, T. Hendrickson and W. C. Still, J. Comput. Chem., 1990, 11, 440-467.