Tuning carbon nanotube band gaps with strain

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 90, Issue 15, 2003, Pages

  Minot, E D ^a   Yaish, Yuval ^a   Sazonova, Vera ^a   Park, Ji Yong ^a   Brink, Markus ^a   McEuen, Paul L ^a  

^a Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics and Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; ENERGY GAP; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRAIN;

BAND GAP; STRAIN MODULATION;

CARBON NANOTUBES;

EID: 0038201867     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. T. W. Odom et al., Nature (London) 391, 62 (1998).
2. J. W. G. Wildoer et al., Nature (London) 391, 59 (1998).
3. M. F. Yu et al., Science 287, 637 (2000).
4. J. P. Salvetat et al., Appl. Phys. A 69, 255 (1999).
5. R. Heyd, A. Charlier, and E. McRae, Phys. Rev. B 55, 6820 (1997).
6. C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1932 (1997).
7. A. Rochefort, D. R. Salahub, and P. Avouris, Chem. Phys. Lett. 297, 45 (1998).
8. L. Yang et al., Phys. Rev. B 60, 13 874 (1999).
9. S. Paulson, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 2936 (1999).
10. T. W. Tombler et al., Nature (London) 405, 769 (2000).
11. L. Yang and J. Han, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 154 (2000).
12. A. Maiti, A. Svizhenko, and M. P. Anantram, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 126805 (2002).
13. J. Lee et al., Nature (London) 415, 1005 (2002).
14. D. A. Walters et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 3803 (1999).
15. J. P. Salvetat et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 944 (1999).
16. J. Nygard and D. H. Cobden, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 4216 (2001).
17. N. R. Franklin et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 913 (2002).
18. J. Kong et al., Nature (London) 395, 878 (1998).
19. S. Rosenblatt et al., Nano Lett. 2, 869 (2002).
20. Many of the etched devices are not robust, as evidenced by degradation of electrical contact during AFM imaging. The data presented here is from NTs that have robust contact with the gold electrodes.
21. J. Y. Part et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 4446 (2002).
22. J. L. Hutter and J. Bechhoefer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 1868 (1993).
23. For consistent NT-tip alignment, the x-y piezo must be stabilized for many minutes. As a NT is pushed, tip deflection can jump suddenly toward zero. Slack is not changed by these events; therefore we associate such jumps with slips of the NT-tip contact. Favorable contact is achieved by trial and error. A low noise laser, available by special request from Digital Instruments technical support, suppresses laser interference effects that can contaminate tip deflection data.
24. B. I. Yakobson, C. J. Brabec, and H. Bernhole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2511 (1996).
25. X. Zhou, J. J. Zhou, and Z. C. Ou-Yang, Phys. Rev. B 62, 13 692 (2000).
26. J. P. Lu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1297 (1997).
27. S. Decossas et al., Europhys. Lett. 53, 742 (2001).
28. 0, x-y tip positioning, and the cantilever spring constant.
29. The PtIr metal coating on the AFM tip makes very poor electrical contact with the NT with typical leakage resistance > 10 G Ω.
30. J. W. Park and P. L. McEuen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1363 (2001).
31. A. Bachtold et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 6082 (2000).
32. C. T. White and J. W. Mintmire, Nature (London) 394, 29 (1998).
33. gap = 200 meV), the effect of tunneling is negligible.
34. Similar calculations and estimates of ζ are found in F. Leonard and J. Tersoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5174 (1999)
35. A. A. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 150 (2000).