The structure of barley α-amylase isozyme 1 reveals a novel role of domain C in substrate recognition and binding: A pair of sugar tongs

Structure

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 973-984

  Robert, Xavier ^a   Haser, Richard ^a   Gottschalk, Tine E ^b   Ratajczak, Fabien ^c   Driguez, Hugues ^c   Svensson, Birte ^b   Aghajari, Nushin ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE BIOLOGIE ET CHIMIE DES PROTÉINES   (France)

^b CARLSBERG LABORATORY   (Denmark)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; AMYLASE ISOENZYME 1; BACTERIAL ENZYME; CALCIUM ION; FUNGAL ENZYME; SUGAR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ASPERGILLUS NIGER; ASPERGILLUS ORYZAE; BACILLUS LICHENIFORMIS; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BARLEY; CALCIUM BINDING; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ASSAY; ENZYME CONFORMATION; ENZYME STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; GEOBACILLUS STEAROTHERMOPHILUS; HUMAN; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PSEUDOMONAS STUTZERI; SPECIES COMPARISON; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ASPERGILLUS; ASPERGILLUS NIGER; ASPERGILLUS ORYZAE; BACILLUS LICHENIFORMIS; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); GEOBACILLUS STEAROTHERMOPHILUS; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE; PSEUDOMONAS; PSEUDOMONAS STUTZERI;

EID: 0041663295     PISSN: 09692126     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00151-5     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abe J., Sidenius U., Svensson B. Arginine is essential for the α-amylase inhibitory activity of the α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor (BASI) from barley seeds. Biochem. J. 293:1993;151-155.
2. Aghajari N., Feller G., Gerday C., Haser R. Crystal structures of the psychrophilic α-amylase from Alteromonas haloplanctis in its native form and complexed with an inhibitor. Protein Sci. 7:1998;564-572. a.
3. Aghajari N., Feller G., Gerday C., Haser R. Structures of the psychrophilic Alteromonas haloplanctis α-amylase give insights into cold adaptation at a molecular level. Structure. 6:1998;1503-1516. b.
4. Ajandouz E.H., Abe J., Svensson B., Marchis-Mouren G. Barley malt-α-amylase. Purification, action pattern, and subsite mapping of isozyme 1 and two members of the isozyme 2 subfamily using p-nitrophenylated maltooligosaccharide substrates. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1159:1992;193-202.
5. André G., Buleon A., Haser R., Tran V. Amylose chain behavior in an interacting context. III. Complete occupancy of the AMY2 barley α-amylase cleft and comparison with biochemical data. Biopolymers. 50:1999;751-762.
6. Banner D.W., Bloomer A.C., Petsko G.A., Phillips D.C., Pogson C.I., Wilson I.A., Corran P.H., Furth A.J., Milman J.D., Offord R.E.et al. Structure of chicken muscle triose phosphate isomerase determined crystallographically at 2.5 Å resolution using amino acid sequence data. Nature. 255:1975;609-614.
7. Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., Shindyalov I.N., Bourne P.E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:2000;235-242.
8. Bertoft E., Andtfolk C., Kulp S.E. Effect of pH, temperature, and calcium-ions on barley malt α-amylase isoenzymes. J. Inst. Brew. 90:1984;298-302.
9. Blanc-Muesser M., Vigne L., Driguez H., Lehmann J., Steck J., Urbahns K. Spacer-modified disaccharide and pseudo-trisaccharide methyl glycosides that mimic maltotriose, as competitive inhibitors for pancreatic α-amylase. a demonstration of the "clustering effect" Carbohydr. Res. 224:1992;59-71.
10. Boel E., Brady L., Brzozowski A.M., Derewenda Z., Dodson G.G., Jensen V.J., Petersen S.B., Swift H., Thim L., Woldike H.F. Calcium binding in α-amylases. an X-ray diffraction study at 2.1 Å resolution of two enzymes from Aspergillus Biochemistry. 29:1990;6244-6249.
11. Brayer G.D., Luo Y., Withers S.G. The structure of human pancreatic α-amylase at 1.8 Å resolution and comparisons with related enzymes. Protein Sci. 4:1995;1730-1742.
12. Brünger A.T. Free R value. a novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures Nature. 355:1992;472-475.
13. Brünger A.T., Adams P.D., Clore G.M., DeLano W.L., Gros P., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Jiang J.S., Kuszewski J., Nilges M., Pannu N.S.et al. Crystallography and NMR system. a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54:1998;905-921.
14. Brzozowski A.M., Lawson D.M., Turkenburg J.P., Bisgaard-Frantzen H., Svendsen A., Borchert T.V., Dauter Z., Wilson K.S., Davies G.J. Structural analysis of a chimeric bacterial α-amylase. High-resolution analysis of native and ligand complexes. Biochemistry. 39:2000;9099-9107.
15. Bush D.S., Sticher L., van Huystee R., Wagner D., Jones R.L. The calcium requirement for stability and enzymatic activity of two isoforms of barley aleurone α-amylase. J. Biol. Chem. 264:1989;19392-19398.
16. CCP4 The CCP4 (CCP4 Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4.) suite. programs for protein crystallography Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50:1994;760-763.
17. Fujimoto Z., Takase K., Doui N., Momma M., Matsumoto T., Mizuno H. Crystal structure of a catalytic-site mutant α-amylase from Bacillus subtilis complexed with maltopentaose. J. Mol. Biol. 277:1998;393-407.
18. Gibson R.M., Svensson B. Identification of tryptophanyl residues involved in binding of carbohydrate ligands to barley α-amylase 2. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 52:1987;373-379.
19. Gouet P., Courcelle E., Stuart D.I., Metoz F. ESPript. analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript Bioinformatics. 15:1999;305-308.
20. Hooft R.W., Vriend G., Sander C., Abola E.E. Errors in protein structures. Nature. 381:1996;272.
21. Jones R.L., Jacobsen J.V. Regulation of synthesis and transport of secreted proteins in cereal aleurone. Int. Rev. Cytol. 126:1991;49-88.
22. 8-barrel. Implication for BASI sensitivity and substrate affinity. FEBS Lett. 363:1995;299-303.
23. Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure. pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features Biopolymers. 22:1983;2577-2637.
24. Kadziola A., Abe J., Svensson B., Haser R. Crystal and molecular structure of barley α-amylase. J. Mol. Biol. 239:1994;104-121.
25. Kadziola A., Søgaard M., Svensson B., Haser R. Molecular structure of a barley α-amylase-inhibitor complex. implications for starch binding and catalysis J. Mol. Biol. 278:1998;205-217.
26. Kraulis P.J. Molscript. a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24:1991;946-950.
27. Larson S.B., Greenwood A., Cascio D., Day J., McPherson A. Refined molecular structure of pig pancreatic α-amylase at 2.1 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1994;1560-1584.
28. Leah R., Mundy J. The bifunctional α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor of barley. nucleotide sequence and patterns of seed specific expression Plant Mol. Biol. 12:1989;673-682.
29. MacGregor A.W., Ballance D.L. Hydrolysis of large and small starch granules from normal and waxy barley cultivars by α-amylases from barley malt. Cereal Chem. 57:1980;397-402.
30. MacGregor A.W., Morgan J.E. Hydrolysis of barley starch granules by α-amylases from barley malt. Cereal Foods World. 31:1986;688-693.
31. MacGregor E.A., MacGregor A.W., Macri L.J., Morgan J.E. Models for the action of barley α-amylase isozymes on linear substrates. Carbohydr. Res. 257:1994;249-268.
32. MacGregor E.A., Janecek S., Svensson B. Relationship of sequence and structure to specificity in the α-amylase family of enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1546:2001;1-20.
33. Machius M., Vertesy L., Huber R., Wiegand G. Carbohydrate and protein-based inhibitors of porcine pancreatic α-amylase. structure analysis and comparison of their binding characteristics J. Mol. Biol. 260:1996;409-421.
34. Machius M., Declerck N., Huber R., Wiegand G. Activation of Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase through a disorder → order transition of the substrate-binding site mediated by a calcium-sodium-calcium metal triad. Structure. 6:1998;281-292.
35. 8-barrel domain of barley α-amylase 1. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;22456-22463.
36. Merritt E.A., Bacon D.J. Raster3D. photorealistic molecular graphics Methods Enzymol. 277:1997;505-524.
37. Mezaki Y., Katsuya Y., Kubota M., Matsuura Y. Crystallization and structural analysis of intact maltotetraose-forming exo-amylase from Pseudomonas stutzeri. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 65:2001;222-225.
38. Mori H., Bak-Jensen K.S., Gottschalk T.E., Motawia M.S., Damager I., Moller B.L., Svensson B. Modulation of activity and substrate binding modes by mutation of single and double subsites +1/+2 and -5/-6 of barley α-amylase 1. Eur. J. Biochem. 268:2001;6545-6558.
39. 8-barrel and is critical for activity and substrate specificity. Eur. J. Biochem. 269:2002;5377-5390.
40. Mundy J., Svendsen I., Hejgaard J. Barley α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor. Isolation and characterization. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 48:1983;81-90.
41. Nicholls A., Sharp K.A., Honig B. Protein folding and association. insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons Proteins. 11:1991;281-296.
42. Otwinoswki Z., Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 26:1997;307-326.
43. Qian M., Haser R., Payan F. Carbohydrate binding sites in a pancreatic α-amylase-substrate complex, derived from X-ray structure analysis at 2.1 Å resolution. Protein Sci. 4:1995;747-755.
44. Quiocho F.A. Protein-carbohydrate interactions. basic molecule features Pure Appl. Chem. 61:1989;1293-1306.
45. Ramasubbu N., Paloth V., Luo Y.G., Brayer G.D., Levine M.J. Structure of human salivary α-amylase at 1.6 Å resolution. implications for its role in the oral cavity Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 52:1996;435.
46. Ratajczak F., Greffe L., Cottaz S., Driguez H. Convergent synthesis of 4-thiomaltooligosaccharides. Synlett. 9:2003;1253-1254.
47. Robert X., Gottschalk T.E., Haser R., Svensson B., Aghajari N. Expression, purification and preliminary crystallographic studies of α-amylase isozyme 1 from barley seeds. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58:2002;683-686. a.
48. Robert X., Haser R., Svensson B., Aghajari N. Comparison of crystal structures of barley α-amylase 1 and 2. implications for isozyme differences in stability and activity Biologia (Bratisl.) Suppl. 11:2002;59-70. b.
49. Rodenburg K.W., Juge N., Guo X.J., Søgaard M., Chaix J.C., Svensson B. Domain B protruding at the third β strand of the α/β barrel in barley α-amylase confers distinct isozyme-specific properties. Eur. J. Biochem. 221:1994;277-284.
50. Rodenburg K.W., Vallée F., Juge N., Aghajari N., Guo X., Haser R., Svensson B. Specific inhibition of barley α-amylase 2 by barley α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor depends on charge interactions and can be conferred to isozyme 1 by mutation. Eur. J. Biochem. 267:2000;1019-1029.
51. Rogers J.C. Conserved amino acid sequence domains in α-amylases from plants, mammals, and bacteria. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 128:1985;470-476. a.
52. Rogers J.C. Two barley α-amylase gene families are regulated differently in aleurone cells. J. Biol. Chem. 260:1985;3731-3738. b.
53. Rogers J.C., Milliman C. Isolation and sequence analysis of a barley α-amylase cDNA clone. J. Biol. Chem. 258:1983;8169-8174.
54. Roussel A., Cambillau C. TURBO-FRODO. 1989;Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, CA.
55. Sidenius U., Olsen K., Svensson B., Christensen U. Stopped-flow kinetic studies of the reaction of barley α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor and the high pI barley α-amylase. FEBS Lett. 361:1995;250-254.
56. Søgaard M., Svensson B. Expression of cDNAs encoding barley α-amylase 1 and 2 in yeast and characterization of the secreted proteins. Gene. 94:1990;173-179.
57. Søgaard M., Kadziola A., Haser R., Svensson B. Site-directed mutagenesis of histidine 93, aspartic acid 180, glutamic acid 205, histidine 290, and aspartic acid 291 at the active site and tryptophan 279 at the raw starch binding site in barley α-amylase 1. J. Biol. Chem. 268:1993;22480-22484.
58. Strobl S., Maskos K., Betz M., Wiegand G., Huber R., Gomis-Ruth F.X., Glockshuber R. Crystal structure of yellow meal worm α-amylase at 1.64 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 278:1998;617-628.
59. Suvd D., Fujimoto Z., Takase K., Matsumura M., Mizuno H. Crystal structure of Bacillus stearothermophilus α-amylase. possible factors determining the thermostability J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 129:2001;461-468.
60. Svendsen I., Hejgaard J., Mundy J. Complete amino acid sequence of the α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor from barley. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 51:1986;43-50.
61. Svensson B., Gibson R.M., Haser R., Astier J.P. Crystallization of barley malt α-amylases and preliminary X-ray diffraction studies of the high pI isozyme, α-amylase 2. J. Biol. Chem. 262:1987;13682-13684.
62. Swift H.J., Brady L., Derewenda Z.S., Dodson E.J., Dodson G.G., Turkenburg J.P., Wilkinson A.J. Structure and molecular model refinement of Aspergillus oryzae (TAKA) α-amylase. an application of the simulated-annealing method Acta Crystallogr. B. 47:1991;535-544.
63. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. Clustal w. improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1994;4673-4680.
64. Truscheit E., Frommer W., Junge B., Muller L., Schmidt D.D., Wingender W. Chemistry and biochemistry of microbial α-glucosidases inhibitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 20:1981;744-761.
65. Vallée F., Kadziola A., Bourne Y., Juy M., Rodenburg K.W., Svensson B., Haser R. Barley α-amylase bound to its endogenous protein inhibitor BASI. crystal structure of the complex at 1.9 Å resolution Structure. 6:1998;649-659.
66. Wallace A.C., Laskowski R.A., Thornton J.M. Ligplot. a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions Protein Eng. 8:1995;127-134.